| Literature DB >> 28932346 |
Shicheng Chen1, Marty Soehnlen2, Frances P Downes3, Edward D Walker1.
Abstract
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is an emerging, healthcare-associated pathogen causing a high mortality rate in immunocompromised patients. We report the draft genome sequence of E. meningoseptica Em3, isolated from sputum from a patient with multiple underlying diseases. The genome has a length of 4,037,922 bp, a GC-content 36.4%, and 3673 predicted protein-coding sequences. Average nucleotide identity analysis (>95%) assigned the bacterium to the species E. meningoseptica. Genome analysis showed presence of the curli formation and assembly operon and a gene encoding hemagglutinins, indicating ability to form biofilm. In vitro biofilm assays demonstrated that E. meningoseptica Em3 formed more biofilm than E. anophelis Ag1 and E. miricola Emi3, both lacking the curli operon. A gene encoding thiol-activated cholesterol-dependent cytolysin in E. meningoseptica Em3 (potentially involved in lysing host immune cells) was also absent in E. anophelis Ag1 and E. miricola Emi3. Strain Em3 showed α-hemolysin activity on blood agar medium, congruent with presence of hemolysin and cytolysin genes. Furthermore, presence of heme uptake and utilization genes demonstrated adaptations for bloodstream infections. Strain Em3 contained 12 genes conferring resistance to β-lactams, including β-lactamases class A, class B, and metallo-β-lactamases. Results of comparative genomic analysis here provide insights into the evolution of E. meningoseptica Em3 as a pathogen.Entities:
Keywords: Draft genome; Elizabethkingia meningoseptica; Human isolate; Infections
Year: 2017 PMID: 28932346 PMCID: PMC5602931 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0269-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Fig. 1Demonstration of cell growth, pigment production and micrograph. a Em3 growing on SBA medium; b Demonstration of Em3 grown on SBA medium (control, up part) and MacConkey agar (low part). c Pigment production in Em3 grown on TSA agar. d Scanning electron microscopy image of Em3
Classification and general features of E. meningoseptica Em3
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence codea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum | TAS [ | ||
| Class | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Strain Em3 | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | Negative | IDA | |
| Cell shape | Rod | IDA | |
| Motility | Non motile | IDA | |
| Sporulation | Non-spore-forming | NAS | |
| Temperature range | 4–40 °C | IDA | |
| Optimum temperature | 37 °C | IDA | |
| pH range; Optimum | 4–10; 8 | IDA | |
| Carbon source | Heterotroph | IDA | |
| Energy source | Varied; including glucose and mannitol | IDA | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | Human | NAS |
| MIGS-6.3 | Salinity | Not determined | |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | Aerobic | NAS |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | Free-living | NAS |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | Pathogen | NAS |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Michigan, USA | NAS |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection time | February, 6, 2016 | NAS |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | 42° 43′ 57″ N | NAS |
| MIGS-4.2 | Longitude | 84° 33′ 20″ W | NAS |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | Not reported | NAS |
aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [41]
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree displays the position of E. meningoseptica Em3 (shown in bold) relative to the other type strains of Elizabethkingia based on 16S rRNA. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA v. 7.0.14 using the Neighbor-Joining method [42]. The percentage of replicate trees where the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is indicated next to the branches. The branch lengths are scaled to the same units as those of the evolutionary distances for inferring the phylogenetic tree. The accession numbers for 16 s rRNA sequences are listed in the parenthesis following selected bacteria: E. meningoseptica LMG 12279 (NR_115236), E. meningoseptica Che01 (KX774527), E. meningoseptica NBRC 12535 (NR_113592), E. meningoseptica ATCC 13253T (NR_115201), E. meningoseptica JL1 (JN201943), E. meningoseptica YMC R3259 (KP836320), E. meningoseptica Em3, E. meningoseptica 16H-201 M0546 (KX774526), E. miricola YMC R1459 (KP844567), E. miricola BM10T (CP011059), E. miricola EM_CHUV (CM003640), E. miricola YMC R1241 (KP836321), E. miricola ATCC 33958 (NZ_JRFN00000000), E. meningoseptica pp5b (GQ360070), E. anophelis NUHP1 (NUHP1_00209), E. anophelis PW2809 (NZ_CBYE010000032), E. anophelis 5.20 (EF426427), E. anophelis R26T (NR_116021), E. anophelis Endophthalmitis (JSAA01000000), Elizabethkingia endophytica JM-87T (NR_136481), Elizabethkingia endophytica F3201 (CP016374.1), E. anophelis B2D (NZ_JNCG00000000) and Riemerella anatipestifer ATCC 11845T (NC_017045)
Percentage of in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH)a and average nucleotide identities (ANI)b among the selected Elizabethkingia genomes
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nucleotide sequences were downloaded from GenBank. The accession numbers for E. anophelis R26T, E. meningoseptica ATCC 13253T, E. miricola BM10T and E. endophytica JM-87T are NZ_ANIW01000001.1, NZ_ASAN01000001.1, NZ_CP011059.1 and NZ_CP016372, respectively
aIn silico DNA-DNA hybridization was calculated by using Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) [47]. The percentage of DDH was shown on the top and bolded
bANI values were computed for pairwise genome comparison with using the OrthoANIu algorithm [48]. The percentage of ANI was shown on the bottom
Project information
| MIGS ID | Property | Term |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS 31 | Finishing quality | High-quality draft |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | two paired-end 250 bp library |
| MIGS 29 | Sequencing platforms | MiSeq-Illumina |
| MIGS 31.2 | Fold coverage | 50.0X |
| MIGS 30 | Assemblers | SPAdes 3.9.0 |
| MIGS 32 | Gene calling method | NCBI Prokaryotic Genome, Annotation Pipeline |
| Locus Tag | BFF93_ | |
| Genbank ID | MDTY00000000.1 | |
| GenBank Date of Release | October 25, 2016 | |
| GOLD ID | Gp0172366 | |
| BIOPROJECT | PRJNA338129 | |
| MIGS 13 | Source Material Identifier | CL16–200185 |
