Literature DB >> 26966213

Draft Genome Sequences of Strains Representing Each of the Elizabethkingia Genomospecies Previously Determined by DNA-DNA Hybridization.

Ainsley C Nicholson1, Ben W Humrighouse2, James C Graziano2, Brian Emery2, John R McQuiston2.   

Abstract

Draft genome sequences of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and representatives of each of its four historically described genomospecies were sequenced here. Preliminary analysis suggests that Elizabethkingia miricola belongs to genomospecies 2, and both Elizabethkingia anophelis and Elizabethkingia endophytica are most similar to genomospecies 1.
Copyright © 2016 Nicholson et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26966213      PMCID: PMC4786648          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00045-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Patients infected with various Elizabethkingia strains have a high mortality rate, with reports of 25% for adults undergoing dialysis (1) and up to 57% for neonates with meningitis (2). Isolates from this genus are phenotypically very similar (3) but can be separated into five groups distinguished by DNA-DNA hybridization (4, 5). The type species Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (labeled here as KC1913) was transferred from Chryseobacterium to the Elizabethkingia genus in 2005, when the second species of the genus, Elizabethkingia miricola, was published (6). The third species, Elizabethkingia anophelis, was described in 2011 (7), and the fourth, Elizabethkingia endophytica, was described in 2015 (8). However, no comparisons have been made to date between the latter three species and the original genomospecies determined by DNA-DNA hybridization. Each of the five Elizabethkingia isolates that was used previously as the reference genome for DNA-DNA hybridization experiments (5) was grown on heart infusion agar supplemented with 5% rabbit blood agar (RBA) at 35°C. DNA was extracted using the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) bacterial DNA isolation cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (9). Libraries were prepared using the TruSeq DNA sample prep kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and sequence reads were generated using the Illumina MiSeq instrument (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Assemblies were prepared using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 7.51 assembler (CLC bio, Waltham, MA), with automated settings using reads that were trimmed for quality (limit, 0.05%) and had adapters removed and then mapped back to contigs. Low-coverage contigs and contigs <500 bp were excluded. Sequence reads from the type strain of E. miricola were downloaded from the GenBank Sequence Read Archive (accession no. DRR016064) and assembled similarly. 16S rRNA gene sequences were extracted from each of the assemblies, aligned with gene sequences for the type strains of E. meningoseptica, E. anophelis, and E. endophytica that were in the public domain, and a neighbor-joining tree was generated (data not shown). While a comprehensive comparison of Elizabethkingia genomes is forthcoming, this preliminary analysis suggested that E. miricola is most similar to genomospecies 2, while both E. anophelis and E. endophytica are most similar to genomospecies 1. The 16S rRNA sequence from the recently published draft genome of Elizabethkingia strain ATCC 33958 (10) was an exact match to the gene from Elizabethkingia genomospecies 3.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The complete genome sequences have been deposited at GenBank under BioProject no. PRJNA301708. The accession and BioSample numbers for each strain are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 

BioSample and accession numbers for each Elizabethkingia strain

StrainElizabethkingia organismBioSample no.Accession no.
KC1913E. meningosepticaSAMN04254555LNOH00000000
0422Elizabethkingia genomospecies 1SAMN04254539LNOG00000000
G4071Elizabethkingia genomospecies 2SAMN04254557LNOI00000000
G4075Elizabethkingia genomospecies 3SAMN04254558LNOJ00000000
G4122Elizabethkingia genomospecies 4SAMN04254563LNOK00000000
BioSample and accession numbers for each Elizabethkingia strain
  9 in total

1.  Genetic heterogeneity of Flavobacterium meningosepticum demonstrated by DNA-DNA hybridization.

Authors:  J Ursing; B Bruun
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1987-02

2.  Elizabethkingia endophytica sp. nov., isolated from Zea mays and emended description of Elizabethkingia anophelisKämpfer et al. 2011.

Authors:  Peter Kämpfer; Hans-Jürgen Busse; John A McInroy; Stefanie P Glaeser
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Elizabethkingia anophelis sp. nov., isolated from the midgut of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Peter Kämpfer; Holly Matthews; Stefanie P Glaeser; Karin Martin; Nicole Lodders; Ingrid Faye
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 4.  Chryseobacterium meningosepticum: an emerging pathogen among immunocompromised adults. Report of 6 cases and literature review.

Authors:  K C Bloch; R Nadarajah; R Jacobs
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Transfer of Chryseobacterium meningosepticum and Chryseobacterium miricola to Elizabethkingia gen. nov. as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica comb. nov. and Elizabethkingia miricola comb. nov.

