Literature DB >> 26960591

Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation.

Tomoyuki Irino1, Jon A Tsai1,2, Jessica Ericson3, Magnus Nilsson1,2, Lars Lundell1,2, Ioannis Rouvelas4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been met with increased interest for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. One critical obstacle for the implementation of MIE has been the intrathoracic anastomosis. In this study, we describe a technique of thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis using a linear stapler in prone position and present the short-term outcomes of this procedure.
METHODS: This prospective pilot study included 46 consecutive patients with a cancer either of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or the distal esophagus who underwent either total MIE or thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy followed by intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. The short-term outcomes including postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: This pilot study included 41 males (89 %) and 5 females (11 %) with a mean age of 65.7 years. The majority had adenocarcinoma (93 %). Before surgery, 4 patients (8.7 %) had an incomplete endoscopic submucosal resection, 5 patients (11 %) received chemotherapy alone, and 33 patients (71 %) had chemoradiotherapy. Mean operation time was 408 minutes. Postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa or more severe occurred in 7 patients (15 %), of whom 4 patients (8.7 %) developed anastomotic leakages without any need for intensive care. Another 2 patients (4.3 %) required intensive care due to aspiration pneumonia and acute renal failure. No in-hospital mortality was registered. Only one patient (2.2 %) with anastomotic leakage developed postoperative anastomotic stenosis requiring balloon dilatation.
CONCLUSIONS: The intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis technique seems to be feasible, safe, and easy to perform, associated with a limited postsurgical complication rate and a good functional outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrathoracic anastomosis; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Postoperative complication; Side-to-side stapled anastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26960591     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1396-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  25 in total

1.  Intrathoracic linear stapled esophagogastric anastomosis: an alternative to the end to end anastomosis.

Authors:  Lyall A Gorenstein; Marc Bessler; Joshua R Sonett
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Should gastric cardia cancers be treated with esophagectomy or total gastrectomy? A comprehensive analysis of 4,996 NSQIP/SEER patients.

Authors:  Jeremiah T Martin; Angela Mahan; Joseph B Zwischenberger; Patrick C McGrath; Ching-Wei D Tzeng
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis?

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Omar A Jarral; Thanos Athanasiou; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24

Review 4.  Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marc M Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abhishek Sundaram; Juan C Geronimo; Brittany L Willer; Masato Hoshino; Zachary Torgersen; Arpad Juhasz; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.

Authors:  Guilherme M Campos; David Jablons; Lisa M Brown; René M Ramirez; Charlotte Rabl; Pierre Theodore
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?

Authors:  R Rindani; C J Martin; M R Cox
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-03

9.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Quan-Xing Liu; Xu-Feng Deng; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  9 in total

1.  Role of 3D in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Alexandros Charalabopoulos; Bruno Lorenzi; Ali Kordzadeh; Cheuk-Bong Tang; Sritharan Kadirkamanathan; Naga Venkatesh Jayanthi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Magnus Nilsson; Satoshi Kamiya; Mats Lindblad; Ioannis Rouvelas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Esophagectomy-prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Stefano de Pascale
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.

Authors:  Moshim Kukar; Kfir Ben-David; June S Peng; Kristopher Attwood; Ryan M Thomas; Mark Hennon; Chukwumere Nwogu; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: Experience of 251 patients.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Xi Liu; Rong Wang; Yuncang Wang; Tao Zhang; Dewei Gao; Linggen Gao
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-01

Review 6.  Current surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shun Zhang; Hajime Orita; Tetsu Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08-15

7.  Implementation of minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a western tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Andrianos Tsekrekos; Tania Triantafyllou; Fredrik Klevebro; Masaru Hayami; Mats Lindblad; Magnus Nilsson; Lars Lundell; Ioannis Rouvelas
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Incidence and treatment of mediastinal leakage after esophagectomy: Insights from the multicenter study on mediastinal leaks.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Andrea Celotti; Paolo Parise; Andrea Cossu; Luigi Bonavina; Daniele Bernardi; Giovanni de Manzoni; Jacopo Weindelmayer; Giuseppe Verlato; Stefano Santi; Giovanni Pallabazzer; Nazario Portolani; Maurizio Degiuli; Rossella Reddavid; Stefano de Pascale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: operative technique and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Manrica Fabbi; Stefano De Pascale; Filippo Ascari; Wanda Luisa Petz; Uberto Fumagalli Romario
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.