Literature DB >> 26960819

Dose-rate effects in radiation biology and radiation protection.

W Rühm1, T V Azizova2, S D Bouffler3, M P Little4, R E Shore5, L Walsh6, G E Woloschak7.   

Abstract

Quantification of biological effects (cancer, other diseases, and cell damage) associated with exposure to ionising radiation has been a major issue for the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) since its foundation in 1928. While there is a wealth of information on the effects on human health for whole-body doses above approximately 100 mGy, the effects associated with doses below 100 mGy are still being investigated and debated intensively. The current radiological protection approach, proposed by ICRP for workers and the public, is largely based on risks obtained from high-dose and high-dose-rate studies, such as the Japanese Life Span Study on atomic bomb survivors. The risk coefficients obtained from these studies can be reduced by the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) to account for the assumed lower effectiveness of low-dose and low-dose-rate exposures. The 2007 ICRP Recommendations continue to propose a value of 2 for DDREF, while other international organisations suggest either application of different values or abandonment of the factor. This paper summarises the current status of discussions, and highlights issues that are relevant to reassessing the magnitude and application of DDREF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor; Dose-rate effectiveness factor; Linear-non-threshold hypothesis; Low-dose effectiveness factor; Radiation risk

Year:  2016        PMID: 26960819     DOI: 10.1177/0146645316629336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann ICRP        ISSN: 0146-6453


  18 in total

Review 1.  Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective.

Authors:  Werner Rühm; Joachim Breckow; Günter Dietze; Anna Friedl; Rüdiger Greinert; Peter Jacob; Stephan Kistinger; Rolf Michel; Wolfgang-Ulrich Müller; Heinz Otten; Christian Streffer; Wolfgang Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Dose and dose rate extrapolation factors for malignant and non-malignant health endpoints after exposure to gamma and neutron radiation.

Authors:  Van Tran; Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Modeling cell survival and change in amount of DNA during protracted irradiation.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuya; Kaori Tsutsumi; Kohei Sasaki; Yuji Yoshii; Takaaki Kimura; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Mathematical models of tissue stem and transit target cell divisions and the risk of radiation- or smoking-associated cancer.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Jolyon H Hendry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Impact of updating the non-radiation parameters in the ICRP 103 detriment model.

Authors:  Joachim Breckow; Samaneh Emami; Sara Amalhaf; Arwin Beshgard; Jonas Buermeyer; Kaija Spruck
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Cellular responses and gene expression profiles of colonic Lgr5+ stem cells after low-dose/low-dose-rate radiation exposure.

Authors:  Kensuke Otsuka; Keiji Suzuki; Yuki Fujimichi; Masanori Tomita; Toshiyasu Iwasaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Intensity Modulated Radiation Fields Induce Protective Effects and Reduce Importance of Dose-Rate Effects.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuya; Stephen J McMahon; Mihaela Ghita; Yuji Yoshii; Tatsuhiko Sato; Hiroyuki Date; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Analyses of cancer incidence and other morbidities in gamma irradiated B6CF1 mice.

Authors:  Alia Zander; Tatjana Paunesku; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biological effectiveness of very high gamma dose rate and its implication for radiological protection.

Authors:  Dante Olofsson; Lei Cheng; Rubén Barrios Fernández; Magdalena Płódowska; Milagrosa López Riego; Pamela Akuwudike; Halina Lisowska; Lovisa Lundholm; Andrzej Wojcik
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Occupational radiation exposure to nursing staff during cardiovascular fluoroscopic procedures: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly Wilson-Stewart; Madeleine Shanahan; Davide Fontanarosa; Rob Davidson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.