Fanny Dao1, Brooke A Schlappe1, Jill Tseng1, Jenny Lester2, Alpa M Nick3, Susan K Lutgendorf4, Scott McMeekin5, Robert L Coleman3, Kathleen N Moore5, Beth Y Karlan2, Anil K Sood3, Douglas A Levine6. 1. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York, United States. 2. Women's Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 3. Departments of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Biology, Center for RNA Interference and Noncoding RNA, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, United States. 4. Departments of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, United States. 5. Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Oklahoma City, OK, United States. 6. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York, United States. Electronic address: levine2@mskcc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) generally presents at an advanced stage with poor long-term (LT) survival. Here we describe clinical features found in women surviving HGSC for ten or more years. METHODS: A multi-center research consortium was established between five participating academic centers. Patient selection criteria included high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal carcinoma with at least ten years of follow up. Non-serous, borderline tumors and low-grade serous subtypes were excluded. RESULTS: The 203 identified LT ten-year survivors with HGSC were diagnosed at a median age of 57years (range 37-84years). The majority of patients had stage IIIC (72.4%) disease at presentation. Of those who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 143 (85.6%) patients. After a median follow up of 144months, 88 (46.8%) patients did not develop recurrent disease after initial treatment. Unexpected findings from this survey of LT survivors includes 14% of patients having had suboptimal cytoreduction, 11% of patients having an initial platinum free interval of <12months, and nearly 53% of patients having recurrent disease, yet still surviving more than ten years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: LT survivors of HGSC of the ovary generally have favorable clinical features including optimal surgical cytoreduction and primary platinum sensitive disease. The majority of patients will develop recurrent disease, however many remained disease free for more than 10years. Future work will compare the clinical features of this unusual cohort of LT survivors with the characteristics of HGSC patients having less favorable outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) generally presents at an advanced stage with poor long-term (LT) survival. Here we describe clinical features found in women surviving HGSC for ten or more years. METHODS: A multi-center research consortium was established between five participating academic centers. Patient selection criteria included high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal carcinoma with at least ten years of follow up. Non-serous, borderline tumors and low-grade serous subtypes were excluded. RESULTS: The 203 identified LT ten-year survivors with HGSC were diagnosed at a median age of 57years (range 37-84years). The majority of patients had stage IIIC (72.4%) disease at presentation. Of those who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 143 (85.6%) patients. After a median follow up of 144months, 88 (46.8%) patients did not develop recurrent disease after initial treatment. Unexpected findings from this survey of LT survivors includes 14% of patients having had suboptimal cytoreduction, 11% of patients having an initial platinum free interval of <12months, and nearly 53% of patients having recurrent disease, yet still surviving more than ten years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: LT survivors of HGSC of the ovary generally have favorable clinical features including optimal surgical cytoreduction and primary platinum sensitive disease. The majority of patients will develop recurrent disease, however many remained disease free for more than 10years. Future work will compare the clinical features of this unusual cohort of LT survivors with the characteristics of HGSC patients having less favorable outcomes.
