Literature DB >> 28455337

Laboratory Evolution to Alternating Substrate Environments Yields Distinct Phenotypic and Genetic Adaptive Strategies.

Troy E Sandberg1, Colton J Lloyd1, Bernhard O Palsson1,2, Adam M Feist3,2.   

Abstract

Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments are often designed to maintain a static culturing environment to minimize confounding variables that could influence the adaptive process, but dynamic nutrient conditions occur frequently in natural and bioprocessing settings. To study the nature of carbon substrate fitness tradeoffs, we evolved batch cultures of Escherichia coli via serial propagation into tubes alternating between glucose and either xylose, glycerol, or acetate. Genome sequencing of evolved cultures revealed several genetic changes preferentially selected for under dynamic conditions and different adaptation strategies depending on the substrates being switched between; in some environments, a persistent "generalist" strain developed, while in another, two "specialist" subpopulations arose that alternated dominance. Diauxic lag phenotype varied across the generalists and specialists, in one case being completely abolished, while gene expression data distinguished the transcriptional strategies implemented by strains in pursuit of growth optimality. Genome-scale metabolic modeling techniques were then used to help explain the inherent substrate differences giving rise to the observed distinct adaptive strategies. This study gives insight into the population dynamics of adaptation in an alternating environment and into the underlying metabolic and genetic mechanisms. Furthermore, ALE-generated optimized strains have phenotypes with potential industrial bioprocessing applications.IMPORTANCE Evolution and natural selection inexorably lead to an organism's improved fitness in a given environment, whether in a laboratory or natural setting. However, despite the frequent natural occurrence of complex and dynamic growth environments, laboratory evolution experiments typically maintain simple, static culturing environments so as to reduce selection pressure complexity. In this study, we investigated the adaptive strategies underlying evolution to fluctuating environments by evolving Escherichia coli to conditions of frequently switching growth substrate. Characterization of evolved strains via a number of different data types revealed the various genetic and phenotypic changes implemented in pursuit of growth optimality and how these differed across the different growth substrates and switching protocols. This work not only helps to establish general principles of adaptation to complex environments but also suggests strategies for experimental design to achieve desired evolutionary outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; adaptive laboratory evolution; adaptive mutations; phenotypic variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455337      PMCID: PMC5478979          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00410-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  52 in total

1.  Evolution of a single niche specialist in variable environments.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Jasmin; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift.

Authors:  Ana Solopova; Jordi van Gestel; Franz J Weissing; Herwig Bachmann; Bas Teusink; Jan Kok; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Escherichia coli populations in unpredictably fluctuating environments evolve to face novel stresses through enhanced efflux activity.

Authors:  S M Karve; S Daniel; Y D Chavhan; A Anand; S S Kharola; S Dey
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Demand theory of gene regulation. II. Quantitative application to the lactose and maltose operons of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M A Savageau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms.

Authors:  Adam M Feist; Markus J Herrgård; Ines Thiele; Jennie L Reed; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism--2011.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Orth; Tom M Conrad; Jessica Na; Joshua A Lerman; Hojung Nam; Adam M Feist; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Adaptive evolution of the lactose utilization network in experimentally evolved populations of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Selwyn Quan; J Christian J Ray; Zakari Kwota; Trang Duong; Gábor Balázsi; Tim F Cooper; Russell D Monds
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Evolution of E. coli on [U-13C]Glucose Reveals a Negligible Isotopic Influence on Metabolism and Physiology.

Authors:  Troy E Sandberg; Christopher P Long; Jacqueline E Gonzalez; Adam M Feist; Maciek R Antoniewicz; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  solveME: fast and reliable solution of nonlinear ME models.

Authors:  Laurence Yang; Ding Ma; Ali Ebrahim; Colton J Lloyd; Michael A Saunders; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Pseudomonad reverse carbon catabolite repression, interspecies metabolite exchange, and consortial division of labor.

Authors:  Heejoon Park; S Lee McGill; Adrienne D Arnold; Ross P Carlson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Fast growth phenotype of E. coli K-12 from adaptive laboratory evolution does not require intracellular flux rewiring.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Jacqueline E Gonzalez; Adam M Feist; Bernhard O Palsson; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 3.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Escherichia coli cultures maintain stable subpopulation structure during long-term evolution.

Authors:  Megan G Behringer; Brian I Choi; Samuel F Miller; Thomas G Doak; Jonathan A Karty; Wanfeng Guo; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dissecting the genetic and metabolic mechanisms of adaptation to the knockout of a major metabolic enzyme in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Jacqueline E Gonzalez; Adam M Feist; Bernhard O Palsson; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology.

Authors:  Troy E Sandberg; Michael J Salazar; Liam L Weng; Bernhard O Palsson; Adam M Feist
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 7.  Eco-evolutionary causes and consequences of temporal changes in intratumoural blood flow.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Joel S Brown; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Adaptive laboratory evolution of Escherichia coli under acid stress.

Authors:  Bin Du; Connor A Olson; Anand V Sastry; Xin Fang; Patrick V Phaneuf; Ke Chen; Muyao Wu; Richard Szubin; Sibei Xu; Ye Gao; Ying Hefner; Adam M Feist; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.777

9.  Diauxic lags explain unexpected coexistence in multi-resource environments.

Authors:  Blox Bloxham; Hyunseok Lee; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 13.068

10.  Molecular signatures of resource competition: Clonal interference favors ecological diversification and can lead to incipient speciation.

Authors:  Massimo Amicone; Isabel Gordo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.