| Literature DB >> 26958073 |
Jun Yang1, Xiao-Lin Feng1, Yang Yu1, Qi Wang2, Jian Zou1, Chuan-Xi Wang1, Zhen-Qiang Mu1, Xin-Sheng Yao1, Hao Gao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. (Chuanxiong) is a well-known Chinese medicine, and studies on its chemical constituents are important for explaining its mechanism of action and quality control. This study aims to investigate the chemical constituents of the dried rhizome of. L. chuanxiong.Entities:
Keywords: Chuanxiong; Chuanxiongins; Ligusticum chuanxiong; New subtype of phthalides; Phthalide fatty acid esters
Year: 2016 PMID: 26958073 PMCID: PMC4782370 DOI: 10.1186/s13020-016-0080-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Fig. 1Structures of compounds 1–10
1H and 13C NMR data for the phthalide nucleus of 1–8 (CDCl3, δ in ppm, J in Hz)*
| Position |
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 167.7 | 168.9 | 169.6 | 169.4 | ||||
| 3 | 148.2 | 148.3 | 148.3 | 148.1 | ||||
| 3a | 155.2 | 152.9 | 153.7 | 153.3 | ||||
| 4 | 17.8 | 2.48 (dt, 18.5, 5.4) 2.62 (dt, 18.5, 6.9) | 18.3 | 2.51 | 18.9 | 2.41 2.63 (dt, 18.5, 5.8) | 19.1 | 2.51 |
| 5 | 25.8 | 1.99 | 23.1 | 2.00 2.10 | 25.5 | 1.82 2.08 | 26.5 | 1.88 2.06 |
| 6 | 68.5 | 4.08 (dt, 6.0, 3.9) | 72.3 | 5.10 | 67.9 | 4.00 | 71.7 | 3.93 |
| 7 | 67.5 | 5.53 (d, 3.9) | 63.4 | 4.56 (d, 3.9) | 63.0 | 4.59 (d, 3.0) | 67.6 | 4.44 (d, 5.5) |
| 7a | 122.3 | 125.6 | 125.7 | 125.9 | ||||
| 8 | 114.3 | 5.31 (t, 7.9) | 114.5 | 5.31 (t, 7.9) | 114.7 | 5.30 (t, 7.9) | 114.6 | 5.28 (t, 7.9) |
| 9 | 28.2 | 2.36 | 28.3 | 2.37 | 28.2 | 2.34 | 28.2 | 2.33 |
| 10 | 22.4 | 1.50 | 22.4 | 1.51 | 22.4 | 1.49 | 22.4 | 1.47 |
| 11 | 13.9 | 0.95 (t, 7.4) | 13.9 | 0.96 (t, 7.4) | 13.9 | 0.94 (t, 7.4) | 13.9 | 0.93 (t, 7.3) |
* Indiscernible signals owing to overlapping or having complex multiplicity are reported without designating multiplicity
1H and 13C NMR data for the fatty acid moieties of 1–6 (CDCl3, δ in ppm, J in Hz)*
| Position | Palmitoyl for | Oleoyl for | Linoleoyl for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1′ | 174.0 for | 174.0 for | 174.0 for | |||
| 2′ | 34.4 | 2.32 for | 34.4 | 2.33 for | 34.4 | 2.33 for |
| 3′ | 25.0 | 1.62 for | 25.0 | 25.0 | 1.63 for | |
| 4′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 29.2–29.7 | 1.24–1.37 |
| 5′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 29.2–29.7 | 1.24–1.37 |
| 6′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 29.2–29.7 | 1.24–1.37 |
| 7′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 29.2–29.7 | 1.24–1.37 |
| 8′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 27.4 | 2.01 | 27.3 | 2.04 |
| 9′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 129.9 | 5.35 | 130.2 | 5.36 |
| 10′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 130.1 | 5.35 | 128.2 | 5.33 |
| 11′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 27.3 | 2.01 | 25.8 | 2.76 (t, 6.0) |
| 12′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 128.1 | 5.33 |
| 13′ | 29.2–29.8 | 1.22–1.32 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 130.4 | 5.36 |
| 14′ | 32.1 | 1.24 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 27.3 | 2.04 |
| 15′ | 22.8 | 1.27 | 29.2–29.9 | 1.24–1.37 | 29.2–29.7 | 1.24–1.37 |
| 16′ | 14.3 | 0.87 (t, 6.7) | 32.0 | 1.25 | 31.7 | 1.28 |
| 17′ | 22.8 | 1.29 | 22.7 | 1.29 | ||
| 18′ | 14.2 | 0.87 (t, 6.7) | 14.2 | 0.88 (t, 6.8) | ||
* Indiscernible signals owing to overlapping or having complex multiplicity are reported without designating multiplicity
Fig. 2Key HMBC and 1H-1H COSY correlations of 1
Fig. 3Chiral HPLC analytical chromatograms of compounds 1–8. The retention times (min) for the two peaks of compounds 1–6 (95 % MeOH-H2O, 0.7 mL/min; 276 nm) and 7–8 (75 % MeOH-H2O, 0.5 mL/min; 276 nm) are marked on each chromatogram. The letters a–h successively stand for the profiles of 1–8
Fig. 4CD spectra of (+)-1 and (−)-1
Fig. 5The Δδ values of the (S)- and (R)-MTPA esters ((−)-1-a and (−)-1-b) indicating the R configuration of C-6 in (−)-1