Literature DB >> 24956046

Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US imaging: how is it performed and what are the outcomes to date?

Wendie A Berg1, Ellen B Mendelson.   

Abstract

Breast density-inform legislation is increasing the need for data on outcomes of tailored screening. Dense parenchyma can mask cancers, and denser tissue is also more likely to develop breast cancer than fatty tissue. Digital mammography is standard for women with dense breasts. Supplemental screening magnetic resonance imaging should be offered to women who meet high-risk criteria. Supplemental screening ultrasonographic (US) imaging may be appropriate in the much larger group of women with dense breasts. Both physician- and technologist-performed screening US imaging increases detection of node-negative invasive breast cancer. To meet anticipated demand in the United States, screening US images will most likely be acquired by trained technologists rather than physicians. While automated US offers standard documentation, there are few data on outcomes. US has been used diagnostically for decades to characterize masses seen by using mammography, but training specific to screening has been lacking. Standard approaches to training and documentation of technologist-performed handheld screening US imaging are needed. This article reviews the current status of technologist-performed handheld screening breast US imaging. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24956046     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic workup and costs of a single supplemental molecular breast imaging screen of mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Michael K O'Connor; James P Moriarty; Judy C Boughey; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Effect of training on ultrasonography (US) BI-RADS features for radiology residents: a multicenter study comparing performances after training.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Hye Sun Lee; You Me Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Sung Hun Kim; Sun Hye Jeong; Ji Young Hwang; Jin Hee Moon; Young Mi Park; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Current Status of Supplemental Screening in Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

7.  Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Mary W Marsh; Thad Benefield; Elizabeth Pearsall; Danielle Durham; Bruce F Schroeder; J Michael Bowling; Cheryl A Viglione; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Breast density implications and supplemental screening.

Authors:  Athina Vourtsis; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Retroareolar Carcinomas in Breast Ultrasound: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Romuald Ferré; Martine Paré; Lisa Smith; Mélanie Thériault; Ann Aldis; Ellen Kao; Benoit Mesurolle
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Medical auditing of whole-breast screening ultrasonography.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.