Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Current Status of Supplemental Screening in Dense Breasts.

Literature DB >> 26962096

Current Status of Supplemental Screening in Dense Breasts.

Wendie A Berg¹.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical Disease Gene Species

Year: 2016 PMID： 26962096 PMCID： PMC5474360 DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8674

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN： 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544

× No keyword cloud information.

30 in total

Review 1. Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US imaging: how is it performed and what are the outcomes to date?

Authors: Wendie A Berg; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 11.105

2. Survival benefit in women with BRCA1 mutation or familial risk in the MRI screening study (MRISC).

Authors: Sepideh Saadatmand; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Emiel J Rutgers; Jan C Oosterwijk; Rob A Tollenaar; Gwendolyn H Woldringh; Elisabeth Bergers; Cornelis Verhoef; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Maartje J Hooning; Harry J de Koning; Madeleine M Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 7.396

3. Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors: Ellen Warner; Kimberley Hill; Petrina Causer; Donald Plewes; Roberta Jong; Martin Yaffe; William D Foulkes; Parviz Ghadirian; Henry Lynch; Fergus Couch; John Wong; Frances Wright; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 44.544

4. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review.

Authors: P B Gordon; S L Goldenberg
Journal: Cancer Date: 1995-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860

5. Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affects the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs.

Authors: László Tabár; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Wendy Yi-Ying Wu; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; May Mei-Sheng Ku; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal: Breast J Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 2.431

6. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors: Gretchen L Gierach; Laura Ichikawa; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise A Brinton; Ghada N Farhat; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Catherine Schairer; Stephen H Taplin; Mark E Sherman
Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 13.506

7. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors: Pavel Crystal; Selwyn D Strano; Semyon Shcharynski; Michael J Koretz
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.959

8. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Authors: Margarita L Zuley; Ben Guo; Victor J Catullo; Denise M Chough; Amy E Kelly; Amy H Lu; Grace Y Rathfon; Marion Lee Spangler; Jules H Sumkin; Luisa P Wallace; Andriy I Bandos
Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 11.105

9. Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography.

Authors: Min Sun Bae; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Won Hwa Kim; Nariya Cho; Ann Yi; Bo La Yun; Su Hyun Lee; Mi Young Kim; Eun Bi Ryu; Mirinae Seo
Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 11.105

10. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.

Authors: Vittorio Corsetti; Nehmat Houssami; Aurora Ferrari; Marco Ghirardi; Sergio Bellarosa; Osvaldo Angelini; Claudio Bani; Pasquale Sardo; Giuseppe Remida; Enzo Galligioni; Stefano Ciatto
Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 9.162

17 in total

Review 1. Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors: Christopher L Vaughan
Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.242

2. Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.

Authors: A Thomas Stavros; Andrea G Freitas; Giselle G N deMello; Lora Barke; Dennis McDonald; Terese Kaske; Ducly Wolverton; Arnold Honick; Daniela Stanzani; Adriana H Padovan; Ana Paula C Moura; Marilia C V de Campos
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 5.315

3. Revamp governance of Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: Martin J Yaffe
Journal: CMAJ Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 8.262

4. The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy.

Authors: Loren Saulsberry; Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 5.128

5. Accuracy and reading time for six strategies using digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.

Authors: Alberto Stefano Tagliafico; Massimo Calabrese; Bianca Bignotti; Alessio Signori; Erica Fisci; Federica Rossi; Francesca Valdora; Nehmat Houssami
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 5.315