R K Jain1, T J Vokes2. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Ave AMB M267-MC1027, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. rajesh.jain@uchospitals.edu. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Ave AMB M267-MC1027, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Abstract
Trabecular bone score, an indirect measure of bone structure, may differ between ethnicities. We found that African Americans had lower trabecular bone score than do whites referred for densitometry, even when controlling for age and abdominal soft tissue thickness. PURPOSE: Trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measure of bone structure, has been shown to predict fractures in predominantly white populations. Analysis of NHANES data revealed lower TBS in African Americans than in whites. However, it is not clear if this is true in patients referred for densitometry (where fracture risk stratification is most pertinent) or if ethnic differences in TBS may be related to differences in abdominal soft tissue (tissue thickness), which was not controlled for in the NHANES study. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all BMD scans obtained at a university hospital in Chicago between 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: There were 3187 women (51 % African American) and 675 men (32 % African American). African American women were older (69.6 ± 10.4 vs. 64.8 ± 1.3) and heavier (BMI 28.3 ± 4.7 vs. 25.4 ± 4.5) than whites were, while men were of similar age and BMI. African American women had higher T-scores at all sites (the lowest of T-scores, termed LowT, -1.5 ± 1.2 vs. -1.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) but lower TBS than white women even when adjusting for age and tissue thickness (1.231 ± 0.130 versus 1.251 ± 0.130, p < 0.001). While LowT was higher in African American men (-1.1 ± 1.2 vs. -1.5 ± 1.4, p < 0.001), TBS was lower than in white men even after adjusting for age and tissue thickness (1.232 ± 0.144 vs. 1.275 ± 0.144, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans had lower TBS than whites did, even with adjustment for age and tissue thickness. Ethnic differences in TBS should be considered when assessing fracture risk in clinical practice.
Trabecular bone score, an indirect measure of bone structure, may differ between ethnicities. We found that African Americans had lower trabecular bone score than do whites referred for densitometry, even when controlling for age and abdominal soft tissue thickness. PURPOSE: Trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measure of bone structure, has been shown to predict fractures in predominantly white populations. Analysis of NHANES data revealed lower TBS in African Americans than in whites. However, it is not clear if this is true in patients referred for densitometry (where fracture risk stratification is most pertinent) or if ethnic differences in TBS may be related to differences in abdominal soft tissue (tissue thickness), which was not controlled for in the NHANES study. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all BMD scans obtained at a university hospital in Chicago between 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: There were 3187 women (51 % African American) and 675 men (32 % African American). African American women were older (69.6 ± 10.4 vs. 64.8 ± 1.3) and heavier (BMI 28.3 ± 4.7 vs. 25.4 ± 4.5) than whites were, while men were of similar age and BMI. African American women had higher T-scores at all sites (the lowest of T-scores, termed LowT, -1.5 ± 1.2 vs. -1.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) but lower TBS than white women even when adjusting for age and tissue thickness (1.231 ± 0.130 versus 1.251 ± 0.130, p < 0.001). While LowT was higher in African American men (-1.1 ± 1.2 vs. -1.5 ± 1.4, p < 0.001), TBS was lower than in white men even after adjusting for age and tissue thickness (1.232 ± 0.144 vs. 1.275 ± 0.144, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans had lower TBS than whites did, even with adjustment for age and tissue thickness. Ethnic differences in TBS should be considered when assessing fracture risk in clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
African Americans; Ethnicity; Osteoporosis; Trabecular bone score
Authors: M Parisien; F Cosman; D Morgan; M Schnitzer; X Liang; J Nieves; L Forese; M Luckey; D Meier; V Shen; R Lindsay; D W Dempster Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Li-Yung Lui; Kristine E Ensrud; Joseph M Zmuda; Katie L Stone; Marc C Hochberg; Steven R Cummings Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-05-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Barbara Campolina Silva; Stephanie Boutroy; Chiyuan Zhang; Donald Jay McMahon; Bin Zhou; Ji Wang; Julia Udesky; Serge Cremers; Marta Sarquis; Xiang-Dong Edward Guo; Didier Hans; John Paul Bilezikian Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Lisa Palermo; Molly Vogt; Kristine E Ensrud; Susan Ewing; Marc Hochberg; Michael C Nevitt; Dennis M Black Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Barbara C Silva; Marcella D Walker; Alice Abraham; Stephanie Boutroy; Chiyuan Zhang; Donald J McMahon; George Liu; Didier Hans; John P Bilezikian Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Melissa S Putman; Elaine W Yu; Hang Lee; Robert M Neer; Elizabeth Schindler; Alexander P Taylor; Emily Cheston; Mary L Bouxsein; Joel S Finkelstein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: A L Goldman; C M Donlon; N R Cook; J E Manson; J E Buring; T Copeland; C Y Yu; M S LeBoff Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Arun S Karlamangla; Kristine Ruppert; Yinjuan Lian; MeiHua Huang; Sioban Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Gail A Greendale Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 2.879