| Literature DB >> 26951917 |
Sei Won Kim1, Jong Min Lee1, Woo Ho Ban1, Chan Kwon Park1, Hyoung Kyu Yoon1, Sang Haak Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The smoking rates and patterns in the North Korean population are not well known. More than 20,000 North Korean defectors have settled in South Korea; thus, we can estimate the current North Korean smoking situation using this group.Entities:
Keywords: North Korean defectors; Smoking; Smoking cessation; Tobacco use disorder
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26951917 PMCID: PMC4939500 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2015.114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Intern Med ISSN: 1226-3303 Impact factor: 2.884
Demographic characteristics of the North Korean male defectors (n = 272)
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Age, yr | 35.9 ± 11.3 |
| Age of smoking initiation, yr | 18.2 ± 4.7 |
| Smoking history | |
| Current smokers | 229 (84.2) |
| Ex-smokers | 34 (12.5) |
| Non-smokers | 9 (3.3) |
| Smoking amount | |
| Packs per day | 0.7 ± 0.4 |
| Years of smoking | 17.0 ± 10.7 |
| Pack-years | 12.3 ± 11.6 |
| Family members who smoked | 203/260 (78.1) |
| Smoking cessation | |
| Intention to quit smoking in current smokers | 149/221 (67.4) |
| Previous attempt in current and ex-smokers | 180/255 (70.6) |
| Success rate | 34/180 (18.9) |
| FTND score[ | 3.26 ± 2.24 |
| KTSND score[ | 13.32 ± 4.95 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%).
FTND, Fagerström test for nicotine dependence; KTSND, Kano test for social nicotine dependence.
FTND was measured in current and ex-smokers (n = 193).
KTSND was measured in current, ex- and non-smokers (n = 255).
Fagerström test between current smokers and ex-smokers
| Item | Current smokers (n = 172) | Ex-smokers (n = 21) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1. How soon after you wake up do you smoke your first cigarette? | 1.46 ± 1.08 | 1.05 ± 1.12 | 0.103 |
| Q2. Do you find it difficult to refrain from smoking in places where it is forbidden, e.g., in a church, at a library, in cinema, etc.? | 0.27 ± 0.45 | 0.14 ± 0.36 | 0.138 |
| Q3. Which cigarette would you hate most to give up? | 0.54 ± 0.50 | 0.48 ± 0.51 | 0.578 |
| Q4. How many cigarettes/day do you smoke? | 0.49 ± 0.70 | 0.52 ± 0.81 | 0.829 |
| Q5. Do you smoke more frequently during the first hours after waking than during the rest of the day? | 0.15 ± 0.36 | 0.14 ± 0.36 | 0.920 |
| Q6. Do you smoke when you are so ill that you are in bed most of the day? | 0.44 ± 0.50 | 0.24 ± 0.44 | 0.064 |
| FTND score | 3.35 ± 2.26 | 2.57 ± 1.99 | 0.133 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
FTND, Fagerström test for nicotine dependence.
Comparison between current smokers and ex-smokers was done by t test.
Kano test for social nicotine dependence between current, ex-, and non-smokers
| Item | Current smokers (n = 213) | Ex-smokers (n = 33) | Non-smokers (n = 9) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1. Smoking itself is a disease | 1.19 ± 1.07 | 1.18 ± 1.10 | 0.67 ± 0.71 | 0.353 |
| Q2. Smoking is a part of culture | 1.11 ± 0.97 | 0.85 ± 0.94 | 0.89 ± 0.78 | 0.289 |
| Q3. Tobacco is one of life’s pleasures | 1.48 ± 0.94 | 1.36 ± 1.14 | 1.11 ± 1.05 | 0.446 |
| Q4. Smokers’ lifestyles may be respected | 1.01 ± 0.94 | 0.64 ± 0.78 | 0.44 ± 0.73 | 0.023[ |
| Q5. Smoking sometimes enriches people’s life | 0.89 ± 0.86 | 0.61 ± 0.83 | 0.44 ± 0.73 | 0.082 |
| Q6. Tobacco has positive physical or mental effects | 1.04 ± 1.20 | 0.85 ± 0.97 | 0.33 ± 0.71 | 0.149 |
| Q7. Tobacco has effects to relieve stress | 1.92 ± 0.79 | 1.48 ± 0.97 | 0.89 ± 1.05 | < 0.001[ |
| Q8. Tobacco enhances the function of smokers’ brains | 0.65 ± 0.84 | 0.48 ± 0.67 | 0.56 ± 1.01 | 0.554 |
| Q9. Doctors exaggerate the ill effects of smoking | 2.10 ± 0.99 | 2.12 ± 0.99 | 1.22 ± 1.30 | 0.037[ |
| Q10. People can smoke at places where ashtrays are available | 2.36 ± 0.74 | 2.27 ± 0.88 | 1.78 ± 0.97 | 0.075 |
| KTSND score | 13.76 ± 4.87 | 11.85 ± 4.74 | 8.33 ± 4.21 | 0.001[ |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
KTSND, Kano test for social nicotine dependence.
Comparison between three groups was done by analysis of variance test and Bonferroni’s correction was applied to the post hoc analysis.
No significant difference was seen in post hoc analysis.
Current smokers showed significantly higher value compared with ex- and non-smokers.
Current smokers showed significantly higher value compared with non-smokers.
Figure 1.Mean comparison between the questions of Kano test. Significantly higher values were seen for Q7, Q9, and Q10 compared with the other questions, both in total subjects and in current smokers in (A) total subjects, (B) current smokers, (C) ex-smokers, and (D) non-smokers. The Q9 and Q10 values were also significantly higher than those for the other questions among ex-smokers. However, not all questions showed significant differences in non-smokers. ap < 0.05 compared with other questions (Q1 to 6 and Q8) by analysis of variance test and Bonferroni’s correction.
Fagerström test and Kano test for social nicotine dependence with other characteristics
| Characteristic | FTND | KTSND | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Family member who smoke | 0.676 | 0.652 | ||
| Yes | 3.34 ± 2.09 | 13.39 ± 4.71 | ||
| No | 3.16 ± 2.70 | 13.06 ± 5.19 | ||
| Intention to quit smoking | 0.014 | 0.014 | ||
| Yes | 2.94 ± 2.04 | 13.00 ± 4.53 | ||
| No | 3.85 ± 2.41 | 14.72 ± 5.32 | ||
| Previous attempt of smoking cessation | 0.027 | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 3.05 ± 2.15 | 12.72 ± 4.68 | ||
| No | 3.85 ± 2.38 | 15.16 ± 4.97 | ||
FTND, Fagerström test for nicotine dependence; KTSND, Kano test for social nicotine dependence.
Comparison was done by t test.
Correlation coefficient of the scales and other parameters
| Parameter | KTSND | Smoking amount/day | Smoking years | Current age | Starting age of smoking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTND | 0.110 | 0.601[ | 0.122 | 0.040 | –0.214[ |
| KTSND | - | 0.139[ | 0.174[ | 0.111 | –0.135[ |
| Smoking amount/day | - | - | 0.167[ | 0.115 | –0.159[ |
| Smoking years | - | - | - | 0.866[ | 0.030 |
| Current age | - | - | - | - | 0.348[ |
KTSND, Kano test for social nicotine dependence; FTND, Fagerström test for nicotine dependence.
p < 0.01,
p < 0.05,
by Spearman correlation analysis.