| Literature DB >> 26963912 |
Sung-Wan Kim1, Min Jhon1, Jae-Min Kim1, Stefan Smesny2, Simon Rice3, Michael Berk3,4, Claudia M Klier5, Patrick D McGorry3, Miriam R Schäfer3, G Paul Amminger3,5.
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between erythrocyte membrane fatty acid (FA) levels and the severity of symptoms of individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis. Subjects of the present study consisted of 80 neuroleptic-naïve UHR patients. Partial correlation coefficients were calculated between baseline erythrocyte membrane FA levels, measured by gas chromatography, and scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after controlling for age, sex, smoking and cannabis use. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the predominance of positive or negative symptoms based on PANSS subscale scores; membrane FA levels in the three groups were then compared. More severe negative symptoms measured by PANSS were negatively correlated with two saturated FAs (myristic and margaric acids), one ω-9 monounsaturated FA (MUFA; nervonic acid), and one ω-3 polyunsaturated FA (PUFA; docosapentaenoic acid), and were positively correlated with two ω-9 MUFAs (eicosenoic and erucic acids) and two ω-6 PUFAs (γ-linolenic and docosadienoic acids). More severe positive symptoms measured by PANSS were correlated only with nervonic acid. No associations were observed between FAs and MADRS scores. In subjects with predominant negative symptoms, the sum of the ω-9 MUFAs and the ω-6:ω-3 FA ratio were both significantly higher than in those with predominant positive symptoms, whereas the sum of ω-3 PUFAs was significantly lower. In conclusion, abnormalities in FA metabolism may contribute to the neurobiology of psychopathology in UHR individuals. In particular, membrane FA alterations may play a role in negative symptoms, which are primary psychopathological manifestations of schizophrenia-related disability.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26963912 PMCID: PMC4786267 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Partial correlations coefficients between erythrocyte membrane phosphatidylethanolamine lipids and psychiatric measures controlling for age, sex, smoking, and cannabis use.
| PANSS | MADRS | GAF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Positive | Negative | General | |||
| Myristic acid (14:0) | -.085 | -.177 | .176 | |||
| Palmitic acid (16:0) | -.167 | -.082 | -.196 | -.120 | -.027 | -.017 |
| Margaric acid (17:0) | .058 | .051 | .069 | |||
| Stearic acid (18:0) | .085 | -.083 | .101 | .119 | .008 | -.085 |
| Oleic acid (18:1n-9) | -.029 | .047 | .030 | .010 | .106 | .023 |
| Eicosenoic acid (20:1n-9) | .128 | -.004 | -.193 | |||
| Mead acid (20:3n-9) | .198 | .052 | .205 | .187 | .124 | -.043 |
| Erucic acid (22:1n-9) | . | .158 | .072 | -.182 | ||
| Nervonic acid (24:1n-9) | -.185 | .108 | ||||
| Linoleic acid (18:2n-6) | -.019 | -.063 | .006 | -.012 | -.012 | .044 |
| γ-Linolenic acid (18:3n-6) | .109 | .160 | -.139 | |||
| Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (20:3n-6) | -.029 | -.128 | .081 | -.066 | -.108 | .202 |
| Arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) | -.030 | .046 | -.036 | -.049 | -.080 | .073 |
| Docosadienoic acid (22:2n-6) | .118 | .096 | ||||
| Adrenic acid (22:4n-6) | .104 | .104 | .108 | .061 | -.088 | -.082 |
| α-Linolenic acid (18:3n-3) | -.074 | -.131 | -.079 | -.015 | -.157 | .126 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) | -.085 | .004 | -.149 | -.040 | .144 | .039 |
| Docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-3) | -.215 | -.052 | -.165 | -.088 | .199 | |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) | -.075 | .072 | -.173 | -.031 | .058 | .070 |
| Sum of monounsaturated fatty acids | .184 | .098 | .220 | .125 | .100 | -.051 |
| Sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids | -.028 | .031 | -.035 | -.039 | -.078 | .103 |
| Sum of n-6 fatty acids | .022 | .028 | .051 | -.013 | -.102 | .069 |
| Sum of n-3 fatty acids | -.146 | .021 | -.089 | .017 | .133 | |
| n-6 to n-3 fatty acids ratio | .057 | .165 | .052 | -.189 | ||
* p-value < 0.05
** p-value < 0.01
*** p-value < 0.001
PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale’ GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning
Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of participants according to dominance of positive or negative symptoms.
