Literature DB >> 2693662

Vascular (humoral) rejection in heart transplantation: pathologic observations and clinical implications.

E H Hammond1, R L Yowell, S Nunoda, R L Menlove, D G Renlund, M R Bristow, W A Gay, K W Jones, J B O'Connell.   

Abstract

We prospectively studied 551 sequential endomyocardial biopsies from 36 consecutive cardiac allografts. With the use of a combination of light microscopy (including careful evaluation of vascular changes) and immunofluorescence to detect the deposition of immunoglobulin and complement, we identified three patterns of allograft rejection, designated as cellular rejection, vascular (humoral) rejection, and mixed rejection. Cellular rejection was diagnosed with modified Billingham criteria. Vascular rejection was diagnosed by finding the combination of prominent endothelial cell swelling and/or vasculitis on light microscopy and the vascular deposition of immunoglobulin and complement by immunofluorescence. In such patients, cellular lymphoid infiltrates were uniformly absent at the time the vascular changes were detected. Mixed rejection consisted of findings of both cellular and vascular rejection occurring simultaneously. Twenty of 36 allografts exhibited cellular rejection; seven allografts showed vascular rejection, and nine allografts developed mixed rejection. The vascular (humoral) pattern of rejection was important to identify because the patients with this type of rejection had a significantly decreased survival compared with that of patients with cellular rejection (p less than 0.05). Survival in the mixed rejection category was intermediate. Positive donor-specific cross-match and/or panel-reactive antibody greater than or equal to 5% and systolic dysfunction were seen in three of the seven allografts with vascular (humoral) rejection but not in the other types. In the early period after transplant (up to 3 weeks after transplant), the only reliable identifying characteristics of patients with vascular (humoral) rejection were the presence of vascular immunoglobulin and complement assessed by immunofluorescence and endothelial cell swelling and interstitial edema as confirmed by histologic examination. We conclude that immunofluorescence should be routinely done on all heart biopsies for the first month after transplantation. Patients with vascular (humoral) rejection cannot be reliably identified by any other means.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2693662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Transplant        ISSN: 0887-2570


  31 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in patients after cardiac transplantation and in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Bhanu Gupta; Dany Jacob; Randall Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  [Heart transplantation. Pathology, clinical work-up and therapy].

Authors:  H A Baba; J Wohlschläger; J Stypmann; N E Hiemann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring.

Authors:  Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Andrew J Lesniak; Anthony J Demetris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Reliability of intramyocardial electrogram for the noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection after heart transplantation in rats.

Authors:  Jiahai Shi; Shiguo Qian; Xu Meng; Jie Han; Yangtian Chen; Jiangang Wang; Haibo Zhang; Yixin Jia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Right Ventricular Dysfunction as an Echocardiographic Measure of Acute Rejection Following Heart Transplantation in Children.

Authors:  Sanjeev Aggarwal; Jennifer Blake; Swati Sehgal
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Antibody-mediated rejection in human cardiac allografts: evaluation of immunoglobulins and complement activation products C4d and C3d as markers.

Authors:  E R Rodriguez; Diane V Skojec; Carmela D Tan; Andrea A Zachary; Edward K Kasper; John V Conte; William M Baldwin
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  VLA-4 and lymphocyte trafficking in immune-inflammatory states: novel therapeutic approaches in allograft arteriopathy.

Authors:  S Molossi; M Rabinovitch
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1995

8.  Unexplained Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation-Role of Novel Molecular Expression Test Score and QTc-Interval: A Case Report.

Authors:  Khurram Shahzad; Martin Cadeiras; Kotaro Arai; Dmitry Abramov; Elizabeth Burke; Mario C Deng
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Coronary occlusive disease and late graft failure after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  P A Mullins; N R Cary; L Sharples; J Scott; D Aravot; S R Large; J Wallwork; P M Schofield
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-09

10.  Impairment of coronary flow reserve in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients with minor coronary occlusive disease.

Authors:  P A Mullins; A Chauhan; L Sharples; N R Cary; S R Large; J Wallwork; P M Schofield
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.