| Literature DB >> 26962086 |
Gretchen M Cooley1, Oriol Mitja2, Brook Goodhew1, Allan Pillay1, Patrick J Lammie1, Arnold Castro1, Penias Moses3, Cheng Chen1, Tun Ye1, Ronald Ballard1, Diana L Martin4.
Abstract
WHO has targeted yaws for global eradication by 2020. The program goals are to interrupt the transmission in countries where yaws is endemic and to certify countries as yaws free where yaws was endemic in the past. No new rapid plasmin reagin (RPR) seroreactivity in young children is required for certification of elimination at a country level. We sought to evaluate whether antibody responses to specific treponemal antigens measured in a high-throughput multiplex bead array (MBA) assay differentiate past versus current infection and whether a nontreponemal lipoidal antigen test can be incorporated into the MBA. Serum and dried blood spot specimens collected for yaws surveillance projects in Ghana, Vanuatu, and Papua New Guinea (PNG) were run on MBA to measure antibodies against recombinant p17 (rp17) and treponemal membrane protein A (TmpA) treponemal antigens. Results were compared to standard treponemal laboratory (TPPA or TPHA [TPP(H)A]) and quantitative RPR test data. Of 589 specimens, 241 were TPP(H)A(+)/RPR(+), 88 were TPP(H)A(+)/RPR(-), 6 were TPP(H)A(-)/RPR(+), and 254 were negative for both tests. Compared to TPP(H)A, reactive concordance of rp17 was 93.7%, while reactive concordance of TmpA was only 81.9%. TmpA-specific reactivity showed good correlation with RPR titers (R(2) = 0.41; P < 0.0001). IgG responses to the lipoidal antigen used in RPR testing (cardiolipin) were not detected in the MBA. Our results suggest that TmpA can be used as a treponemal antigen marker for recent or active infection and potentially replace RPR in a high-throughput multiplex tool for large-scale yaws surveillance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26962086 PMCID: PMC4844712 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02572-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948
Sensitivities and specificities of antibody responses against treponemal antigens rp17 and TmpA to standard serological tests
| N | rp17 v TPP(H)A (95% CI) | TmpA v TPP(H)A (95% CI) | rp17 v RPR (95% CI) | TmpA v RPR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | |||||
| Total | 587 | 90.1 (86.84–93.28) | 67.47 (62.43–72.51) | 94.8 (92.02–97.54) | 79.9 (74.94–84.9) |
| Ghana | 255 | 95.0 (90.73–99.27) | 89.0 (82.87–96.98) | 98.9 (96.67–100) | 96.6 (92.88–100) |
| Vanuatu | 169 | 89.9 (82.72–96.98) | 50.7 (38.92–62.52) | 88.7 (80.83–96.59) | 56.5 (44.11–68.79) |
| PNG | 163 | 87.1 (81.97–92.25) | 61.3 (53.87–68.83) | 94.9 (90.54–99.26) | 79.6 (71.61–87.57) |
| Specificity | |||||
| Total | 424 | 97.6 (95.79–99.51) | 99.2 (98.14–100) | 92.7 (89.59–95.76) | 98.2 (96.57–99.76) |
| Ghana | 255 | 96.8 (93.99–99.55) | 98.7 (96.93–100) | 92.8 (88.83–96.71) | 97.0 (94.39–99.59) |
| Vanuatu | 169 | 99.0 (97.05–100) | 100.0 (100–100) | 92.5 (87.54–97.5) | 100.0 (94.07–100) |
Dried blood spots or serum were tested for antitreponemal antibodies using a Luminex assay and compared to field-based determination of TPP(H)A or RPR positivity. The number of specimens testing positive or negative by each assay is listed by country. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown in parentheses. PNG specimens were not included in the specificity analysis because only TPHA-positive specimens were sent for testing.
FIG 1Reactivity of rp17 and TmpA by reactivity to standard diagnostics. Responses of TPP(H)A−/RPR−, TPP(H)A+/RPR−, and TPP(H)A+/RPR+ individuals to rp17 (left) and TmpA (right). Symbols represent data from a single individual. Individuals were grouped by reactivity to standard treponemal (TPPA or TPHA) or nontreponemal (RPR) diagnostics tests. Median fluorescent intensities against rp17 and TmpA treponemal antigens were plotted. Dotted lines denote cutoffs for positive responses. n = 586; 6 specimens testing TPP(H)A−/RPR+ were not included.
FIG 2Linear regression analysis of anti-treponemal antibody levels against RPR titers. RPR titers are plotted against antibody responses against rp17 (left) or TmpA (right). Only data from TPP(H)A+ individuals were used in the analysis. Dots represent data from a single individual. The x axes are labeled with RPR titers, and y axes show MFI-BG of anti-treponemal antibody responses. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Slopes of the two curves are significantly different (P < 0.0034). Number of specimens for each group: 88 RPR negative, 24 R1, 8 R2, 24 R4, 41 R8, 32 R16, 41 R32, 46 R64, and 30 R128.