OBJECTIVES: We examined whether characteristics of local health departments (LHD) and their geographic region were associated with using Facebook and Twitter. We also examined the number of tweets per month for Twitter accounts as an indicator of social media use by LHDs. METHODS: In 2012, we searched for Facebook and Twitter accounts for 2565 LHDs nationwide, and collected adoption date and number of connections for each account. Number of tweets sent indicated LHD use of social media. LHDs were classified as innovators, early adopters, or nonadopters. Characteristics of LHDs were compared across adoption categories, and we examined geographic characteristics, connections, and use. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of LHDs had Facebook, 8% had Twitter, and 7% had both. LHDs serving larger populations were more likely to be innovators, tweeted more often, and had more social media connections. Frequency of tweeting was not associated with adoption category. There were differences in adoption across geographic regions, with western states more likely to be innovators. Innovation was also higher in states where the state health department adopted social media. CONCLUSIONS: Social media has the potential to aid LHDs in disseminating information across the public health system. More evidence is needed to develop best practices for this emerging tool.
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether characteristics of local health departments (LHD) and their geographic region were associated with using Facebook and Twitter. We also examined the number of tweets per month for Twitter accounts as an indicator of social media use by LHDs. METHODS: In 2012, we searched for Facebook and Twitter accounts for 2565 LHDs nationwide, and collected adoption date and number of connections for each account. Number of tweets sent indicated LHD use of social media. LHDs were classified as innovators, early adopters, or nonadopters. Characteristics of LHDs were compared across adoption categories, and we examined geographic characteristics, connections, and use. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of LHDs had Facebook, 8% had Twitter, and 7% had both. LHDs serving larger populations were more likely to be innovators, tweeted more often, and had more social media connections. Frequency of tweeting was not associated with adoption category. There were differences in adoption across geographic regions, with western states more likely to be innovators. Innovation was also higher in states where the state health department adopted social media. CONCLUSIONS: Social media has the potential to aid LHDs in disseminating information across the public health system. More evidence is needed to develop best practices for this emerging tool.
Authors: Michelyn W Bhandari; F Douglas Scutchfield; Richard Charnigo; Martha C Riddell; Glen P Mays Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2010 Mar-Apr
Authors: Stephanie J Stroever; Michael S Mackert; Alfred L McAlister; Deanna M Hoelscher Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Wen-ying Sylvia Chou; Yvonne M Hunt; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lauren Sinnenberg; Alison M Buttenheim; Kevin Padrez; Christina Mancheno; Lyle Ungar; Raina M Merchant Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michael S Deiner; Cherie Fathy; Jessica Kim; Katherine Niemeyer; David Ramirez; Sarah F Ackley; Fengchen Liu; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco Journal: Health Informatics J Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jon-Patrick Allem; Patricia Escobedo; Kar-Hai Chu; Daniel W Soto; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Jenine K Harris; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Rachel G Tabak; Lindsay R Ruhr; Ryan C Maier Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 9.308