Literature DB >> 26953570

Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.

Davood G Gozli1,2, Jay Pratt1, K Zoë Martin1, Alison L Chasteen1.   

Abstract

Concepts with implicit spatial meaning (e.g., "hat", "boots") can bias visual attention in space. This result is typically found in experiments with a single visual target per trial, which can appear at one of two locations (e.g., above vs. below). Furthermore, the interaction is typically found in the form of speeded responses to targets appearing at the compatible location (e.g., faster responses to a target above fixation, after reading "hat"). It has been argued that these concept-space interactions could also result from experimentally-induced associations between the binary set of locations and the conceptual categories with upward and downward meaning. Thus, rather than reflecting a conceptually driven spatial bias, the effect could reflect a benefit for compatible cue-target sequences that occurs only after target onset. We addressed these concerns by going beyond a binary set of locations and employing a search display consisting of four items (above, below, left, and right). Within each search trial, before performing a visual search task, participants performed a conceptual task involving concepts with implicit upward or downward meaning. The search display, in addition to including a target, could also include a salient distractor. Assuming a conceptually driven visual bias, we expected to observe, first, a benefit for target processing at the compatible location and, second, an increase in the cost of the salient distractor. The findings confirmed both predictions, suggesting that concepts do indeed generate a spatial bias. Finally, results from a control experiment, without the conceptual task, suggest the presence of an axis-specific effect, in addition to the location-specific effect, suggesting that concepts might cause both location-specific and axis-specific spatial bias. Taken together, our findings provide additional support for the involvement of spatial processing in conceptual understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26953570      PMCID: PMC4783007          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  49 in total

Review 1.  Words in the brain's language.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments.

Authors:  A Schubö; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2001

3.  Perceiving while acting: action affects perception.

Authors:  Anna Schubö; Wolfgang Prinz; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-07-30

Review 4.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

5.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese; George Lakoff
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

7.  Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing.

Authors:  Martin Lachmair; Carolin Dudschig; Monica De Filippis; Irmgard de la Vega; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

8.  From top to bottom: spatial shifts of attention caused by linguistic stimuli.

Authors:  Carolin Dudschig; Martin Lachmair; Irmgard de la Vega; Monica De Filippis; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

9.  The highs and lows of the interaction between word meaning and space.

Authors:  Therese Thornton; Tobias Loetscher; Mark J Yates; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Stormy Seas and Cloudy Skies: Conceptual Processing is (Still) Linguistic and Perceptual.

Authors:  Max Louwerse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.