Literature DB >> 15474276

The physical and antimicrobial effects of microwave heating and alcohol immersion on catheters that are reused for clean intermittent catheterisation.

Guy A Bogaert1, Lieven Goeman, Dirk de Ridder, Martine Wevers, Jan Ivens, Annette Schuermans.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Due to worldwide different health insurance policies, patients are often forced to reuse the catheters when performing Clean Intermittent Catheterisation (CIC). We have compared the physical qualities and the antimicrobial effects of two methods of reusing catheters: microwave heating and storage of the catheters in a 70% alcohol solution. The studies were performed during different lengths of time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of catheters (a standard polyvinylchloride catheter, a special polyvinylchloride catheter with flexible Ergothan tip and a prelubrified catheter), normally intended for single use, were submitted to the effect of a microwave oven (Multitech 215 High Grade and Whirlpool M220 750 W and 1000 W with rotating plate) or preservation in a 70% alcohol solution. To study the effects of microwave heating, a recipient of water was placed in the oven to spread the microwaves and to absorb the heat. The catheters were placed in a resealable plastic bag (Ziploc. To study the effects of preservation in a 70% alcohol solution, the catheters were immerged in the solution for different lengths of time. Thereafter were the physical qualities of the catheters evaluated by using the technique of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The antimicrobial effect of the method was evaluated after grafting the catheters with pathogenic E. coli, P. aeruginosa or S. aureus strains.
RESULTS: Microwave heating up to 12 minutes at 750 W caused only minimal changes in the physical qualities of all the catheters. However, there was only an antimicrobial effect of the microwave heating on E. coli and not on P. aeruginosa or S. aureus. If the catheter remained longer than 45 minutes in a 70% alcohol solution, the physical qualities of the catheter changed either minimal in the special polyvinylchloride catheter with flexible Ergothan top but changed significantly in the prelubrified catheter). However, already after 5 minutes of immersion in the 70% alcohol solution there was a complete antimicrobial effect on E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in all catheters.
CONCLUSIONS: It should be recommended to patients on CIC to use a sterile packed and not previously used catheter. In this study we have shown that immersing the catheters in a 70% alcohol solution during 5 minutes can effectively disinfect the catheter without jeopardising the physical qualities. Thereafter, the catheters could be placed in a resealable (e.g. Ziploc bag without being rinsed under water, in order that the few drops of alcohol cause alcohol vapours within the closed plastic bag and maintain the antimicrobial effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474276     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  The good, the bad and the ugly of catheterization practices among elite athletes with spinal cord injury: a global perspective.

Authors:  A Krassioukov; J J Cragg; C West; C Voss; D Krassioukov-Enns
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Clean intermittent catheterization revisited.

Authors:  Eliza Lamin; Diane K Newman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Disability and sustainability: reusable versus single-use catheters for persons with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giulio Del Popolo; Laura Antonucci
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-09-30

Review 4.  Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Shamout; X Biardeau; J Corcos; L Campeau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-03-01

Review 6.  Review of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections and In Vitro Urinary Tract Models.

Authors:  Yvonne J Cortese; Victoria E Wagner; Morgan Tierney; Declan Devine; Andrew Fogarty
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 7.  Recent Updates in Urinary Catheter Products for the Neurogenic Bladder Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Seong Jin Jeong; Seung-June Oh
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-10-28

8.  Clinical Practice Guideline: Nasal Irrigation for Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Adults.

Authors:  Do-Yang Park; Ji Ho Choi; Dong-Kyu Kim; Yong Gi Jung; Sue Jean Mun; Hyun Jin Min; Soo Kyoung Park; Jae-Min Shin; Hyung Chae Yang; Seung-No Hong; Ji-Hun Mo
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Single use versus reusable catheters in intermittent catheterisation for treatment of urinary retention: a protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial (COMPaRE).

Authors:  Tess van Doorn; Sophie A Berendsen; Jeroen R Scheepe; Bertil F M Blok
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.