Literature DB >> 24065868

Adults show less sensitivity to phonetic detail in unfamiliar words, too.

Katherine S White1, Eiling Yee, Sheila E Blumstein, James L Morgan.   

Abstract

Young word learners fail to discriminate phonetic contrasts in certain situations, an observation that has been used to support arguments that the nature of lexical representation and lexical processing changes over development. An alternative possibility, however, is that these failures arise naturally as a result of how word familiarity affects lexical processing. In the present work, we explored the effects of word familiarity on adults' use of phonetic detail. Participants' eye movements were monitored as they heard single-segment onset mispronunciations of words drawn from a newly learned artificial lexicon. In Experiment 1, single-feature onset mispronunciations were presented; in Experiment 2, participants heard two-feature onset mispronunciations. Word familiarity was manipulated in both experiments by presenting words with various frequencies during training. Both word familiarity and degree of mismatch affected adults' use of phonetic detail: in their looking behavior, participants did not reliably differentiate single-feature mispronunciations and correct pronunciations of low frequency words. For higher frequency words, participants differentiated both 1- and 2-feature mispronunciations from correct pronunciations. However, responses were graded such that 2-feature mispronunciations had a greater effect on looking behavior. These experiments demonstrate that the use of phonetic detail in adults, as in young children, is affected by word familiarity. Parallels between the two populations suggest continuity in the architecture underlying lexical representation and processing throughout development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial lexicon; Developmental continuity; Phonetic sensitivity; Spoken word recognition; Visual world paradigm; Word familiarity

Year:  2013        PMID: 24065868      PMCID: PMC3779480          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  33 in total

1.  PsyScript: a Macintosh application for scripting experiments.

Authors:  Timothy C Bates; Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

2.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

3.  Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

4.  Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Boaz M Ben-David; Craig G Chambers; Meredyth Daneman; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Eyal M Reingold; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

9.  Studies on the categorization of speech by infants.

Authors:  J L Miller; P D Eimas
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-03

10.  Vowel categorization during word recognition in bilingual toddlers.

Authors:  Marta Ramon-Casas; Daniel Swingley; Núria Sebastián-Gallés; Laura Bosch
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-08-27

2.  Fourteen-month-old infants learn similar-sounding words.

Authors:  Katherine A Yoshida; Christopher T Fennell; Daniel Swingley; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-04

3.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Difficulty in learning similar-sounding words: A developmental stage or a general property of learning?

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Sarah C Creel; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Learning novel phonological neighbors: Syntactic category matters.

Authors:  Isabelle Dautriche; Daniel Swingley; Anne Christophe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-24

6.  Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Linye Jing; Maria I Grigos
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Two-year-olds interpret novel phonological neighbors as familiar words.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-07

8.  Infant word recognition: Insights from TRACE simulations.

Authors:  Julien Mayor; Kim Plunkett
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Learning a Talker or Learning an Accent: Acoustic Similarity Constrains Generalization of Foreign Accent Adaptation to New Talkers.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Event-related potentials reveal limited readiness to access phonetic details during word processing in dogs.

Authors:  L Magyari; Zs Huszár; A Turzó; A Andics
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.