| Total | Subtypes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 80) | Positive dominant[a] (N = 38) | Mixed[b] (N = 23) | Negative dominant[c] (N = 19) | ||
| Sex, female, n | 54 (67.5) | 26 (68.4) | 16 (69.6) | 12 (60.0) | 0.764 |
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 16.5 (2.1) | 16.6 (2.2) | 16.6 (2.7) | 16.1 (1.3) | 0.651 |
| Alcohol | 0.949 | ||||
| Less than weekly | 45 (56.3) | 22 (57.9) | 12 (52.2) | 12 (60.0) | |
| 1–6 drinks per week | 21 (26.3) | 10 (26.3) | 7 (30.4) | 4 (20.0) | |
| Daily | 14 (17.5) | 6 (15.8) | 4 (17.4) | 4 (20.0) | |
| Cannabis | 0.410 | ||||
| No | 68 (85.0) | 33 (93.5) | 19 (82.6) | 17 (85.0) | |
| ≤ 2g per week | 8 (10.0) | 2 (6.5) | 4 (17.4) | 2 (10.0) | |
| > 2g per week | 4 (5.0) | 3 (0.0) | 0 (7.7) | 1 (5.0) | |
| Smoking, yes, n (%) | 42 (52.5) | 17 (45.2) | 12 (50.0) | 13 (65.2) | 0.340 |
| Any illicit drug, n (%) | 14 (17.5) | 6 (9.7) | 4 (15.4) | 4 (30.4) | 0.922 |
| Transition, yes, n (%) | 13 (16.3) | 4 (10.5) | 4 (17.4) | 5 (25.0) | 0.353 |
| MADRS, score, mean (SD) | 18.2 (8.8) | 16.0 (8.2) | 20.9 (9.8) | 19.2 (7.9) | 0.086 |
| GAF, score mean (SD) | 60.4 (12.5) | 65.0 (11.4) | 58.3 (13.4) | 54.0 (10.5) | |
†a > c, p-value = 0.004. post-hoc analysis.
MADRS, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale’ GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning
Comparison of erythrocyte membrane phosphatidylethanolamine lipids levels according to dominance of positive or negative symptoms.
| Subtypes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive dominant[a] (N = 38) | Mixed[b] (N = 23) | Negative dominant[c] (N = 19) | Post-hoc analysis(Bonferroni correction) | ||
| Myristic acid (14:0) | 0.59 (0.21) | 0.54 (0.16) | 0.48 (0.15) | 0.102 | |
| Palmitic acid (16:0) | 23.64 (3.16) | 23.97 (2.04) | 22.45 (2.41) | 0.168 | |
| Margaric acid (17:0) | 2.50 (0.55) | 2.27 (0.67) | 1.94 (0.50) | a>c | |
| Stearic acid (18:0) | 12.04 (2.36) | 12.99 (2.52) | 12.14 (1.85) | 0.278 | |
| Oleic acid (18:1n-9) | 22.96 (2.58) | 23.08 (2.56) | 24.07 (3.57) | 0.366 | |
| Eicosenoic acid (20:1n-9) | 0.76 (0.31) | 0.92 (0.38) | 1.24 (0.40) | a<c | |
| Mead acid (20:3n-9) | 0.11 (0.50) | 0.12 (0.47) | 0.13 (0.40) | 0.313 | |
| Erucic acid (22:1n-9) | 0.65 (0.91) | 1.04 (1.01) | 1.38 (0.78) | a<c | |
| Nervonic acid (24:1n-9) | 0.06 (0.02) | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.05 (0.15) | 0.219 | |
| Linoleic acid (18:2n-6) | 6.26 (0.69) | 5.91 (0.79) | 6.69 (2.26) | 0.142 | |
| r-Linolenic acid (18:3n-6) | 0.33 (0.13) | 0.41 (0.16) | 0.45 (0.14) | a<c | |
| Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (20:3n-6) | 1.61 (0.42) | 1.62 (0.43) | 1.70 (0.34) | 0.722 | |
| Arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) | 15.95 (2.11) | 14.95 (2.04) | 15.35 (2.02) | 0.180 | |
| Docosadienoic acid (22:2n-6) | 0.06 (0.05) | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.04) | a<c | |
| Adrenic acid (22:4n-6) | 4.69 (0.71) | 4.61 (1.10) | 4.78 (0.82) | 0.824 | |
| a-Linolenic acid (18:3n-3) | 0.19 (0.05) | 0.21 (0.08) | 0.19 (0.43) | 0.543 | |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) | 0.50 (0.17) | 0.49 (0.17) | 0.43 (0.13) | 0.270 | |
| Docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-3) | 2.25 (0.36) | 2.18 (0.53) | 2.02 (0.37) | 0.150 | |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) | 2.83 (0.80) | 2.51 (0.73) | 2.36 (0.50) | 0.050 | |
| Sum of monounsaturated fatty acids | 26.45 (3.01) | 27.13 (2.98) | 28.78 (3.11) | a<c | |
| Sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids | 34.79 (3.30) | 33.10 (3.48) | 34.22 (2.42) | 0.138 | |
| Sum of n-6 fatty acids | 28.90 (2.72) | 27.60 (2.80) | 29.09 (2.19) | 0.113 | |
| Sum of n-3 fatty acids | 5.77 (1.09) | 5.39 (1.31) | 5.00 (0.76) | a>c | |
| n-6 to n-3 fatty acids ratio | 5.13 (0.80) | 5.38 (1.23) | 5.94 (1.00) | a<c | |
* p-value < 0.05
** p-value < 0.01
*** p-value < 0.001