Literature DB >> 23672929

Optimal (≤1 cm) but visible residual disease: is extensive debulking warranted?

J N Barlin1, K C Long, E J Tanner, G J Gardner, M M Leitao, D A Levine, Y Sonoda, N R Abu-Rustum, R R Barakat, D S Chi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if extensive upper abdominal surgery (UAS) affected overall survival (OS) in patients left with ≤ 1 cm but visible residual disease after undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Our secondary objective was to determine if leaving ≤ 1cm but visible residual throughout the small bowel (SB) conferred a worse prognosis.
METHODS: All stage IIIB-IV ovarian cancer patients who had visible but ≤ 1 cm residual disease at time of primary cytoreductive surgery from 2001 to 2010 were identified. Extensive UAS procedures and residual SB involvement were recorded.
RESULTS: The 219 patients identified with ≤1 cm but visible residual disease had a median OS of 51 months. In this cohort, 127 had extensive UAS performed, and 87 had residual disease involving the SB. Univariate OS analysis was performed. There was no significant difference in OS between patients who did or did not have extensive UAS (45 vs. 52 months, P=0.56), or between patients with or without residual SB disease (45 vs. 51 months, P=0.84). Factors that were significantly associated with OS were age, ASA score, family history, and stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients cytoreduced to ≤ 1 cm but visible residual disease who required UAS did not have a worse OS than those who did not require UAS. OS was similar if residual disease involved the SB or not. For ovarian cancer patients with disease not amenable to complete gross resection, extensive surgery should still be considered to achieve ≤ 1 cm but visible residual disease status, including cases where the residual disease involves the SB.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extensive surgery; Ovarian cancer; Overall survival; Small bowel

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23672929     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Predictive modeling for determination of microscopic residual disease at primary cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 Study.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; G Larry Maxwell; Austin Miller; Chad A Hamilton; Bunja Rungruang; Noah Rodriguez; Scott D Richard; Thomas C Krivak; Jeffrey M Fowler; David G Mutch; Linda Van Le; Roger B Lee; Peter Argenta; David Bender; Krishnansu S Tewari; David Gershenson; James J Java; Michael A Bookman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Characteristics of 10-year survivors of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Fanny Dao; Brooke A Schlappe; Jill Tseng; Jenny Lester; Alpa M Nick; Susan K Lutgendorf; Scott McMeekin; Robert L Coleman; Kathleen N Moore; Beth Y Karlan; Anil K Sood; Douglas A Levine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shaun Hiu; Andrew Bryant; Ketankumar Gajjar; Patience T Kunonga; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-30

4.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mueller; Amelia Kelly; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Oliver Zivanovic; Dennis S Chi; Ginger J Gardner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cummings; Olivia Nicolais; Mark Shahin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

6.  Diaphragmatic Surgery and Related Complications In Primary Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuang Ye; Tiancong He; Shanhui Liang; Xiaojun Chen; Xiaohua Wu; Huijuan Yang; Libing Xiang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Dual-platform affinity proteomics identifies links between the recurrence of ovarian carcinoma and proteins released into the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Florian Finkernagel; Silke Reinartz; Maximiliane Schuldner; Alexandra Malz; Julia M Jansen; Uwe Wagner; Thomas Worzfeld; Johannes Graumann; Elke Pogge von Strandmann; Rolf Müller
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Radical surgery versus standard surgery for primary cytoreduction of bulky stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer: an observational study.

Authors:  Yulan Ren; Rong Jiang; Sheng Yin; Chao You; Dongli Liu; Xi Cheng; Jie Tang; Rongyu Zang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.