| Project relevance | Clinical pathogen |
Genome statistics of E. meningoseptica Em3
| Attribute | Value | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 4,037,922 | 100 |
| DNA coding (bp) | 3,571,073 | 88.44 |
| DNA G + C (bp) | 1,468,714 | 36.37 |
| DNA scaffolds | 11 | NA |
| Total genes | 3729 | 100 |
| Protein coding genes | 3673 | 98.50 |
| RNA genes | 56 | 1.50 |
| Pseudo genes | 0 | 0 |
| Genes in internal clusters | 752 | 20.17 |
| Genes with function prediction | 2585 | 69.32 |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 1993 | 53.45 |
| Genes with Pfam domains | 2740 | 73.48 |
| Genes with signal peptides | 452 | 12.12 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 818 | 21.94 |
| CRISPR repeats | 0 | 0 |
Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
| Code | Value | %age | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 186 | 8.58 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 0 | 0 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 170 | 7.84 | Transcription |
| L | 91 | 4.20 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 0 | 0 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 21 | 0.97 | Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| V | 81 | 3.74 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 82 | 3.78 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 184 | 8.49 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
| N | 10 | 0.46 | Cell motility |
| U | 17 | 0.78 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| O | 110 | 5.08 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 106 | 4.89 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 120 | 5.54 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 184 | 8.49 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 60 | 2.77 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 134 | 6.18 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 96 | 4.43 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 153 | 7.06 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 39 | 1.80 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 203 | 9.37 | General function prediction only |
| S | 105 | 4.85 | Function unknown |
| – | 1736 | 46.55 | Not in COGs |
Fig. 3In vitro biofilm assay in the selected Elizabethkingia sp. The cells were first cultured by shaking in TSB at 37 °C overnight. The cell density was adjusted to the same OD at 600 nm (0.1). 200 μl of cells were placed on 96-well plates for 24 h. The biofilm assay was carried out using crystal blue staining [49]. Values are mean values for single measurements from eight independent cultures. The error bars are standard deviations. The statistical test was the Student’s t-test. The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared to biofilm formation in E. anophelis Ag1 (p < 0.05).
Antibiotic genes prediction
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus number | Gene in Em3 | Putative function | Em3 | 502 | R26 | NUHP1 | ATCC 33958 | EM_CHUV |
| β-lactam | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS01220 |
| Class B carbapenemase BlaGOB-13 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS04805 | – | β-lactamase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS05700 | – | β-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.6) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS07625 |
| β-lactamase (BlaACME) VEB-1-like | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS06860 |
| BJP β-lactamase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS09265 | – | MBL fold metallo-hydrolase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS06995 | – | β-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.6) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS14540 | – | β-lactamase | + | + | + | + | – | + |
| BFF93_RS12085 | – | β-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.6) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS12510 | – | MBL fold metallo-hydrolase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS14000 |
| Class B carbapenemase BlaB-9 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS01365 | – | β-lactamase (EC 3.5.2.6) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Sulfonamide | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS00125 | dhfR | Dihydrofolate reductase DHFR | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS17395 | – | Bifunctional deaminase-reductase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS00125 |
| Dihydrofolate reductase DHFR | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS17395 | – | Bifunctional deaminase-reductase protein | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS14765 |
| Dihydropteroate synthase FolP (EC 2.5.1.15) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tetracycline | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS08380 |
| Tetracycline efflux protein TetA | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS07335 | – | Transmembrane efflux protein | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS12745 | – | Antibiotic transporter | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Macrolide | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS00370 |
| Macrolide resistance, ABC transporter | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS05670 |
| Erythromycin resistance, EmrB/QacA | + | + | – | – | + | + |
| BFF93_RS05670 |
| Erythromycin resistance, EmrB/QacA | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS10830 |
| Erythromycin resistance, EmrB/QacA | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS03320 | – | Erythromycin esterase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Quinolone | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS04670 |
| DNA gyrase GyrA subunit A (T83S) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS09245 |
| DNA gyrase GyrB subunit A (M437 L) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS08895 |
| DNA topoisomerase IV subunit B (M437F/A473L) | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Aminoglycoside | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS10790 |
| Aminoglycoside 6-adenylyltransferase | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Chloramphenicol | ||||||||
| BFF93_RS14765 |
| Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase CatB | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| BFF93_RS04080 |
| Bcr/CflA efflux pump | + | + | + | + | + | + |
“+” or “-” indicates the presence or absence of genes in the selected Elizabethkingia