Literature DB >> 26936722

Phase aberration simulation study of MRgFUS breast treatments.

Alexis I Farrer1, Scott Almquist1, Christopher R Dillon1, Leigh A Neumayer1, Dennis L Parker1, Douglas A Christensen1, Allison Payne1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This simulation study evaluates the effects of phase aberration in breast MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation treatments performed with a phased-array transducer positioned laterally to the breast. A quantification of these effects in terms of thermal dose delivery and the potential benefits of phase correction is demonstrated in four heterogeneous breast numerical models.
METHODS: To evaluate the effects of varying breast tissue properties on the quality of the focus, four female volunteers with confirmed benign fibroadenomas were imaged using 3T MRI. These images were segmented into numerical models with six tissue types, with each tissue type assigned standard acoustic properties from the literature. Simulations for a single-plane 16-point raster-scan treatment trajectory centered in a fibroadenoma in each modeled breast were performed for a breast-specific MRgFUS system. At each of the 16 points, pressure patterns both with and without applying a phase correction technique were determined with the hybrid-angular spectrum method. Corrected phase patterns were obtained using a simulation-based phase aberration correction technique to adjust each element's transmit phase to obtain maximized constructive interference at the desired focus. Thermal simulations were performed for both the corrected and uncorrected pressure patterns using a finite-difference implementation of the Pennes bioheat equation. The effect of phase correction was evaluated through comparison of thermal dose accumulation both within and outside a defined treatment volume. Treatment results using corrected and uncorrected phase aberration simulations were compared by evaluating the power required to achieve a 20 °C temperature rise at the first treatment location. The extent of the volumes that received a minimum thermal dose of 240 CEM at 43 °C inside the intended treatment volume as well as the volume in the remaining breast tissues was also evaluated in the form of a dose volume ratio (DVR), a DVR percent change between corrected and uncorrected phases, and an additional metric that measured phase spread.
RESULTS: With phase aberration correction applied, there was an improvement in the focus for all breast anatomies as quantified by a reduction in power required (13%-102%) to reach 20 °C when compared to uncorrected simulations. Also, the DVR percent change increased by 5%-77% in seven out of eight cases, indicating an improvement to the treatment as measured by a reduction in thermal dose deposited to the nontreatment tissues. Breast compositions with a higher degree of heterogeneity along the ultrasound beam path showed greater reductions in thermal dose delivered outside of the treatment volume with correction applied than beam trajectories that propagated through more homogeneous breast compositions. An increasing linear trend was observed between the DVR percent change and the phase-spread metric (R(2) = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that performing phase aberration correction for breast MRgFUS treatments is beneficial for the small-aperture transducer (14.4 × 9.8 cm) evaluated in this work. While all breast anatomies could benefit from phase aberration correction, greater benefits are observed in more heterogeneous anatomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936722      PMCID: PMC4769272          DOI: 10.1118/1.4941013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

1.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study.

Authors:  K Hynynen; O Pomeroy; D N Smith; P E Huber; N J McDannold; J Kettenbach; J Baum; S Singer; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation.

Authors:  Elissa R Price; Jonathan Hargreaves; Jafi A Lipson; Edward A Sickles; R James Brenner; Karen K Lindfors; Bonnie N Joe; Jessica W T Leung; Stephen A Feig; Lawrence W Bassett; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Bruce L Daniel; Allison W Kurian; Elyse Love; Lauren Ryan; Donna D Walgenbach; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A full-wave phase aberration correction method for transcranial high-intensity focused ultrasound brain therapies.

Authors:  Scott Almquist; Joshua de Bever; Robb Merrill; Dennis Parker; Douglas Christensen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

4.  A new noninvasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  P E Huber; J W Jenne; R Rastert; I Simiantonakis; H P Sinn; H J Strittmatter; D von Fournier; M F Wannenmacher; J Debus
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Performance analysis of a dedicated breast MR-HIFU system for tumor ablation in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R Deckers; L G Merckel; B Denis de Senneville; G Schubert; M Köhler; F M Knuttel; W P Th M Mali; C T W Moonen; M A A J van den Bosch; L W Bartels
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  In vivo evaluation of a breast-specific magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound system in a goat udder model.

Authors:  A Payne; N Todd; E Minalga; Y Wang; M Diakite; R Hadley; R Merrill; R Factor; L Neumayer; D L Parker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  MR imaging-guided focused US ablation of breast cancer: histopathologic assessment of effectiveness-- initial experience.

Authors:  David Gianfelice; Abdesslem Khiat; Mourad Amara; Assia Belblidia; Yvan Boulanger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Changes in biologic characteristics of breast cancer treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Feng Wu; Zhi-Biao Wang; You-De Cao; Wen-Zhi Chen; Jian-Zhong Zou; Jin Bai; Hui Zhu; Ke-Quan Li; Cheng-Bing Jin; Fang-Lin Xie; Hai-Bing Su; Gen-Wu Gao
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery as an adjunct to tamoxifen therapy in high-risk surgical patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  David Gianfelice; Abdesslem Khiat; Yvan Boulanger; Mourad Amara; Assia Belblidia
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Simulation study for thermal dose optimization in ultrasound surgery of the breast.

Authors:  Matti Malinen; Tomi Huttunen; Kullervo Hynynen; Jari P Kaipio
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  A modified mixed domain method for modeling acoustic wave propagation in strongly heterogeneous media.

Authors:  Juanjuan Gu; Yun Jing
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of k-space-weighted image contrast and ultrasound focus size on the accuracy of proton resonance frequency thermometry.

Authors:  Bryant T Svedin; Christopher R Dillon; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Effects of phase aberration on transabdominal focusing for a large aperture, lowf-number histotripsy transducer.

Authors:  Ellen Yeats; Dinank Gupta; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  A Breast-Specific MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Platform and Treatment Protocol: First-in-Human Technical Evaluation.

Authors:  Allison Payne; Robb Merrill; Emilee Minalga; J Rock Hadley; Henrik Odeen; Lorne W Hofstetter; Sara Johnson; Christine Tunon de Lara; Sophie Auriol; Stephanie Recco; Erik Dumont; Dennis L Parker; Jean Palussiere
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Effect of applied energy in renal sympathetic denervation with magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound in a porcine model.

Authors:  Jill Shea; Joshua de Bever; Eugene Kholmovski; Hannah Beal; J Rock Hadley; Emilee Minalga; Mohamed E Salama; Nassir F Marrouche; Allison Payne
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  Effects of breast structure on high-intensity focused ultrasound focal error.

Authors:  Kohei Okita; Ryuta Narumi; Takashi Azuma; Hidemi Furusawa; Junichi Shidooka; Shu Takagi; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2018-06-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.