| Literature DB >> 30245968 |
Xu Zhang1, Bing Han1, Ziming Feng1, Jianshuang Jiang1, Yanan Yang1, Peicheng Zhang1.
Abstract
Three new thionic compounds, (S)-2-(2-carboxyl-2-hydroxyethylthio)-ferulic acid (1), (E)-2-methoxy-4-(3-(methylsulfonyl)prop-1-en-1-yl)phenol (2), and thiosenkyunolide C (3), together with two new aromatic glycosides (4 and 5) were isolated from the rhizome of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. Two known compounds (6 and 7) were also obtained. Their structures were elucidated based on extensive spectroscopic data (UV, IR, 1D and 2D NMR, and HR-ESI-MS). Furthermore the absolute configurations were established by comparison of their calculated and experimental circular dichroism spectra and by a dimolybdenum tetraacetate [Mo2(AcO)4]-induced circular dichroism procedure. All compounds were evaluated against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced NO production in BV2 cells, and compounds 4 and 5 showed strong inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 2.03 and 3.09 µmol/L, respectively (positive control curcumin, IC50 = 6.17 µmol/L). In addition, compound 1 showed weak proteintyrosine phosphatase-1B (PTP1B) inhibitory activity.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-inflammatory; Aromatic glycosides; Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.; Natural products; Thionic compounds
Year: 2018 PMID: 30245968 PMCID: PMC6147803 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.04.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1The structures of the isolated compounds 1–7.
1H and 13C NMR data of compounds 1, 3 (in DMSO-d6) and 2 (in methanol-d4).
| Position | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 128.7 | 129.6 | 168.1 | |||
| 2 | 130.2 | 7.05, d (1.5) | 110.6 | |||
| 3 | 148.7 | 149.3 | 147.9 | |||
| 3a | 151.6 | |||||
| 4 | 152.3 | 148.6 | 2.44, m | 16.1 | ||
| 5 | 6.89, d (8.5) | 117.4 | 6.76, d (8.0) | 116.4 | 1.82, m | 22.9 |
| 6 | 7.44, d (8.5) | 123.3 | 6.89, dd (1.5, 8.0) | 121.8 | 4.07, brs | 67.5 |
| 7 | 8.18, d (16.0) | 142.4 | 6.68, d (16.0) | 140.5 | 3.52, brs | 41.8 |
| 7a | 124.3 | |||||
| 8 | 6.25, d (16.0) | 117.8 | 6.11, dt (7.5, 16.0) | 113.7 | 5.46, t (8.0) | 112.4 |
| 9 | 167.8 | 3.95, d (7.5) | 59.6 | 2.27, q (8.0) | 27.6 | |
| 10 | 1.47, m | 21.8 | ||||
| 11 | 2.93, s | 39.6 | 0.91, t (7.5) | 13.7 | ||
| 1′ | 2.97, dd (8.0, 13.0); | 39.7 | 2.87, dd (7.0, 12.5); 3.05 dd (3.0, 12.5) | 37.4 | ||
| 3.12, dd (4.5, 13.0) | ||||||
| 2′ | 3.93, dd (4.5, 8.0) | 69.7 | 4.11, brs | 70.7 | ||
| 3′ | 173.9 | 174.0 | ||||
| -OCH3 | 3.76, s | 59.7 | 3.86, s | 56.5 | ||
500 MHz for 1H NMR, 125 MHz for 13C NMR. b600 MHz for 1H NMR, 150 MHz for 13C NMR.
Figure 2Key HMBC correlations of 1—5.
Figure 3The structures of 3Ja and 3Jb.
Figure 4Experimental ECD and calculated ECD spectrum of 3 in MeOH.
1H NMR (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data of compounds 4 and 5 in DMSO-d6.
| Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 129.5 | 121.2 | ||
| 2 | 7.60, d (2.0) | 114.8 | 7.49, d (2.0) | 112.0 |
| 3 | 146.0 | 148.4 | ||
| 4 | 153.0 | 153.3 | ||
| 5 | 7.08, d (8.5) | 111.7 | 7.09, d (8.5) | 111.1 |
| 6 | 7.63, dd (2.0, 8.5) | 123.0 | 7.65, dd (2.0, 8.5) | 123.8 |
| 7 | 198.8 | 164.3 | ||
| 8 | 2.97, q (7.0) | 30.7 | ||
| 9 | 1.06, t (7.0) | 8.2 | ||
| 1′ | 4.99, d (7.5) | 100.0 | 5.53, d (8.0) | 94.7 |
| 2′ | 3.26, overlap | 73.1 | 3.29, overlap | 72.4 |
| 3′ | 3.27, overlap | 76.6 | 3.29, overlap | 76.3 |
| 4′ | 3.10, m | 69.8 | 3.11, m | 69.6 |
| 5′ | 3.50, m | 75.5 | 3.44, overlap | 76.2 |
| 6′ | 3.39, dd (7.0, 11.0); | 67.4 | 3.42, overlap; | 67.3 |
| 3.85, dd (1.5, 11.0) | 3.85, overlap | |||
| 1′′ | 4.76, d (3.0) | 109.1 | 4.79, d (3.5) | 109.1 |
| 2′′ | 3.66, d (3.0) | 75.9 | 3.74, d (3.0) | 75.6 |
| 3′′ | 78.8 | 78.7 | ||
| 4′′ | 3.56, d (9.0); | 73.3 | 3.56, d (9.5); | 73.2 |
| 3.82, d (9.0); | 3.83, overlap | |||
| 5′′ | 3.31, overlap | 63.4 | 3.30, overlap | 62.9 |
| 3-OCH3 | 3.82, s | 55.6 | ||
| 4-OCH3 | 3.84, s | 55.8 | 3.84, s | 55.7 |