Literature DB >> 32143217

Factors Influencing Graft Function following MPFL Reconstruction: A Dynamic Simulation Study.

Miho J Tanaka1, Andrew J Cosgarea2, Jared M Forman2, John J Elias3.   

Abstract

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is currently the primary surgical procedure for treating recurrent lateral patellar instability. The understanding of graft function has largely been based on studies performed with normal knees. The current study was performed to characterize graft function following MPFL reconstruction, focusing on the influence of pathologic anatomy on graft tension, variations with knee flexion, and the influence on patellar tracking. Knee squatting was simulated with 15 multibody dynamic simulation models representing knees being treated for recurrent lateral patellar instability. Squatting was simulated in a preoperative condition and following MPFL reconstruction with a hamstrings tendon graft set to allow 0.5 quadrants of lateral patellar translation with the knee at 30 degrees of flexion. Linear regressions were performed to relate maximum tension in the graft to parameters of knee anatomy. Repeated measures comparisons evaluated variations in patellar tracking at 5-degree increments of knee flexion. Maximum graft tension was significantly correlated with a parameter characterizing lateral position of the tibial tuberosity (maximum lateral tibial tuberosity to posterior cruciate ligament attachment distance, r 2 = 0.73, p < 0.001). No significant correlations were identified for parameters related to trochlear dysplasia (lateral trochlear inclination) or patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index and patellotrochlear index). Graft tension peaked at low flexion angles and was minimal by 30 degrees of flexion. MPFL reconstruction decreased lateral patellar shift (bisect offset index) compared with preoperative tracking at all flexion angles from 0 to 50 degrees of flexion, except 45 degrees. At 0 degrees, the average bisect offset index decreased from 0.81 for the preoperative condition to 0.71. The results indicate that tension within an MPFL graft increases with the lateral position of the tibial tuberosity. The graft tension peaks at low flexion angles and decreases lateral patellar maltracking. The factors that influence graft function following MPFL reconstruction need to be understood to limit patellar maltracking without overloading the graft or over constraining the patella. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32143217      PMCID: PMC7483749          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.501


  49 in total

1.  Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Philip B Schöttle; Arno Schmeling; Nikolaus Rosenstiel; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Strain within the native and reconstructed MPFL during knee flexion.

Authors:  Patrick C McCulloch; Aaron Bott; Prem N Ramkumar; Alexander Suarez; Sabir K Isamaily; Daniel Daylamani; Philip C Noble
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sports.

Authors:  Sabine Lippacher; Jens Dreyhaupt; Sean R M Williams; Heiko Reichel; Manfred Nelitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The ability of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to correct patellar kinematics and contact mechanics in the presence of a lateralized tibial tubercle.

Authors:  Joanna M Stephen; Alexander L Dodds; Punyawan Lumpaopong; Deiary Kader; Andy Williams; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Characterization of patellar maltracking using dynamic kinematic CT imaging in patients with patellar instability.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; John J Elias; Ariel A Williams; Shadpour Demehri; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Biomechanical tensile strength analysis for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick W Joyner; Jeremy Bruce; Travis S Roth; Frederic Baker Mills; Scott Winnier; Ryan Hess; Luke Wilcox; Aaron Mates; Tim Frerichs; James R Andrews; Charles A Roth
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in paediatric patients with recurrent patella instability.

Authors:  Martin Lind; Ditte Enderlein; Torsten Nielsen; Svend Erik Christiansen; Peter Faunø
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability patients.

Authors:  Michael D Charles; Sean Haloman; Lina Chen; Samuel R Ward; Donald Fithian; Robert Afra
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Effect of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Method on Patellofemoral Contact Pressures and Kinematics.

Authors:  Joanna M Stephen; Christoph Kittl; Andy Williams; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Christian Fink; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Effect of Trochlear Dysplasia on Outcomes After Isolated Soft Tissue Stabilization for Patellar Instability.

Authors:  Laurie A Hiemstra; Sarah Kerslake; Michael Loewen; Mark Lafave
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.