Literature DB >> 26948175

Effect of Patellar Resurfacing on Patellofemoral Crepitus in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Hiroyasu Ogawa1, Kazu Matsumoto1, Haruhiko Akiyama1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral crepitus (PC) is a complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although patellar resurfacing (PR) directly influences the kinematics of the patellofemoral joint, the influence of PR on PC is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of PR on the incidence of PC.
METHODS: This study included 84 knees from 69 patients who underwent TKA using the Vanguard Complete Total Knee System, with or without PR (n = 42 each). Clinical evaluation of the incidence of PC; Knee Society Score; and radiographic measurements of patellar tilt, patellar distance, patellar shift, Insall-Salvati ratio, patellar flexion, femorotibial angle; and rotation of the femoral component was performed. Parameters were evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative months 2, 6, 12, and 24. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of PR on the risk of PC.
RESULTS: The incidence of PC was significantly higher in the non-PR group than the PR group (33.3% vs 4.8%). The knees of the PR group displayed a significantly increased patellar tilt, medially shifted patella, and decreased patella flexion angle compared with those of the non-PR group. There were no significant differences in the other radiographic parameters or Knee Society Score. The absence of PR was associated with a much higher risk of PC (odds ratio, 10.37; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-10.37).
CONCLUSION: PR may decrease the incidence of PC by increasing the patellar tilt and medial shift and positioning the patella more closely parallel to the femur. PR is recommended during TKA with this prosthesis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patellar resurfacing; patellar shift; patellar tilt; patellofemoral crepitus; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948175     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes after TKA using two prostheses with different patellofemoral design features.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Jong Hun Baek; Kyung Tack Yoon; Hyuck Sung Son; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison between Patellar Resurfacing and Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty Regarding the Postoperative Satisfaction of Patients and Patellar Crepitus.

Authors:  Mohammad H Kaseb; Javad Mortazavi; Mohammad Ayati Firoozabadi; Hesam Toofan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiaoyu Dai; Lidong Li; Zhigang Chen; Haidong Cui; Shujun Lv
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Rare primary patellar resurfacing does not lead to more secondary patellar resurfacing: analysis of 70,014 primary total knee arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).

Authors:  Bart J Robben; Astrid J De Vries; Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren; Rob G H H Nelissen; Reinoud W Brouwer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Comparison of Patellofemoral-Specific Clinical and Radiographic Results after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Patellofemoral Design-Modified Prosthesis and Its Predecessor.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Uk Suh; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.