Literature DB >> 24605226

Reliability of intramyocardial electrogram for the noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection after heart transplantation in rats.

Jiahai Shi1, Shiguo Qian1, Xu Meng1, Jie Han1, Yangtian Chen1, Jiangang Wang1, Haibo Zhang1, Yixin Jia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability of the QRS amplitude of the autonomous intramyocardial electrogram (IMEG) and the maximum slope of the descending T wave (Tslew) of the ventricular evoked response (VER) for surveillance of acute allograft rejection (AR) after heart transplantation in rats.
METHODS: Forty rats underwent heterotopic heart transplantation, including ten isograft (isograft group) and 30 allograft (allograft group) recipients. Autonomous IMEG and VER were recorded with epicardiac pacing leads. Isograft recipients were sacrificed on postoperative day 7 and allograft recipients on postoperative days 3, 5 and 7. Graft heart histopathological examinations were performed at the corresponding time points.
RESULTS: Postoperative QRS amplitude and Tslew gradually decreased in the allograft group, but were unaltered in the isograft group. Decreases in the allograft group QRS amplitudes and Tslew values correlated with the histopathological results. At the optimal cutoff point of 90%, Tslew had 94.74% sensitivity, 81.82% specificity, 82.61% positive and 90% negative predictive values. QRS had 68.42% sensitivity, 90.91% specificity, 92.86% positive and 62.50% negative predictive values at its optimal cutoff point of 72.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: The QRS amplitude of the autonomous IMEG and Tslew of VER are reliable markers for monitoring AR after heart transplantation in rats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart transplantation; acute allograft rejection; intramyocardial electrogram (IMEG)

Year:  2014        PMID: 24605226      PMCID: PMC3944186          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.02.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  11 in total

1.  Intramyocardial electrogram recordings (IMEG) for diagnosis of cellular and humoral mediated cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  C Knosalla; O Grauhan; J Muller; R Pfitzmann; E Fietze; T Cohnert; H D Volk; R Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  M E Billingham; N R Cary; M E Hammond; J Kemnitz; C Marboe; H A McCallister; D C Snovar; G L Winters; A Zerbe
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

3.  Diagnostic reliability of endomyocardial biopsy for assessment of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  T R Zerbe; V Arena
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  The utility of pacemaker evoked T wave amplitude for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  A D Bainbridge; M Cave; S Newell; M Delaney; J Parameshwar; S R Large; J Wallwork; A A Grace; N R Carey; P M Schofield
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  [Non-invasive monitoring of rejection after cardiac transplantation. The method and retrospective analysis of data on 734 patients].

Authors:  J Müller; A Eubel; M Dandel; M Hummel; R Hetzer
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 0.628

6.  Heart transplant rejection monitored by signal-averaged electrocardiography in patients receiving cyclosporine.

Authors:  A Keren; A M Gillis; R A Freedman; J C Baldwin; M E Billingham; E B Stinson; M B Simson; J W Mason
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Using intramyocardial electrograms combined with other noninvasive methods for monitoring acute rejection following human heart transplantation.

Authors:  Yi-xin Jia; Xu Meng; Ling-bo Sun; Jie Han; Yang-tian Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Clinical heart transplantation without routine endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  H Warnecke; J Müller; T Cohnert; M Hummel; S Spiegelsberger; H K Siniawski; E Lieback; R Hetzer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Vascular (humoral) rejection in heart transplantation: pathologic observations and clinical implications.

Authors:  E H Hammond; R L Yowell; S Nunoda; R L Menlove; D G Renlund; M R Bristow; W A Gay; K W Jones; J B O'Connell
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

10.  Risk factors for late recurrent rejection after heart transplantation: a multiinstitutional, multivariable analysis. Cardiac Transplant Research Database Group.

Authors:  S H Kubo; D C Naftel; R M Mills; J O'Donnell; R J Rodeheffer; G B Cintron; J L Kenzora; R C Bourge; J K Kirklin
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changes in the action potential and transient outward potassium current in cardiomyocytes during acute cardiac rejection in rats.

Authors:  Wenqi Luo; Yixin Jia; Shuai Zheng; Yan Li; Jie Han; Xu Meng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The changes of vaccinia related kinase 1 in grafted heart after rat heart transplantation.

Authors:  Shiguo Qian; Xuechao Yang; Kunpeng Wu; Qiangsheng Lv; Yuanyuan Zhang; Jiahong Dai; Cheng Chen; Jiahai Shi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.