Literature DB >> 34596695

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy yields satisfactory clinical outcomes in pathological femoral rotation with failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Yanwei Cao1, Zhijun Zhang1, Jiewei Shen1, Guanyang Song1, Qiankun Ni1, Yue Li1, Tong Zheng1, Hui Zhang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of de-rotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) in patients who underwent primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) failure with increased femoral anteversion along with high-grade J sign.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2019, 14 patients underwent DDFO revision surgery due to failed MPFLR. The pre- and postoperative J sign grade, Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, femoral anteversion angle (FAA), patellar lateral tilt angle (PLTA), MPFL graft laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores) were collected. The anterior-posterior and proximal-distal distances between the actual point and the Schöttle point were also calculated.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent MPFLR revision by DDFO combined with MPFLR. The mean PLTA improved from 40.7° ± 11.9° to 20.5° ± 8.7° (P < 0.001). The mean FAA significantly decreased from 42.7° ± 12.0° to 14.1° ± 5.2° (P < 0.001). The mean patellar laxity index (PLI) decreased from 82.4% preoperatively to 15.1% postoperatively (P < 0.001). None of these patients experienced subluxation or re-dislocation during follow-up of 29.7 ± 5.0 months after revision surgery. Meanwhile, the Tegner score at the last follow-up ranged from 3 to 6, with a median of 5. The Kujala, Lysholm, and IKDC subjective scores showed significant improvements, from a mean of 51.0 ± 6.8 preoperatively to 75.4 ± 5.1 postoperatively (P < 0.001), 49.2 ± 7.9 to 75.2 ± 7.2 (P < 0.001), and 42.9 ± 6.2 to 76.8 ± 6.0 (P < 0.001), respectively. The proportion of patients with a high-grade J sign was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (100% vs. 14%). Four out of 14 patients (29%) showed femoral tunnel mal-positioning.
CONCLUSION: MPFLR revision by DDFO combined with MPFLR achieved favorable clinical outcomes in patients with increased femoral anteversion along with high-grade J sign. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
© 2021. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  De-rotational distal femoral osteotomy; Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction; Recurrent patellar dislocation; Revision

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34596695     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06739-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  43 in total

1.  Torsional osteotomies of the femur.

Authors:  Jörg Dickschas; Jörg Harrer; Benoit Reuter; Judith Schwitulla; Wolf Strecker
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Single-tunnel and double-tunnel medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions have similar clinical, radiological and functional results.

Authors:  Niyazi Ercan; Ramazan Akmese; Burak Ulusoy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reconstruction of the medial patellotibial ligament results in favorable clinical outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charles A Baumann; Eli L Pratte; Seth L Sherman; Elizabeth A Arendt; Betina B Hinckel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical outcomes after revision surgery for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Chatterton; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Ole Gade Sørensen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study.

Authors:  H Dejour; G Walch; L Nove-Josserand; C Guier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distances are not equivalent in patients with patellar instability.

Authors:  Christopher L Camp; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych; Bruce A Levy; Jeffrey R Bond; Mark S Collins; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction significantly improved quality of life in patients with recurrent patella dislocation.

Authors:  Theodoros Bouras; Edmond U; Ashley Brown; Peter Gallacher; Andrew Barnett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in patients with recurrent patella instability.

Authors:  Ditte Enderlein; Torsten Nielsen; Svend Erik Christiansen; Peter Faunø; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of rotational alignment in patients with patellar dislocations.

Authors:  Gerd Diederichs; Torsten Köhlitz; Evgenios Kornaropoulos; Markus O Heller; Bernd Vollnberg; Sven Scheffler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Inconsistencies in Reporting Risk Factors for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  William M Cregar; Hailey P Huddleston; Stephanie E Wong; Jack Farr; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

1.  Restricted kinematic alignment may be associated with increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior-stabilized TKA: a case-control study.

Authors:  Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Jobe Shatrov; Cécile Batailler; Axel Schmidt; Elvire Servien; Emmanuel Marchetti; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.114

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.