Literature DB >> 26941452

Accuracy of Colposcopically Guided Diagnostic Methods for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

K Müller1, P Soergel1, P Hillemanns1, M Jentschke1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Many factors can affect the accuracy of colposcopically guided biopsy, endocervical curettage (ECC) and differential cytology, all of which are standard, minimally invasive procedures used to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Method: All conizations carried out between 2007 and 2013 in the gynecological department of Hannover Medical School were retrospectively reviewed. The agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and histology was evaluated retrospectively. The analysis included 593 complete datasets out of a total of 717 cases treated.
Results: The overall agreement was 85.5 %; the accuracy was significantly higher (p = 0.029) when three biopsy specimens were taken rather than just one. The agreement between diagnosis and histological findings from conization was highest for women < 30 years (90.7 %) and lowest for women > 50 years (72.1 %; p = 0.008). The agreement between preoperative differential cytology and histology results after conization was 86.7 % and improved as patient age increased (p = 0.035). The agreement between ECC findings and the results of conization was only 49.1 % irrespective of patient age, transformation zone or the patient's menopausal status.
Conclusion: The accuracy of colposcopically guided biopsy appears to increase when three biopsy specimens are taken and is particularly high for younger patients. Differential cytology was also found to be highly accurate and is particularly useful for patients aged more than 50 years. The accuracy of ECC was significantly lower; however ECC can provide important additional information in selected cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); cervix; virus infection

Year:  2016        PMID: 26941452      PMCID: PMC4771495          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  24 in total

1.  The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement.

Authors:  B Barker; F Garcia; J Lozevski; J Warner; K Hatch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  [Colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical cancer].

Authors:  W Kühn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen.

Authors:  Christian Zuchna; Martina Hager; Barbara Tringler; Alexander Georgoulopoulos; Alexandra Ciresa-Koenig; Birgit Volgger; Andreas Widschwendter; Alfons Staudach
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents.

Authors:  Margaret E Baum; Janet S Rader; Randall K Gibb; Rebecca P McAlister; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Feng Gao; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

Authors:  Nina Duesing; Joerg Schwarz; Matthias Choschzick; Fritz Jaenicke; Friederike Gieseking; Rana Issa; Sven Mahner; Linn Woelber
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R M Richart
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1973

7.  The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.

Authors:  W Kirkup; A S Hill
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-01

8.  The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?

Authors:  Joseph D Rose; Sharon Y Byun; Shireen Madani Sims; John D Davis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Using history and colposcopy to select women for endocervical curettage. Results from 2,287 cases.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Yvonne C Collins
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  J L Benedet; G H Anderson; D A Boyes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Value of Partial HPV Genotyping After Conization of Cervical Dysplasias.

Authors:  Kristin Friebe; Rüdiger Klapdor; Peter Hillemanns; Matthias Jentschke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Certification as dysplasia unit and its impact on large loop electrosurgical excision (LEEP).

Authors:  Tatjana Hanczuk; Martin Weiss; Leon Henes; Tobias Engler; Felix Neis; Melanie Henes
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Can biopsies be omitted after normal colposcopy in women referred with low-grade cervical cytology? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Mindedahl Jespersen; Berit Bargum Booth; Lone Kjeld Petersen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Performance of three colposcopic images for the identification of squamous and glandular cervical precursor neoplasias.

Authors:  Giselle Fachetti-Machado; Rosane Ribeiro Figueiredo-Alves; Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in Detection of Squamous Cell Abnormalities in Iranian Women with Abnormal Pap's Smear Test and Associated Demographic and Issues.

Authors:  Fatemeh Samiee Rad; Mahdi Ghaebi; Simin Zarabadipour; Arezoo Bajelan; Fatemeh Pashazade; Mehri Kalhor; Amane Barikani
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2020-02-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.