| Literature DB >> 26964043 |
Troy E Sandberg1, Christopher P Long2, Jacqueline E Gonzalez2, Adam M Feist1,3, Maciek R Antoniewicz2, Bernhard O Palsson1,3.
Abstract
13C-Metabolic flux analysis (13C-MFA) traditionally assumes that kinetic isotope effects from isotopically labeled compounds do not appreciably alter cellular growth or metabolism, despite indications that some biochemical reactions can be non-negligibly impacted. Here, populations of Escherichia coli were adaptively evolved for ~1000 generations on uniformly labeled 13C-glucose, a commonly used isotope for 13C-MFA. Phenotypic characterization of these evolved strains revealed ~40% increases in growth rate, with no significant difference in fitness when grown on either labeled (13C) or unlabeled (12C) glucose. The evolved strains displayed decreased biomass yields, increased glucose and oxygen uptake, and increased acetate production, mimicking what is observed after adaptive evolution on unlabeled glucose. Furthermore, full genome re-sequencing revealed that the key genetic changes underlying these phenotypic alterations were essentially the same as those acquired during adaptive evolution on unlabeled glucose. Additionally, glucose competition experiments demonstrated that the wild-type exhibits no isotopic preference for unlabeled glucose, and the evolved strains have no preference for labeled glucose. Overall, the results of this study indicate that there are no significant differences between 12C and 13C-glucose as a carbon source for E. coli growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26964043 PMCID: PMC4786092 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Fitness trajectories.
Growth rates of the evolving strains over the course of the ALE as they adapted to growth on 13C glucose.
Fig 2Phenotypic characterization of the wild-type and evolved strains.
(A) Growth rates on 12C-glucose and 13C-glucose. (B) Biomass yields on 13C-glucose. (C) Glucose uptake rates on 13C-glucose. (D) Acetate production rates on 13C-glucose. (E) Oxygen uptake rates on 13C-glucose. All error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3).
Mutations identified in the endpoints of the 13C-evolution.
| Mutation | Gene | Protein change | ALE1 | ALE2 | ALE3 | ALE4 | ALE5 | ALE6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G→T | V13L (GTG→TTG) | X | ||||||
| T→G | intergenic (-142/-72) | X | ||||||
| IS2 | intergenic (-75/-526) | X | ||||||
| IS1 | intergenic (-112/-486) | X | ||||||
| IS1 | intergenic (-116/-481) | X | ||||||
| IS5 | intergenic (-258/-344) | X | ||||||
| G→C | pseudogene (664/957 nt) | X | ||||||
| T→C | V429A (GTT→GCT) | X | X | |||||
| T→C | F431L (TTT→CTT) | X | X | |||||
| C→T | Y432Y (TAC→TAT) | X | X | |||||
| C→A | G438G (GGC→GGA) | X | X | |||||
| C→T | L443L (CTC→CTT) | X | X | |||||
| Δ6 bp | coding (778-783/939 nt) | X | ||||||
| +GGCTGTCA | coding (32/702 nt) | X | ||||||
| T→G | intergenic (+59/-65) | X | ||||||
| +C | coding (2425/2757 nt) | X | ||||||
| T→A | Q538L (CAG→CTG) | X | ||||||
| Δ13 bp | coding (414-426/807 nt) | X | ||||||
| Δ1 bp | intergenic (-41/+54) | X | X | |||||
| Δ82 bp | intergenic | X | X | X | ||||
| +CCTGGC | coding (771/1263 nt) | X | ||||||
| C→T | T657I (ACC→ATC) | X | ||||||
| G→T | G1189C (GGT→TGT) | X | X | X | X | |||
| +9 bp | coding (749/4224 nt) | X | ||||||
| G→T | P481T (CCT→ACT) | X |
a IS = insertion sequence
Fig 3Mutational frequency in evolved endpoint strains.
Comparison of the most frequently mutated genes observed in evolved endpoint strains grown on either 12C-glucose or 13C-glucose.
Measurement of slipped-strand mispairing mutation rates.
| Switch frequency ± SD (* 10−4) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Blue—> White | White—> Blue | |
| 52.1 ± 5.6 | 31.0 ± 10.5 | |
| 54.1 ± 9.2 | 36.7 ± 4.7 | |
| 55.5 ± 14.6 | 22.3 ± 4.1 | |
a Reference: [18]
Fig 4Glucose competition.
Results of glucose competition experiments, where the medium contained a mixture of 12C-glucose and 13C-glucose. Profiles of total glucose concentration and labeling ratio are shown for the WT (A) and one representative ALE strain culture (B). The estimated glucose preference factor “f” reflects the preference for 12C-glucose vs. 13C-glucose (C). An f-value of 1 reflects no preference, greater than one reflects a preference for 12C-glucose, and less than one a preference for 13C-glucose.