Authors: Sebastian Vaughan; Jermaine I Coward; Robert C Bast; Andy Berchuck; Jonathan S Berek; James D Brenton; George Coukos; Christopher C Crum; Ronny Drapkin; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Michael Friedlander; Hani Gabra; Stan B Kaye; Chris J Lord; Ernst Lengyel; Douglas A Levine; Iain A McNeish; Usha Menon; Gordon B Mills; Kenneth P Nephew; Amit M Oza; Anil K Sood; Euan A Stronach; Henning Walczak; David D Bowtell; Frances R Balkwill Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Joyce N Barlin; Petar Jelinic; Narciso Olvera; Faina Bogomolniy; Maria Bisogna; Fanny Dao; Richard R Barakat; Dennis S Chi; Douglas A Levine Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jason A Lachance; Asim F Choudhri; Marc Sarti; Susan C Modesitt; Amir A Jazaeri; George J Stukenborg Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Joyce N Barlin; Changhong Yu; Emily K Hill; Oliver Zivanovic; Valentin Kolev; Douglas A Levine; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Jae Huh; Richard R Barakat; Michael W Kattan; Dennis S Chi Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Roel G W Verhaak; Pablo Tamayo; Ji-Yeon Yang; Diana Hubbard; Hailei Zhang; Chad J Creighton; Sian Fereday; Michael Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Craig H Mermel; Aleksandar D Kostic; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Gordon Saksena; Kristian Cibulskis; Sekhar Duraisamy; Keren Levanon; Carrie Sougnez; Aviad Tsherniak; Sebastian Gomez; Robert Onofrio; Stacey Gabriel; Lynda Chin; Nianxiang Zhang; Paul T Spellman; Yiqun Zhang; Rehan Akbani; Katherine A Hoadley; Ari Kahn; Martin Köbel; David Huntsman; Robert A Soslow; Anna Defazio; Michael J Birrer; Joe W Gray; John N Weinstein; David D Bowtell; Ronny Drapkin; Jill P Mesirov; Gad Getz; Douglas A Levine; Matthew Meyerson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: J N Barlin; K C Long; E J Tanner; G J Gardner; M M Leitao; D A Levine; Y Sonoda; N R Abu-Rustum; R R Barakat; D S Chi Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lauren A Baldwin; Bin Huang; Rachel W Miller; Thomas Tucker; Scott T Goodrich; Iwona Podzielinski; Christopher P DeSimone; Fred R Ueland; John R van Nagell; Leigh G Seamon Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: David D Bowtell; Steffen Böhm; Ahmed A Ahmed; Paul-Joseph Aspuria; Robert C Bast; Valerie Beral; Jonathan S Berek; Michael J Birrer; Sarah Blagden; Michael A Bookman; James D Brenton; Katherine B Chiappinelli; Filipe Correia Martins; George Coukos; Ronny Drapkin; Richard Edmondson; Christina Fotopoulou; Hani Gabra; Jérôme Galon; Charlie Gourley; Valerie Heong; David G Huntsman; Marcin Iwanicki; Beth Y Karlan; Allyson Kaye; Ernst Lengyel; Douglas A Levine; Karen H Lu; Iain A McNeish; Usha Menon; Steven A Narod; Brad H Nelson; Kenneth P Nephew; Paul Pharoah; Daniel J Powell; Pilar Ramos; Iris L Romero; Clare L Scott; Anil K Sood; Euan A Stronach; Frances R Balkwill Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Susan K Lutgendorf; Eileen Shinn; Jeanne Carter; Susan Leighton; Keith Baggerly; Michele Guindani; Bryan Fellman; Marianne Matzo; George M Slavich; Marc T Goodman; William Tew; Jenny Lester; Kathleen M Moore; Beth Y Karlan; Douglas A Levine; Anil K Sood Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Andrew Bryant; Shaun Hiu; Patience T Kunonga; Ketankumar Gajjar; Dawn Craig; Luke Vale; Brett A Winter-Roach; Ahmed Elattar; Raj Naik Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-09-26
Authors: C A Hamilton; A Miller; Y Casablanca; N S Horowitz; B Rungruang; T C Krivak; S D Richard; N Rodriguez; M J Birrer; F J Backes; M A Geller; M Quinn; M J Goodheart; D G Mutch; J J Kavanagh; G L Maxwell; M A Bookman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Sweta Sinha; Mary K Townsend; Brooke L Fridley; Beth Y Karlan; Susan K Lutgendorf; Eileen Shinn; Anil K Sood; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Martin Köbel; Holly R Harris; Andrew Berchuck; Mary Anne Rossing; Joellen M Schildkraut; Jennifer A Doherty Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Renée T Fortner; Elizabeth M Poole; Nicolas A Wentzensen; Britton Trabert; Emily White; Alan A Arslan; Alpa V Patel; V Wendy Setiawan; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans-Olov Adami; Amanda Black; Leslie Bernstein; Louise A Brinton; Julie Buring; Tess V Clendenen; Agnès Fournier; Gary Fraser; Susan M Gapstur; Mia M Gaudet; Graham G Giles; Inger T Gram; Patricia Hartge; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Annika Idahl; Rudolf Kaaks; Victoria A Kirsh; Synnove Knutsen; Woon-Puay Koh; James V Lacey; I-Min Lee; Eva Lundin; Melissa A Merritt; Roger L Milne; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Ulrike Peters; Jenny N Poynter; Sabina Rinaldi; Kim Robien; Thomas Rohan; Maria-José Sánchez; Catherine Schairer; Leo J Schouten; Anne Tjonneland; Mary K Townsend; Ruth C Travis; Antonia Trichopoulou; Piet A van den Brandt; Paolo Vineis; Lynne Wilkens; Alicja Wolk; Hannah P Yang; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Christopher B Morse; Valentin Voillet; Breanna M Bates; Edison Y Chiu; Nicolas M Garcia; Raphael Gottardo; Philip D Greenberg; Kristin G Anderson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 5.304