Literature DB >> 26958977

A pictorial presentation of 3.0 Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders.

Fernando Augusto Herbella1, Priscila Rodrigues Armijo1, Marco Giuseppe Patti2.   

Abstract

High resolution manometry changed several esophageal motility paradigms. The 3.0 Chicago Classification defined manometric criteria for named esophageal motility disorders. We present a pictorial atlas of motility disorders. Achalasia types, esophagogastric junction obstruction, absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus (jackhammer), ineffective esophageal motility, and fragmented peristalsis are depicted with high-resolution manometry plots. RESUMO A manometria de alta resolução mudou vários paradigmas da motilidade digestiva. A Classificação de Chicago, na versão 3.0, definiu critérios manométricos para as doenças da motilidade esofagiana. O presente artigo é um atlas das dismotilidades descritas. Tipos de acalásia, obstrução ao nível da junção esofagogástrica, contrações ausentes, espasmo esofagiano distal, esôfago hipercontrátil, motilidade esofagiana ineficaz e peristalse fragmentada são mostradas em traçados de manometria de alta resolução.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26958977      PMCID: PMC5234762          DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082016MD3444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1679-4508


INTRODUCTION

High resolution manometry (Figure 1) has clear and inherent advantages over conventional manometry, despite its higher cost.( High resolution manometry detailed analysis of esophageal peristalsis changed several esophageal motility paradigms, including new manometric parameters and different classification for named “motility disorders based on pressure topography”, the Chicago classification,( which was recently revised.(
Figure 1

Normal high resolution manometry

We present a pictorial atlas of the motility disorders according to the 3.0 Chicago Classification with high-resolution plots.

Achalasia

Chicago Classification divided achalasia into three subtypes according to esophageal pressurization( (Figure 2). Type I is characterized by 100% failed contractions and no esophageal pressurization; type II has panesophageal pressurization in at least 20% of swallows; and type III is defined by the presence of preserved fragments of distal peristalsis or premature contractions for at least 20% of the swallows.( This classification may be applied to Chagas' disease esophagopathy as well, although type III is rarely, if ever, seem.(
Figure 2

Achalasia types

Esophagogastric junction obstruction

Esophagogastric junction obstruction (Figure 3) is characterized by an elevated residual pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) measured by a new and more sophisticated tool, the integrated relaxation pressure( in the absence of criteria for achalasia (absence of peristalsis).( This parameter measures the mean pressure of the 4 seconds of maximal deglutitive relaxation in the 10-second window beginning at the beginning of the swallow (upper sphincter relaxation). It is a rare finding usually present in patients with dysphagia after operations at the esophagogastric junction.(
Figure 3

Esophagogastric junction obstruction in a patient after Nissen operation

Absent contractility

Absent contractility is characterized by aperistalsis in the setting of normal LES relaxation and absence of esophageal pressurization( (Figure 4). This finding may be noticed in patients with connective tissue diseases, end-stage gastroesophageal reflux disease etc.
Figure 4

Absent contractility in a patient with scleroderma

Distal esophageal spasm

Distal esophageal spasm is defined by over 20% of premature contractions as measured by a new parameter, the distal latency (DL) <4.5 seconds( (Figure 5). The DL is the time interval between the beginning of the upper sphincter relaxation and the contractile deceleration point the manometric representation of the transition from the esophageal body to the epiphrenic ampulla regarded as an inflection of the peristaltic axis within 3cm of the proximal margin of the LES.(
Figure 5

Distal esophageal spasm

Hypercontractile esophagus

Hypercontractile esophagus (Jackhammer esophagus) is characterized by at least two swallows with hypercontractility as measured by the distal contractile integral (DCI)( (Figure 6). The DCI measures the contractile vigor combining the amplitude versus duration versus length of the distal esophageal contraction exceeding 20mmHg from the transition zone to the proximal margin of the LES.( Hypercontractility is defined by DCI >8,000mmHg.s.cm.( It may occur with esophagogastric junction obstruction, gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis.(
Figure 6

Hypercontractile esophagus

Ineffective esophageal motility

Ineffective esophageal motility is defined by ≥50% ineffective swallows (failed or weak – DCI <450mmHg.s.cm)( (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Ineffective esophageal motility in a patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Fragmented peristalsis

Fragmented peristalsis ≥50% fragmented contractions with DCI >450mmHg.s.cm( (Figure 8). Although patients with fragmented peristalsis are more prone to have dysphagia,( its clinical significance is still elusive.
Figure 8

Fragmented peristalsis

DISCUSSION

Motility patterns to define named disorders have been motive of controversy since the era of conventional manometry. Different definitions exist although the classification by Richter was the most used by experts.( High resolution manometry seems to bring a more intuitive and reproducible interpretation compared with conventional manometry,( and more sophisticated tools to define old and new manometric parameters. Despite all improvements, and similarity with conventional manometry, some cases are still unclassified, and the real clinical significance of some Chicago Classification disorders is still under investigation.
  12 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT).

Authors:  Sabine Roman; John E Pandolfino; Joan Chen; Lubomyr Boris; Daniel Luger; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  High-resolution manometry classifications for idiopathic achalasia in patients with Chagas' disease esophagopathy.

Authors:  Fernando P P Vicentine; Fernando A M Herbella; Marco E Allaix; Luciana C Silva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; Dustin Carlson; Daniel Luger; Kiran Bidari; Lubomyr Boris; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Oesophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  J E Richter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Learners favour high resolution oesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings.

Authors:  A Samad Soudagar; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Hypercontractile esophagus: Clinical context and motors findings in high resolution manometry.

Authors:  Verónica Martín-Domínguez; María Teresa Pérez-Fernández; Almudena Marinero; Vanesa Jusué-Irurita; María Caldas; Cecilio Santander
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 9.  Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: Outcomes with a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months.

Authors:  Chenghai He; Meng Li; Bin Lu; Xiao Ying; Chen Gao; Shuangshuang Wang; Chengao Ma; Chaoqiong Jin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  A PICTORIAL PRESENTATION OF ESOPHAGEAL HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY CURRENT PARAMETERS.

Authors:  Fernanda M Lafraia; Fernando A M Herbella; Julia R Kalluf; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Understanding the Chicago Classification: From Tracings to Patients.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Fernando A Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.