Literature DB >> 10541753

Podokinetic after-rotation does not depend on sensory conflict.

R Jürgens1, T Boss, W Becker.   

Abstract

Humans who have been stepping for 10 min or more about their vertical axis on a counterrotating platform while fixating on a stationary visual scene continue to circle in the same direction when they attempt, thereafter, to step on firm ground in darkness without turning ("podokinetic after-rotation": PKAR). In the present report, we investigate whether PKAR is due to: (1) a sensory reinterpretation triggered by the conflict between the visual signal of stationarity and the somatosensory message of feet-on-platform rotation, or (2) an adaptation of the somatosensory afferents to prolonged unilateral stimulation irrespective of visual stimulation. Subjects (Ss) circled for 10 min about their vertical axis on an either stationary or counterrotating platform while they were either in darkness, or exposed to an optokinetic stimulus, or to a "head-fixed" stationary pattern. Thereafter, Ss first stood motionless in darkness for 30 s, allowing vestibular after-effects to decay, and then tried (still without vision) to step in place on the stationary platform without turning while their body rotation was recorded by a potentiometer coupled to the head. All conditions involving podomotor activity without concomitant optokinetic stimulation evoked similar PKAR. With optokinetic stimulation, PKAR became larger, apparently because it was summed with an optokinetically induced after-rotation (oPKAR). This oPKAR could be demonstrated in isolation when Ss were passively rotated in front of the OKN-pattern instead of actively circling. PKAR could not be "dumped"; it reappeared after 30 s of straight stepping under visual control. We suggest that PKAR is caused by adaptation of the somatosensory channel and not by a sensory conflict.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541753     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  Postural reorientation does not cause the locomotor after-effect following rotary locomotion.

Authors:  Callum J Osler; Raymond F Reynolds
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Podokinetic stimulation causes shifts in perception of straight ahead.

Authors:  John T Scott; Corey A Lohnes; Fay B Horak; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of vision on adaptive postural responses following standing on an incline.

Authors:  Gammon M Earhart; Josée M Henckens; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vestibular-Podokinetic interaction without vestibular perception.

Authors:  G Melvill Jones; W A Fletcher; K D Weber; E W Block
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Exposure to a rotating virtual environment during treadmill locomotion causes adaptation in heading direction.

Authors:  A P Mulavara; J T Richards; T Ruttley; A Marshburn; Y Nomura; J J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Walking and running on the circular treadmill: transition speed and podokinetic aftereffects.

Authors:  Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  The interplay between strategic and adaptive control mechanisms in plastic recalibration of locomotor function.

Authors:  Jason T Richards; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Podokinetic after-rotation in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Minna Hong; Joel S Perlmutter; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Podokinetic circular vection: characteristics and interaction with optokinetic circular vection.

Authors:  W Becker; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; R Jürgens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The broken escalator phenomenon. Aftereffect of walking onto a moving platform.

Authors:  R F Reynolds; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.