Literature DB >> 26951311

Surgical Proficiency Gain and Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Sheraz R Markar1, Hugh Mackenzie1, Pernilla Lagergren1, George B Hanna1, Jesper Lagergren2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify the presence and length of esophagectomy proficiency gain curves in terms of short- and long-term mortality for esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 1987 and 2010 with follow-up until 2014 were identified from a well-established, population-based, nationwide Swedish cohort study. Proficiency gain curves were created by using risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis for 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year all-cause and disease-specific mortality measures. Similarly, the proficiency gain curves for lymph node harvest, resection margin status, and reoperation incidence were assessed as performance-contributing factors to the observed changes in long-term survival.
RESULTS: Esophagectomies in 1,821 patients with esophageal cancer were conducted by 139 surgeons. The change-point in proficiency gain curve for all-cause 30-day mortality was early, at 15 cases, when mortality decreased from 7.9% to 3.1% (P < .001). Later change-points, which ranged from 35 to 59 cases, were observed for 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality rates, for which all-cause mortality decreased from 34.9% to 27.7% (P = .011), from 47.4% to 41.5% (P = .049), and from 31.4% to 19.1% (P = .009), respectively. Similar change-points were observed in disease-specific mortality at 1 and 3 years. There was a continuous increase in lymph node harvest, which did not plateau. Also, change-points were observed for resection margin with tumor involvement at 17 cases, with a reduction from 20.9% to 15.2% (P = .004), and for reoperation rate at 55 cases, with a reduction from 12.6% to 5.0% (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The gain of proficiency in esophagectomy for cancer is associated with measurable changes in short- and long-term mortality results. These findings indicate a need for structured national training and mentorship programs for esophageal cancer surgery.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26951311     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  Surgeon proficiency and outcomes in esophagectomy: a perspective and comment on an analysis of the Swedish Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Fred Lee; Inderpal S Sarkaria; James D Luketich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Minimising patient harm whilst gaining surgical proficiency.

Authors:  Sheraz Markar; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hartwig Bauer; Kim C Honselmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 4.  [Differentiated surgical approach for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction].

Authors:  W Schröder; R Lambertz; R van Hillegesberger; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Andrea Sozzi; Gianluca Bonitta; Francesca Lombardo; Marta Cavalli; Silvia Cirri; Giampiero Campanelli; Piergiorgio Danelli; Davide Bona
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Ian Fukudome; Kotaro Yamashita; Masami Yuda; Masaru Hayami; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.230

7.  Securing enteral nutrition with routine feeding jejunostomy after esophagectomy: lost effort or a life saver?

Authors:  Olli Helminen; Johanna Mrena; Eero Sihvo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Benchmark values for transthoracic esophagectomy are not set as the defined "best possible"-a validation study.

Authors:  Olli Helminen; Johanna Mrena; Eero Sihvo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smyth; Jesper Lagergren; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Florian Lordick; Manish A Shah; Pernilla Lagergren; David Cunningham
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Neoadjuvant therapy in relation to lymphadenectomy and resection margins during surgery for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joonas H Kauppila; Karl Wahlin; Pernilla Lagergren; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.