Literature DB >> 36209297

Certification as dysplasia unit and its impact on large loop electrosurgical excision (LEEP).

Tatjana Hanczuk1, Martin Weiss2, Leon Henes2, Tobias Engler2, Felix Neis2, Melanie Henes3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the overall treatment indicators and outcomes of patients who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) at the Department of Women's Health Tübingen and the impact of certification as a dysplasia unit on treatment quality.
METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 1596 patients from 2013 to 2018 who underwent LEEP excision at the Department of Women's Health Tübingen. Data of cytology, colposcopy, biopsy, LEEP histology, repeat LEEP histology and general characteristics were collected and analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS: 85.4% (1364) of patients had CIN 2 + and 14.6% (232) had CIN 1 or normal findings on LEEP histology. The proportion of CIN 2 + excisions increased significantly from 82.4% in 2013 to 89% in 2018. The concordance of HSIL biopsy and LEEP histology was 89.1% in 2013 and 92.6% in 2018. In 2018, more biopsies and colposcopies were performed before excision. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 88.3% of all excisions. R0 rates in patients with CIN 3 increased in 2014-2017 compared to 2013, resulting in fewer Re-LEEP excisions and hysterectomies.
CONCLUSION: Certification as a dysplasia unit and the associated requirements have improved the diagnostic quality for patients with cervical dysplasia undergoing LEEP. This was demonstrated by several treatment indicators such as the number of colposcopies and biopsies and treatment outcomes such as an increased proportion of CIN 2 + excisions and R0 resections.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Colposcopy; Dysplasia; Quality assessment

Year:  2022        PMID: 36209297     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06807-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.493


  20 in total

Review 1.  Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer S Smith; Jane Green; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Paul Appleby; Julian Peto; Martyn Plummer; Silvia Franceschi; Valerie Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Joan L Walker; Michael A Gold; Katie M Smith; Rosemary E Zuna; Cara Mathews; S Terence Dunn; Roy Zhang; Katherine Moxley; Erin Bishop; Meaghan Tenney; Elizabeth Nugent; Barry I Graubard; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Smoking habit, immune suppression, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use and cervical carcinogenesis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Cecilia Barsotti; Stefania Cosio; Lavinia Domenici; Andrea Riccardo Genazzani
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy.

Authors:  Aiping Fan; Liqin Zhang; Chen Wang; Yingmei Wang; Cha Han; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Frederik A Stuebs; Carla E Schulmeyer; Grit Mehlhorn; Paul Gass; Sven Kehl; Simone K Renner; Stefan P Renner; Carol Geppert; Werner Adler; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W Beckmann; Martin C Koch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Prevalence of cervical disease at age 20 after immunisation with bivalent HPV vaccine at age 12-13 in Scotland: retrospective population study.

Authors:  Tim Palmer; Lynn Wallace; Kevin G Pollock; Kate Cuschieri; Chris Robertson; Kim Kavanagh; Margaret Cruickshank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-04-03

7.  Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Se Jeong Kim; Dong Hoon Suh; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong Beom Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Underwood; M Arbyn; W Parry-Smith; S De Bellis-Ayres; R Todd; C W E Redman; E L Moss
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Emma J Crosbie; Mark H Einstein; Silvia Franceschi; Henry C Kitchener
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Yuyeon Jung; Ah Ra Lee; Sung-Jong Lee; Yong Seok Lee; Dong Choon Park; Eun Kyung Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.