Literature DB >> 26964929

Effect of non-acoustic parameters on heterogeneous sonoporation mediated by single-pulse ultrasound and microbubbles.

Peng Qin1, Lin Xu2, Tao Han3, Lianfang Du4, Alfred C H Yu5.   

Abstract

Sonoporation-transient plasma membrane perforation elicited by the interaction of ultrasound waves with microbubbles--has shown great potential for drug delivery and gene therapy. However, the heterogeneity of sonoporation introduces complexities and challenges in the realization of controllable and predictable drug delivery. The aim of this investigation was to understand how non-acoustic parameters (bubble related and bubble-cell interaction parameters) affect sonoporation. Using a customized ultrasound-exposure and fluorescence-imaging platform, we observed sonoporation dynamics at the single-cell level and quantified exogenous molecular uptake levels to characterize the degree of sonoporation. Sonovue microbubbles were introduced to passively regulate microbubble-to-cell distance and number, and bubble size. 1 MHz ultrasound with 10-cycle pulse duration and 0.6 MPa peak negative pressure were applied to trigger the inertial collapse of microbubbles. Our data revealed the impact of non-acoustic parameters on the heterogeneity of sonoporation. (i) The localized collapse of relatively small bubbles (diameter, D<5.5 μm) led to predictable sonoporation, the degree of which depended on the bubble-to-cell distance (d). No sonoporation was observed when d/D>1, whereas reversible sonoporation occurred when d/D<1. (ii) Large bubbles (D>5.5 μm) exhibited translational movement over large distances, resulting in unpredictable sonoporation. Translation towards the cell surface led to variable reversible sonoporation or irreversible sonoporation, and translation away from the cell caused either no or reversible sonoporation. (iii) The number of bubbles correlated positively with the degree of sonoporation when D<5.5 μm and d/D<1. Localized collapse of two to three bubbles mainly resulted in reversible sonoporation, whereas irreversible sonoporation was more likely following the collapse of four or more bubbles. These findings offer useful insight into the relationship between non-acoustic parameters and the degree of sonoporation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Acoustic cavitation; Heterogeneous sonoporation; Microbubbles; Non-acoustic parameters; Ultrasound

Year:  2015        PMID: 26964929     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem        ISSN: 1350-4177            Impact factor:   7.491


  12 in total

1.  Ultrasound Imaging of Microbubble Activity during Sonoporation Pulse Sequences.

Authors:  Sara Keller; Matthew Bruce; Michalakis A Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Zoe Krut; Dan Gazit; Zulma Gazit; Gadi Pelled
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joseph Rich; Zhenhua Tian; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-09-14

4.  An evaluation of the sonoporation potential of low-boiling point phase-change ultrasound contrast agents in vitro.

Authors:  Samantha M Fix; Anthony Novell; Yeoheung Yun; Paul A Dayton; Christopher B Arena
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2017-01-24

5.  Dynamic Fluorescence Microscopy of Cellular Uptake of Intercalating Model Drugs by Ultrasound-Activated Microbubbles.

Authors:  B H A Lammertink; R Deckers; M Derieppe; I De Cock; I Lentacker; G Storm; C T W Moonen; C Bos
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Sonoporation-induced cell membrane permeabilization and cytoskeleton disassembly at varied acoustic and microbubble-cell parameters.

Authors:  Maochen Wang; Yi Zhang; Chenliang Cai; Juan Tu; Xiasheng Guo; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spatial-Temporal Cellular Bioeffects from Acoustic Droplet Vaporization.

Authors:  Ching-Hsiang Fan; Yi-Ting Lin; Yi-Ju Ho; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Clinical study of ultrasound and microbubbles for enhancing chemotherapeutic sensitivity of malignant tumors in digestive system.

Authors:  Yanjie Wang; Yan Li; Kun Yan; Lin Shen; Wei Yang; Jifang Gong; Ke Ding
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Sonoporation generates downstream cellular impact after membrane resealing.

Authors:  Xinxing Duan; Qian Zhou; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Setup for Microscopic Studies of Ultrasounds Effects on Microliters Scale Samples: Analytical, Numerical and Experimental Characterization.

Authors:  Florian N Gailliègue; Mindaugas Tamošiūnas; Franck M André; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.