A García-Hermoso1, A J Cerrillo-Urbina2, T Herrera-Valenzuela1, C Cristi-Montero3, J M Saavedra4, V Martínez-Vizcaíno2. 1. Laboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Santiago, Chile. 2. Social and Health Care Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain. 3. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. 4. Physical Activity, Physical Education, Sport and Health Research Centre, Sports Science Department, School of Science and Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The scientific interest in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has greatly increased during recent years. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of HIIT interventions on cardio-metabolic risk factors and aerobic capacity in overweight and obese youth, in comparison with other forms of exercise. DATA SOURCES: A computerized search was made using seven databases. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The analysis was restricted to studies that examined the effect of HIIT interventions on cardio-metabolic and/or aerobic capacity in pediatric obesity (6-17 years old). PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Nine studies using HIIT interventions were selected (n = 274). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Standarized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The DerSimonian-Laird approach was used. RESULTS: HIIT interventions (4-12 week duration) produced larger decreases in systolic blood pressure (SMD = 0.39; -3.63 mmHg) and greater increases in maximum oxygen uptake (SMD = 0.59; 1.92 ml/kg/min) than other forms of exercise. Also, type of comparison exercise group and duration of study were moderators. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT could be considered a more effective and time-efficient intervention for improving blood pressure and aerobic capacity levels in obese youth in comparison to other types of exercise.
BACKGROUND: The scientific interest in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has greatly increased during recent years. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of HIIT interventions on cardio-metabolic risk factors and aerobic capacity in overweight and obese youth, in comparison with other forms of exercise. DATA SOURCES: A computerized search was made using seven databases. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The analysis was restricted to studies that examined the effect of HIIT interventions on cardio-metabolic and/or aerobic capacity in pediatric obesity (6-17 years old). PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Nine studies using HIIT interventions were selected (n = 274). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Standarized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The DerSimonian-Laird approach was used. RESULTS: HIIT interventions (4-12 week duration) produced larger decreases in systolic blood pressure (SMD = 0.39; -3.63 mmHg) and greater increases in maximum oxygen uptake (SMD = 0.59; 1.92 ml/kg/min) than other forms of exercise. Also, type of comparison exercise group and duration of study were moderators. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT could be considered a more effective and time-efficient intervention for improving blood pressure and aerobic capacity levels in obese youth in comparison to other types of exercise.
Authors: C Álvarez; R Ramírez-Campillo; R Ramírez-Vélez; C Martínez; M Castro-Sepúlveda; A Alonso-Martínez; M Izquierdo Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Ricardo Borges Viana; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; João Pedro Araújo Naves; Victor Silveira Coswig; Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Carlos Alexandre Vieira; Paulo Gentil Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Pedro Delgado-Floody; Miguel Espinoza-Silva; Felipe García-Pinillos; Pedro Latorre-Román Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Muhammed Mustafa Atakan; Yanchun Li; Şükran Nazan Koşar; Hüseyin Hüsrev Turnagöl; Xu Yan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.390