| Literature DB >> 26944843 |
Christopher J Graves1, Elizabeth J Makrides2, Victor T Schmidt1,3, Anne E Giblin4, Zoe G Cardon4, David M Rand5.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Environmental nutrient enrichment from human agricultural and waste runoff could cause changes to microbial communities that allow them to capitalize on newly available resources. Currently, the response of microbial communities to nutrient enrichment remains poorly understood, and, while some studies have shown no clear changes in community composition in response to heavy nutrient loading, others targeting specific genes have demonstrated clear impacts. In this study, we compared functional metagenomic profiles from sediment samples taken along two salt marsh creeks, one of which was exposed for more than 40 years to treated sewage effluent at its head. We identified strong and consistent increases in the relative abundance of microbial genes related to each of the biochemical steps in the denitrification pathway at enriched sites. Despite fine-scale local increases in the abundance of denitrification-related genes, the overall community structures based on broadly defined functional groups and taxonomic annotations were similar and varied with other environmental factors, such as salinity, which were common to both creeks. Homology-based taxonomic assignments of nitrous oxide reductase sequences in our data show that increases are spread over a broad taxonomic range, thus limiting detection from taxonomic data alone. Together, these results illustrate a functionally targeted yet taxonomically broad response of microbial communities to anthropogenic nutrient loading, indicating some resolution to the apparently conflicting results of existing studies on the impacts of nutrient loading in sediment communities. IMPORTANCE: In this study, we used environmental metagenomics to assess the response of microbial communities in estuarine sediments to long-term, nutrient-rich sewage effluent exposure. Unlike previous studies, which have mainly characterized communities based on taxonomic data or primer-based amplification of specific target genes, our whole-genome metagenomics approach allowed an unbiased assessment of the abundance of denitrification-related genes across the entire community. We identified strong and consistent increases in the relative abundance of gene sequences related to denitrification pathways across a broad phylogenetic range at sites exposed to long-term nutrient addition. While further work is needed to determine the consequences of these community responses in regulating environmental nutrient cycles, the increased abundance of bacteria harboring denitrification genes suggests that such processes may be locally upregulated. In addition, our results illustrate how whole-genome metagenomics combined with targeted hypothesis testing can reveal fine-scale responses of microbial communities to environmental disturbance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26944843 PMCID: PMC4836423 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03990-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
FIG 1Physical characteristics of water and sediment from the reference and enriched creeks. A single water sample was collected at each site (A and B), while three sediment samples were collected per site (C). (A) Similar gradients between the two creeks from sites 1 through 5 in aspects unrelated to sewage outfall. (B) The sewage outfall is associated with significant nutrient enrichment, with orders-of-magnitude greater concentrations of nitrate/nitrite, phosphorus, and ammonia in water at all sites along the gradient. (C) Concentration of total carbon and nitrogen content in creek sediment are significantly higher in the enriched creek than in the reference creek (P < 0.01).
FIG 2Principal-component analysis of genus-level taxonomic annotations (A) and subsystems-level functional annotations (B) between each site and creek.
Annotation subgroups, defining search criteria of subgroups, total number of annotations found in each group, and P values from permutational analysis of variance tests for each annotation subgroup
| Annotation subgroup | Search criteria | No. of annotations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creek effect | % C effect | Creek × % C interaction effect | |||
| Respiratory nitrate reductase | “respiratory” AND “nitrate reductase” | 87 | 0.3348 | ||
| Assimilatory nitrate reductase | “assimilatory” AND “nitrate reductase” | 32 | 0.1677 | ||
| Periplasmic nitrate reductase | “periplasmic” AND “nitrate reductase” | 62 | 0.2235 | 0.1746 | |
| Dissimilatory nitrite reductase | “dissimilatory” AND “nitrite reductase” | 7 | 0.2893 | 0.8480 | |
| Cytochrome | “cytochrome cd1” AND “nitrite reductase” | 10 | 0.0710 | 0.7731 | |
| Cytochrome | “cyctochrome c” AND “nitrite reductase” | 18 | 0.2551 | 0.2249 | |
| Assimilatory nitrite reductase | “assimilatory” AND “nitrate reductase” | 32 | 0.1173 | 0.1289 | |
| Nitric oxide reductase | “nitric oxide reductase” | 128 | 0.1510 | ||
| Nitrous oxide reductase | “nitrous oxide reductase” OR “ | 102 | 0.5109 | ||
% C, % carbon. Significant results after Bonferroni correction are indicated in bold.
FIG 3Plots showing the frequency of annotations corresponding to enzymes associated with various steps in the denitrification pathway. Each panel represents the abundance of annotations corresponding to a given enzyme across all 5 sites in both the enriched and reference creeks. Multiple points at each site represent replicate samples.
FIG 4Bootstrapped neighbor-joining phylogeny of 158 nosZ sequence clusters from our original 240-reference NCBI-based database, representing 80 distinct bacterial and 3 archaeal genera. Clusters of >93% similarities were formed to reduce the total spread of the tree using UCLUST (47). Sequences in this tree had at least 1 hit from our creek sediment metagenomic data with an alignment bit score greater than 80. The number of hits from enriched and reference creeks to each cluster is shown by the length of the bar at the terminal node of each branch. Branches are colored by typical (gray) versus atypical (violet) genera according to categorization of atypical and typical genera by Sanford et al. in 2012 (17).