Authors:  Kwang Kyu Kim; Myung Kyum Kim; Ju Hyoung Lim; Hye Yoon Park; Sung-Taik Lee
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Phenotypic characterization of Flavobacterium meningosepticum strains identified by DNA-DNA hybridization.

Authors:  B Bruun; J Ursing
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1987-02

7.  DNA-DNA hybridization study of strains of Chryseobacterium, Elizabethkingia and Empedobacter and of other usually indole-producing non-fermenters of CDC groups IIc, IIe, IIh and IIi, mostly from human clinical sources, and proposals of Chryseobacterium bernardetii sp. nov., Chryseobacterium carnis sp. nov., Chryseobacterium lactis sp. nov., Chryseobacterium nakagawai sp. nov. and Chryseobacterium taklimakanense comb. nov.

Authors:  B Holmes; A G Steigerwalt; A C Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Draft Genome Sequence of Strain ATCC 33958, Reported To Be Elizabethkingia miricola.

Authors:  Stephanie A Matyi; Peter R Hoyt; Patricia Ayoubi-Canaan; Nabeeh A Hasan; John E Gustafson
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-07-23

9.  Elizabethkingia meningoseptica: Emerging nosocomial pathogen in bedside hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  M S Ratnamani; Ratna Rao
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09
  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  A Real-Time Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Elizabethkingia Species and Differentiation between Elizabethkingia anophelis and E. meningoseptica.

Authors:  Aubree J Kelly; Sandor E Karpathy; Christopher A Gulvik; Melissa L Ivey; Anne M Whitney; Melissa E Bell; Ainsley C Nicholson; Ben W Humrighouse; John R McQuiston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Revisiting the taxonomy of the genus Elizabethkingia using whole-genome sequencing, optical mapping, and MALDI-TOF, along with proposal of three novel Elizabethkingia species: Elizabethkingia bruuniana sp. nov., Elizabethkingia ursingii sp. nov., and Elizabethkingia occulta sp. nov.

Authors:  Ainsley C Nicholson; Christopher A Gulvik; Anne M Whitney; Ben W Humrighouse; James Graziano; Brian Emery; Melissa Bell; Vladimir Loparev; Phalasy Juieng; Jarrett Gartin; Chantal Bizet; Dominique Clermont; Alexis Criscuolo; Sylvain Brisse; John R McQuiston
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Comparative Genomics and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Elizabethkingia Isolates Reveal Nosocomial Transmission and In Vitro Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones, Tetracyclines, and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  Delaney Burnard; Letitia Gore; Andrew Henderson; Ama Ranasinghe; Haakon Bergh; Kyra Cottrell; Derek S Sarovich; Erin P Price; David L Paterson; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Draft Genome Sequence of Elizabethkingia anophelis Strain EM361-97 Isolated from the Blood of a Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Chih-Hui Yang; Chung-Hsu Lai; Yi-Han Huang; Hsi-Hsun Lin
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-10-27

5.  Pathogenic Elizabethkingia miricola Infection in Cultured Black-Spotted Frogs, China, 2016.

Authors:  Ruixue Hu; Junfa Yuan; Yin Meng; Zhe Wang; Zemao Gu
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Complete Genome Sequence of Elizabethkingia miricola Strain EM798-26 Isolated from the Blood of a Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Chung-Hsu Lai; Chih-Hui Yang; Yi-Han Huang; Hsi-Hsun Lin
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2018-01-04

7.  Insights from the draft genome into the pathogenicity of a clinical isolate of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica Em3.

Authors:  Shicheng Chen; Marty Soehnlen; Frances P Downes; Edward D Walker
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2017-09-16

8.  The draft genomes of Elizabethkingia anophelis of equine origin are genetically similar to three isolates from human clinical specimens.

Authors:  William L Johnson; Akhilesh Ramachandran; Nathanial J Torres; Ainsley C Nicholson; Anne M Whitney; Melissa Bell; Aaron Villarma; Ben W Humrighouse; Mili Sheth; Scot E Dowd; John R McQuiston; John E Gustafson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Complete Genome Sequences of Four Strains from the 2015-2016 Elizabethkingia anophelis Outbreak.

Authors:  Ainsley C Nicholson; Anne M Whitney; Brian D Emery; Melissa E Bell; Jarrett T Gartin; Ben W Humrighouse; Vladimir N Loparev; Dhwani Batra; Mili Sheth; Lori A Rowe; Phalasy Juieng; Kristen Knipe; Christopher Gulvik; John R McQuiston
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-06-16

10.  Comparison of four automated microbiology systems with 16S rRNA gene sequencing for identification of Chryseobacterium and Elizabethkingia species.

Authors:  Jiun-Nong Lin; Chung-Hsu Lai; Chih-Hui Yang; Yi-Han Huang; Hsiu-Fang Lin; Hsi-Hsun Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.