Literature DB >> 33664315

Sonoporation generates downstream cellular impact after membrane resealing.

Xinxing Duan1,2, Qian Zhou2, Jennifer M F Wan3, Alfred C H Yu4.   

Abstract

Sonoporation via microbubble-mediated ultrasound exposure has shown potential in drug and gene delivery. However, there is a general lack of mechanistic knowledge on sonoporation-induced cellular impact after membrane resealing, and this issue has made it challenging to apply sonoporation efficiently in practice. Here, we present new evidence on how sonoporation, without endangering immediate cell viability, may disrupt downstream cellular hemostasis in ways that are distinguished from the bioeffects observed in other sonicated and unsonoporated cells. Sonoporation was realized on HL-60 leukemia cells by delivering pulsed ultrasound (1 MHz frequency, 0.50 MPa peak negative pressure; 10% duty cycle; 30 s exposure period; 29.1 J/cm2 acoustic energy density) in the presence of lipid-shelled microbubbles (1:1 cell-to-bubble ratio). Results showed that 54.6% of sonoporated cells, despite remaining initially viable, underwent apoptosis or necrosis at 24 h after sonoporation. Anti-proliferation behavior was also observed in sonoporated cells as their subpopulation size was reduced by 43.8% over 24 h. Preceding these cytotoxic events, the percentages of sonoporated cells in different cell cycle phases were found to be altered by 12 h after exposure. As well, for sonoporated cells, their expressions of cytoprotective genes in the heat shock protein-70 (HSP-70) family were upregulated by at least 4.1 fold at 3 h after exposure. Taken altogether, these findings indicate that sonoporated cells attempted to restore homeostasis after membrane resealing, but many of them ultimately failed to recover. Such mechanistic knowledge should be taken into account to devise more efficient sonoporation-mediated therapeutic protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33664315      PMCID: PMC7933147          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84341-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  41 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 2.  The human HSP70 family of chaperones: where do we stand?

Authors:  Jürgen Radons
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress by sonoporation: linkage to mitochondria-mediated apoptosis initiation.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhong; Xian Chen; Pingping Jiang; Jennifer M F Wan; Peng Qin; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation.

Authors:  Yaxin Hu; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Single-site sonoporation disrupts actin cytoskeleton organization.

Authors:  Xian Chen; Ruen Shan Leow; Yaxin Hu; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Sonoporation induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human promyelocytic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhong; Wai Hung Sit; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 7.  Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved, and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound.

Authors:  Loreto B Feril; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  A preclinical evaluation of Minnelide as a therapeutic agent against pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rohit Chugh; Veena Sangwan; Satish P Patil; Vikas Dudeja; Rajinder K Dawra; Sulagna Banerjee; Robert J Schumacher; Bruce R Blazar; Gunda I Georg; Selwyn M Vickers; Ashok K Saluja
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 9.  Microbubble-mediated ultrasound therapy: a review of its potential in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Carolyn E Schutt; Sadik Esener
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Reparable Cell Sonoporation in Suspension: Theranostic Potential of Microbubble.

Authors:  S Moosavi Nejad; Hamid Hosseini; Hidenori Akiyama; Katsuro Tachibana
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joseph Rich; Zhenhua Tian; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-09-14

2.  Synergistic enhancement of cell death by triple combination therapy of docetaxel, ultrasound and microbubbles, and radiotherapy on PC3 a prostate cancer cell line.

Authors:  Firas Almasri; Raffi Karshafian
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 3.  The cellular response to plasma membrane disruption for nanomaterial delivery.

Authors:  Kevin Braeckmans; Winnok H De Vos; Gaëlle Houthaeve; Stefaan C De Smedt
Journal:  Nano Converg       Date:  2022-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.