Literature DB >> 26957983

The comparison of high and standard definition computed tomography techniques regarding coronary artery imaging.

Aktas Aykut1, Degirmenci Bumin1, Yilmaz Omer1, Kayan Mustafa1, Cetin Meltem1, Celik Orhan1, Unlu Nisa1, Orhan Hikmet2, Demirtas Hakan1, Koroglu Mert3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare coronary high-definition CT (HDCT) with standard-definition CT (SDCT) angiography as to radiation dose, image quality and accuracy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 28 patients with history of coronary artery disease scanned by HDCT (Discovery CT750 HD) and SDCT (Somatom Definition AS). The scan modes were both axial prospective ECG-triggered. The vessel diameters and vessel attenuation values of totally 280 measurements from 140 coronary arteries were analyzed by two experienced radiologists. All data was analyzed by intraclass correlation test. Image quality graded by motion and stair step artifacts (grade 1, poor, to grade 4, excellent), accuracy of vessel inner and outer diameters were compared between the two CT units using the independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of measured vessel attenuation values in SDCT between the two radiologists was exceedingly good. The ICC was higher in HDCT. The radiation dose of HDCT was higher than that of SDCT. The mean tube current was 180 (mA) in HDCT and 147(mA) in SDCT with the same tube voltage (kVp). There was no significant difference between image quality.
CONCLUSION: HDCT has a higher radiation dose but has much more atenuation and the spatial resolution which improve measurement accuracy for imaging coronary arteries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Computerised Tomography; Coronary Arteries

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26957983      PMCID: PMC4765469          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v15i3.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  14 in total

1.  Multi-detector row CT angiography of the brain at various kilovoltage settings.

Authors:  Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Roland Bruning; Karin Herrmann; Brad Snyder; Jeffrey D Blume; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fine; Christie B Hopkins; Nicol Ruff; F Carter Newton
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography.

Authors:  Duncan R Coles; Mary A Smail; Ian S Negus; Peter Wilde; Martin Oberhoff; Karl R Karsch; Andreas Baumbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Gilbert L Raff; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; James A Goldstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Dieter Ropers; Johannes Rixe; Katharina Anders; Axel Küttner; Ulrich Baum; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Fabian Moselewski; Ricardo C Cury; Maros Ferencik; Ik-Kyung Jang; Larry J Diaz; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; Patrizia Malagutti; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Rémy Morello; Marco Valgimigli; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.

Authors:  Joanne D Schuijf; Gabija Pundziute; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Joan C Tuinenburg; Barend L van der Hoeven; Albert de Roos; Johannes H C Reiber; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stent imaging: a phantom study.

Authors:  Wen Jie Yang; Ke Min Chen; Li Fang Pang; Ying Guo; Jian Ying Li; Huang Zhang; Zi Lai Pan
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.