Literature DB >> 26965438

Podokinetic circular vection: characteristics and interaction with optokinetic circular vection.

W Becker1, K Kliegl2, J Kassubek3,4, R Jürgens3.   

Abstract

Stabilising horizontal body orientation in space without sight on a rotating platform by holding to a stationary structure and circular 'treadmill' stepping in the opposite direction can elicit an illusion of self-turning in space (Bles and Kapteyn in Agressologie 18:325-328, 1977). Because this illusion is analogous to the well-known illusion of optokinetic circular vection (oCV), we call it 'podokinetic circular vection' (pCV) here. Previous studies using eccentric stepping on a path tangential to the rotation found that pCV was always contraversive relative to platform rotation. In contrast, when our subjects stepped at the centre of rotation about their vertical axis, we observed an inverted, ipsiversive pCV as a reproducible trait in many of our subjects. This ipCV occurred at the same latency as the pCV of subjects reporting the actually expected contraversive direction, but had lower gain. In contrast to pCV, the nystagmus accompanying circular treadmill stepping had the same direction in all individuals (slow phase in the direction of platform motion). The direction of an individual's pCV predicted the characteristics of the CV resulting from combined opto- and podokinetic stimulation (circular treadmill stepping while viewing a pattern rotating together with the platform): in individuals with contraversive pCV, latency shortened and both gain and felt naturalness increased in comparison with pure oCV, whereas the opposite (longer latency, reduced gain and naturalness) occurred in individuals with ipCV. Taken together, the reproducibility of ipCV, the constant direction of nystagmus and the fact that pCV direction predicts the outcome of combined stimulation suggest that ipCV is an individual trait of many subjects during compensatory stepping at the centre of rotation. A hypothetical model is presented of how ipCV possibly could arise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bimodal stimulation; Circular treadmill stepping; Circular vection; Inverted vection; Optokinetic stimulation; Podokinetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26965438     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4604-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Podokinetic after-rotation does not depend on sensory conflict.

Authors:  R Jürgens; T Boss; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer's self-motion--a report of a new motion illusion: inverted vection.

Authors:  S Nakamura; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: a review.

Authors:  Aleksander Väljamäe
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2009-07-18

5.  Integration of visual and inertial cues in the perception of angular self-motion.

Authors:  K N de Winkel; F Soyka; M Barnett-Cowan; H H Bülthoff; E L Groen; P J Werkhoven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motion habituation: inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after-nystagmus.

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans; W Büchle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  [Sensation of rotation and circular walking].

Authors:  W Bles; G de Wit
Journal:  Agressologie       Date:  1978

8.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues.

Authors:  S H Seidman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Combined effects of auditory and visual cues on the perception of vection.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Lawrence J Hettinger; Daniel Vena; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Robert S Allison; Mark M Schira; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Stepping in Place While Voluntarily Turning Around Produces a Long-Lasting Posteffect Consisting in Inadvertent Turning While Stepping Eyes Closed.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Podokinetic After-Rotation Is Transiently Enhanced or Reversed by Unilateral Axial Muscle Proprioceptive Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Assessing the contribution of active somatosensory stimulation to self-acceleration perception in dynamic driving simulators.

Authors:  Mattia Bruschetta; Ksander N de Winkel; Enrico Mion; Paolo Pretto; Alessandro Beghi; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.