Literature DB >> 26944575

Effect of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Method on Patellofemoral Contact Pressures and Kinematics.

Joanna M Stephen1, Christoph Kittl1, Andy Williams2, Stefano Zaffagnini3, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli3, Christian Fink4, Andrew A Amis5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There remains a lack of evidence regarding the optimal method when reconstructing the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and whether some graft constructs can be more forgiving to surgical errors, such as overtensioning or tunnel malpositioning, than others. HYPOTHESIS: The null hypothesis was that there would not be a significant difference between reconstruction methods (eg, graft type and fixation) in the adverse biomechanical effects (eg, patellar maltracking or elevated articular contact pressure) resulting from surgical errors such as tunnel malpositioning or graft overtensioning. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were placed on a customized testing rig, where the femur was fixed but the tibia could be moved freely from 0° to 90° of flexion. Individual quadriceps heads and the iliotibial tract were separated and loaded to 205 N of tension using a weighted pulley system. Patellofemoral contact pressures and patellar tracking were measured at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion using pressure-sensitive film inserted between the patella and trochlea, in conjunction with an optical tracking system. The MPFL was transected and then reconstructed in a randomized order using a (1) double-strand gracilis tendon, (2) quadriceps tendon, and (3) tensor fasciae latae allograft. Pressure maps and tracking measurements were recorded for each reconstruction method in 2 N and 10 N of tension and with the graft positioned in the anatomic, proximal, and distal femoral tunnel positions. Statistical analysis was undertaken using repeated-measures analyses of variance, Bonferroni post hoc analyses, and paired t tests.
RESULTS: Anatomically placed grafts during MPFL reconstruction tensioned to 2 N resulted in the restoration of intact medial joint contact pressures and patellar tracking for all 3 graft types investigated (P > .050). However, femoral tunnels positioned proximal or distal to the anatomic origin resulted in significant increases in the mean medial joint contact pressure, medial patellar tilt, and medial patellar translation during knee flexion or extension, respectively (P < .050), regardless of graft type, as did tensioning to 10 N.
CONCLUSION: The importance of the surgical technique, specifically correct femoral tunnel positioning and graft tensioning, in restoring normal patellofemoral joint (PFJ) kinematics and articular cartilage contact stresses is evident, and the type of MPFL graft appeared less important. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The correct femoral tunnel position and graft tension for restoring normal PFJ kinematics and articular cartilage contact stresses appear to be more important than graft selection during MPFL reconstruction. These findings emphasize the importance of the surgical technique when undertaking this procedure.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  contact pressures; gracilis; graft; medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction; patellar instability; patellofemoral tracking; quadriceps tendon; surgery; tensor fasciae latae

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26944575     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516631736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  29 in total

1.  Repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament with suture tape augmentation leads to similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics like reconstruction with a tendon graft: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Julian Mehl; Alexander Otto; Brendan Comer; Cameron Kia; Franz Liska; Elifho Obopilwe; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff; John P Fulkerson; Florian B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Length change patterns and shape of a grafted tendon after anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction differs from that in a healthy knee.

Authors:  Shuji Nakagawa; Yuji Arai; Hiroaki Inoue; Manabu Hino; Yuta Fujii; Shintaro Komaki; Kazuya Ikoma; Keiichiro Ueshima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Allowing one quadrant of patellar lateral translation during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction successfully limits maltracking without overconstraining the patella.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; Molly K Lalonde; Joseph N Gabra; S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Tuberosity Medialization and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  John J Elias; Bradley W Smith; Blake T Daney
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Revision surgery for failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in better disease-specific outcome scores when performed for recurrent instability than for patellofemoral pain or limited range of motion.

Authors:  Felix Zimmermann; Danko D Milinkovic; Juliane Börtlein; Peter Balcarek
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Derotational distal femoral osteotomy yields satisfactory clinical outcomes in pathological femoral rotation with failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yanwei Cao; Zhijun Zhang; Jiewei Shen; Guanyang Song; Qiankun Ni; Yue Li; Tong Zheng; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Tibial tuberosity anteriomedialization vs. medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for treatment of patellar instability related to malalignment: Computational simulation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Miho J Tanaka; Kerwyn C Jones; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Dual Patella Docking Technique.

Authors:  Hassan Azimi; Oke Anakwenze
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-11-06

9.  Weight bearing versus conventional CT for the measurement of patellar alignment and stability in patients after surgical treatment for patellar recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Giada Lullini; Claudio Belvedere; Maurizio Busacca; Antonio Moio; Alberto Leardini; Silvio Caravelli; Bruna Maccaferri; Stefano Durante; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Factors Influencing Graft Function following MPFL Reconstruction: A Dynamic Simulation Study.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Andrew J Cosgarea; Jared M Forman; John J Elias
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.