| Literature DB >> 26943777 |
Bae Kwon Jeong1,2, Jin Ho Song1,2, Hojin Jeong1,2, Hoon Sik Choi1, Jung Hwa Jung3,2, Jong Ryeal Hahm3,2, Seung Hoon Woo4,2, Myeong Hee Jung5, Bong-Hoi Choi6, Jin Hyun Kim2,5, Ki Mun Kang1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiation therapy is a highly effective treatment for patients with solid tumors. However, it can cause damage and inflammation in normal tissues. Here, we investigated the effects of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) as radioprotection agent for the small intestine in a mouse model.Entities:
Keywords: alpha-lipoic acid; inflammation; oxidative stress; radiation therapy; small intestine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26943777 PMCID: PMC4924773 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Changes in body weight and food intake in mice with radiation-induced small intestinal injury
Body weight and food intake were monitored daily in all mice. All experiments were repeated three times. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE; n = 10 mice/group).
Figure 2Histopathological changes of the small intestine at 3, 7, and 14 days after irradiation
Height measurements from 10 villi were obtained in small intestine sections from each group at 200× magnification. Each bar shows the mean ± SE; *p < 0.05 indicates differences between groups. Con: control group; RT: radiation group; ALA + RT: received alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) before irradiation. Scale bar; 100 μm. Con and ALA (n = 4/each day), RT and ALA + RT (n = 10/each day).
Figure 3Apoptotic death in the small intestine with radiation-induced small intestinal injury
Apoptotic death was defined as the average number and density of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells in 10 random fields from each section at 400× magnification (A). Signals density for TUNEL-positive cells was measured in the marked areas (arrow, edge of the villi. arrowhead, the muscularis mucosa). Each bar represents the mean ± standard error (SE); *p < 0.05 indicates differences between the radiation (RT) and alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) + RT groups (B). Con: control group; RT: radiation group; ALA + RT: received ALA before irradiation. Scale bar; 100 μm. Con and ALA (n = 4/each day), RT and ALA + RT (n = 10/each day).
Figure 4Oxidative stress induced by radiation
Small intestinal tissue glutathione (GSH) levels were measured. Data are the mean ± standard error (SE); *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.05 indicate differences between groups (A). Malondialdehyde (MDA) was predominantly expressed at the edges of villi and in the muscularis externa and serosa (B). 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)-positive cells were localized at the small intestinal mucosa and submucosa and the muscularis externa and serosa (D). Signals density for MDA and 8-OHdG-positive cells were measured in the marked areas (arrow, edge of the villi. arrowhead, the muscularis mucosa). Data are the mean ± standard error (SE); *p < 0.05 indicate differences between groups (C and E). Scale bar; 100 μm. Con: control group; RT: radiation group; ALA + RT: received alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) before irradiation. Con and ALA (n = 4/each day), RT and ALA + RT (n = 10/each day).
Figure 5Western blotting was performed using anti-MMP-9 and anti-phosphorylated NF-κB antibodies
β-actin was evaluated as the loading control (A). Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) inhibited radiation-induced expression of MMP-9 and phosphorylated of NF-κB in the RT-induced small intestine. Con (n = 3/each day), RT and ALA + RT (n = 9/each day, n = 3/each lane) (B). ELISA analysis of serum IL-1β and IL-6 levels from each group on each day. Con (n = 5/each day), RT and ALA + RT (n = 10/each day and group) (C). Data are the mean ± standard error (SE); *p < 0.05 indicate differences between groups. Con: control group; RT: radiation group; ALA + RT: received ALA before irradiation.
Figure 6Western blotting was performed using anti-MMP-9 and anti-phosphorylated NF-κB antibodies
β-actin was evaluated as the loading control. Con: control group, ALA: alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) alone group. Con and ALA (n = 3/each day).
Experimental design and time table for treatment
| Days | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
| ALA | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| Radiation | √ | ||||||||||||||||
| Sampling | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
Thirty-nine BALB/c mice were randomized to four groups: i) control group (9 mice), ii) ALA group (9 mice), iii) RT group (11 mice), and RT + ALA group (10 mice). Small intestine damage was induced by irradiation (15 Gy, 1 fraction) on the abdomen. In the ALA group, mice received 100 mg/kg/day ALA by intraperitoneal injection on days −2 to 0. The control group received vehicle in the same way. The small intestine was collected 3rd, 7th, and 14th days after irradiation.