Literature DB >> 24563147

Benefits and unexpected artifacts of biplanar digital slot-scanning imaging in children.

Steven L Blumer1, David Dinan, Leslie E Grissom.   

Abstract

Biplanar digital slot-scanning allows for relatively low-dose orthopedic imaging, an advantage in imaging children given the growing concerns regarding radiosensitivity. We have used this system for approximately 1 year for orthopedic imaging of the spine and lower extremities. We have noted advantages of using the digital slot-scanning system when compared with computed radiographic and standard digital radiographic imaging systems, but we also found unexpected but common imaging artifacts that are the direct result of the imaging method and that have not been reported. This pictorial essay serves to familiarize radiologists with the advantages of the digital slot-scanning system as well as imaging artifacts common with this new technology.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24563147     DOI： 10.1007/s00247-014-2908-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN： 0301-0449


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tradeoffs between image quality and dose.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance.

Authors:  Gérard Morvan; Philippe Mathieu; Valérie Vuillemin; Henri Guerini; Philippe Bossard; Frédéric Zeitoun; Marc Wybier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  C McKenna; R Wade; R Faria; H Yang; L Stirk; N Gummerson; M Sculpher; N Woolacott
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal imaging in progress: the EOS imaging system.

Authors:  Marc Wybier; Philippe Bossard
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 6.  The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice.

Authors:  Tamás Illés; Szabolcs Somoskeöy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Visual illusions in computed tomography: phenomena related to Mach effect.

Authors:  R H Daffner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager.

Authors:  Sylvain Deschênes; Guy Charron; Gilles Beaudoin; Hubert Labelle; Josée Dubois; Marie-Claude Miron; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system.

Authors:  Ros Wade; Huiqin Yang; Claire McKenna; Rita Faria; Nigel Gummerson; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography.

Authors:  Tobias J Dietrich; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Alexander Schwab; Katja Pankalla; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.199
  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Stereoradiography imaging motion artifact: does it affect radiographic measures after spinal instrumentation?

Authors:  Anne-Laure Simon; Emmanuelle Ferrero; A N Larson; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliability of EOS compared to conventional radiographs for evaluation of lower extremity deformity in adult patients.

Authors:  Kelsey L Wise; Brandon J Kelly; Julie Agel; Shelly Marette; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A radiolucent chair for sitting-posture radiographs in non-ambulatory children: use in biplanar digital slot-scanning.

Authors:  Houssam Bouloussa; Arnaud Dubory; Catherine Seiler; Baptiste Morel; Manon Bachy; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-26

4.  Dose, image quality and spine modeling assessment of biplanar EOS micro-dose radiographs for the follow-up of in-brace adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Baptiste Morel; Sonia Moueddeb; Eleonore Blondiaux; Stephen Richard; Manon Bachy; Raphael Vialle; Hubert Ducou Le Pointe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spinal phantom comparability study of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using digital radiographic imaging.

Authors:  Ni Chung; Yi-Hong Cheng; Hiu-Lam Po; Wai-Kit Ng; Kam-Ching Cheung; Ho-Yin Yung; Yau-Ming Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Reliability of automated topographic measurements for spine deformity.

Authors:  Benjamin N Groisser; Howard J Hillstrom; Ankush Thakur; Kyle W Morse; Matthew Cunningham; M Timothy Hresko; Ron Kimmel; Alon Wolf; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.