Literature DB >> 26956983

Clean intermittent catheterization revisited.

Eliza Lamin1, Diane K Newman2.   

Abstract

Catheterization is the insertion of a hollow flexible tube (called a catheter) to drain the urine from the bladder and is probably one of the oldest urologic procedures, dating back 3000 years. Since 1972, when urologist Dr Jack Lapides described a procedure for performing clean intermittent catheterization, this method of bladder management has become lifesaving for an individual who cannot empty their bladder independently. If the bladder is not emptied regularly, elevated storage pressures can develop which may put the upper tracts at risk of subsequent deterioration. Intermittent catheterization (IC) has become the first-line and preferred method of drainage in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, as long as dexterity or available caregiver support and body habitus allow access. However, over the past 20 years, an evolution has occurred in the technology of catheters used for IC. But with these advances, so has controversy arisen. This article is a review of the current application of IC, the current technology in catheter material and systems, differences between reusable and one-time, or single-use catheters, the cost benefit of doing IC, and the infectious benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clean intermittent catheterization; Hydrophilic catheter; Intermittent catheterization; Intermittent self-catheterization; Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction; Urinary tract infection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956983     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1236-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  43 in total

1.  The physical and antimicrobial effects of microwave heating and alcohol immersion on catheters that are reused for clean intermittent catheterisation.

Authors:  Guy A Bogaert; Lieven Goeman; Dirk de Ridder; Martine Wevers; Jan Ivens; Annette Schuermans
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Clean intermittent self-catheterization in persons with multiple sclerosis: the influence of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  L Vahter; I Zopp; M Kreegipuu; P Kool; T Talvik; K Gross-Paju
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.

Authors:  Darcie Kiddoo; Bonita Sawatzky; Chasta-Dawne Bascu; Nafisa Dharamsi; Kourosh Afshar; Katherine N Moore
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease.

Authors:  J Lapides; A C Diokno; S J Silber; B S Lowe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters.

Authors:  J Stensballe; D Looms; P N Nielsen; M Tvede
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  The importance of osmolality for intermittent catheterization of the urethra.

Authors:  J Lundgren; O Bengtsson; A Israelsson; A C Jönsson; A S Lindh; J Utas
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Adequacy of sanitization and storage of catheters for intermittent use after washing and microwave sterilization.

Authors:  Jennifer L Chan; Timothy E Cooney; Justine M Schober
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Reused silicone catheter for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC): is it safe for spinal cord-injured (SCI) men?

Authors:  A Kovindha; W Na Chiang Mai; H Madersbacher
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-catheters.

Authors:  Binny Pinder; Andrew J Lloyd; Beenish Nafees; Eric P Elkin; Jerome Marley
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Bermingham; Sarah Hodgkinson; Sue Wright; Ellie Hayter; Julian Spinks; Carol Pellowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-08
View more
  9 in total

1.  A systematic review of the content and quality of clinical practice guidelines for management of the neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Peter Bragge; Stacey Guy; Mark Boulet; Eraj Ghafoori; Denise Goodwin; Breanna Wright
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Changes observed in urine microbiology following replacement of long-term urinary catheters: need to modify UTI guidelines in the UK?

Authors:  Deepak Batura; G Gopal Rao; Marion Foran; Fatmata Brempong
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Unexpected foreign body in the bladder of a spinal cord injured patient: A case report.

Authors:  Alper Mengi; Belgin Erhan; Belgin Kara; Ebru Yilmaz Yalcinkaya
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Medical Management of Neurogenic Bladder for Children and Adults: A Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lucas
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

Review 5.  The evidence supporting single-use intermittent catheters in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-09-30

6.  Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

7.  User perception of a new hydrophilic-coated male urinary catheter for intermittent use.

Authors:  Ingrid Koeter; Gro Stensröd; Aud Hunsbedt Nilsen; Rigmor Lund; Colette Haslam; Marianne De Sèze; Rajagopalan Sriram; John Heesakkers
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-09-04

8.  The burden of illness in initiating intermittent catheterization: an analysis of German health care claims data.

Authors:  Almuth Angermund; Gary Inglese; Jimena Goldstine; Laura Iserloh; Berit Libutzki
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi Liao; Yuwei Liu; Shiqi Liang; Ka Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.266

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.