Literature DB >> 26957554

Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Melinda L Telli1, Kirsten M Timms2, Julia Reid2, Bryan Hennessy3, Gordon B Mills3, Kristin C Jensen1, Zoltan Szallasi4, William T Barry5, Eric P Winer5, Nadine M Tung6, Steven J Isakoff7, Paula D Ryan8, April Greene-Colozzi9, Alexander Gutin2, Zaina Sangale2, Diana Iliev2, Chris Neff2, Victor Abkevich2, Joshua T Jones2, Jerry S Lanchbury2, Anne-Renee Hartman2, Judy E Garber5, James M Ford1, Daniel P Silver10, Andrea L Richardson11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: BRCA1/2-mutated and some sporadic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have DNA repair defects and are sensitive to DNA-damaging therapeutics. Recently, three independent DNA-based measures of genomic instability were developed on the basis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We assessed a combined homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, an unweighted sum of LOH, TAI, and LST scores, in three neoadjuvant TNBC trials of platinum-containing therapy. We then tested the association of HR deficiency, defined as HRD score ≥42 or BRCA1/2 mutation, with response to platinum-based therapy.
RESULTS: In a trial of neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib, HR deficiency predicted residual cancer burden score of 0 or I (RCB 0/I) and pathologic complete response (pCR; OR = 4.96, P = 0.0036; OR = 6.52, P = 0.0058). HR deficiency remained a significant predictor of RCB 0/I when adjusted for clinical variables (OR = 5.86, P = 0.012). In two other trials of neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy, HR deficiency predicted RCB 0/I and pCR (OR = 10.18, P = 0.0011; OR = 17.00, P = 0.0066). In a multivariable model of RCB 0/I, HR deficiency retained significance when clinical variables were included (OR = 12.08, P = 0.0017). When restricted to BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors, response was higher in patients with high HRD scores: RCB 0/I P = 0.062, pCR P = 0.063 in the neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib trial; RCB 0/I P = 0.0039, pCR P = 0.018 in the neoadjuvant cisplatin trials.
CONCLUSIONS: HR deficiency identifies TNBC tumors, including BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors more likely to respond to platinum-containing therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3764-73. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26957554      PMCID: PMC6773427          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sibylle Loibl; Christoph Salat; Carsten Denkert; Mahdi Rezai; Jens U Blohmer; Christian Jackisch; Stefan Paepke; Bernd Gerber; Dirk M Zahm; Sherko Kümmel; Holger Eidtmann; Peter Klare; Jens Huober; Serban Costa; Hans Tesch; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Fariba Khandan; Peter A Fasching; Bruno V Sinn; Knut Engels; Keyur Mehta; Valentina Nekljudova; Michael Untch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Synergistic chemosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines to poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibition, gemcitabine, and cisplatin.

Authors:  Kedar Hastak; Elizabeth Alli; James M Ford
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Mechanisms of BRCA1 tumor suppression.

Authors:  Daniel P Silver; David M Livingston
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

Authors:  William M Sikov; Donald A Berry; Charles M Perou; Baljit Singh; Constance T Cirrincione; Sara M Tolaney; Charles S Kuzma; Timothy J Pluard; George Somlo; Elisa R Port; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer R Bellon; Deborah Collyar; Olwen M Hahn; Lisa A Carey; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Defective repair of oxidative dna damage in triple-negative breast cancer confers sensitivity to inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alli; Vandana B Sharma; Preethi Sunderesakumar; James M Ford
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Loss of heterozygosity and its correlation with expression profiles in subclasses of invasive breast cancers.

Authors:  Zhigang C Wang; Ming Lin; Lee-Jen Wei; Cheng Li; Alexander Miron; Gabriella Lodeiro; Lyndsay Harris; Sridhar Ramaswamy; David M Tanenbaum; Matthew Meyerson; James D Iglehart; Andrea Richardson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Richardson; Zhigang C Wang; Arcangela De Nicolo; Xin Lu; Myles Brown; Alexander Miron; Xiaodong Liao; J Dirk Iglehart; David M Livingston; Shridar Ganesan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  T Byrski; T Huzarski; R Dent; J Gronwald; D Zuziak; C Cybulski; J Kladny; B Gorski; J Lubinski; S A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs.

Authors:  Andrea M Marquard; Aron C Eklund; Tejal Joshi; Marcin Krzystanek; Francesco Favero; Zhigang C Wang; Andrea L Richardson; Daniel P Silver; Zoltan Szallasi; Nicolai J Birkbak
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2015-05-01
View more
  246 in total

1.  Tumor BRCA1 Reversion Mutation Arising during Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Is Associated with Therapy Resistance.

Authors:  Anosheh Afghahi; Kirsten M Timms; Shaveta Vinayak; Kristin C Jensen; Allison W Kurian; Robert W Carlson; Pei-Jen Chang; Elizabeth Schackmann; Anne-Renee Hartman; James M Ford; Melinda L Telli
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The VEGF receptor neuropilin 2 promotes homologous recombination by stimulating YAP/TAZ-mediated Rad51 expression.

Authors:  Ameer L Elaimy; John J Amante; Lihua Julie Zhu; Mengdie Wang; Charlotte S Walmsley; Thomas J FitzGerald; Hira Lal Goel; Arthur M Mercurio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Biological Subtypes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Hubalek; Theresa Czech; Hannes Müller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Metaplastic Breast Carcinomas.

Authors:  Charlotte K Y Ng; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Felipe C Geyer; Kathleen A Burke; Fresia Pareja; Carey A Eberle; Raymond S Lim; Rachael Natrajan; Nadeem Riaz; Odette Mariani; Larry Norton; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Y Hannah Wen; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Where Do We Stand on the Integration of PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Narjust Duma; Kelly C Gast; Grace M Choong; Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Ciara C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  A Transcriptionally Definable Subgroup of Triple-Negative Breast and Ovarian Cancer Samples Shows Sensitivity to HSP90 Inhibition.

Authors:  Kevin Shee; Jason D Wells; Matthew Ung; Riley A Hampsch; Nicole A Traphagen; Wei Yang; Stephanie C Liu; Megan A Zeldenrust; Liewei Wang; Krishna R Kalari; Jia Yu; Judy C Boughey; Eugene Demidenko; Arminja N Kettenbach; Chao Cheng; Matthew P Goetz; Todd W Miller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Discovery of mutations in homologous recombination genes in African-American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Chun Ding; Aaron W Adamson; Linda Steele; Adam M Bailis; Esther M John; Gail Tomlinson; Susan L Neuhausen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Angel Chao; Chyong-Huey Lai; Tzu-Hao Wang; Shih-Ming Jung; Yun-Shien Lee; Wei-Yang Chang; Lan-Yang Yang; Fei-Chun Ku; Huei-Jean Huang; An-Shine Chao; Chin-Jung Wang; Ting-Chang Chang; Ren-Chin Wu
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Niraparib: A Review in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Young-A Heo; Sean T Duggan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.