Literature DB >> 1389756

Impairment of coronary flow reserve in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients with minor coronary occlusive disease.

P A Mullins1, A Chauhan, L Sharples, N R Cary, S R Large, J Wallwork, P M Schofield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Coronary occlusive disease is the major long-term complication after cardiac transplantation. The relation between minor angiographic abnormalities and myocardial perfusion has not been previously assessed in a large number of cardiac transplant patients.
DESIGN: Prospective study. Coronary flow reserve was measured with an intracoronary Doppler flow probe in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery in each patient. A dose of intracoronary papaverine producing maximal vasodilation was then administered.
SETTING: A regional cardiothoracic centre and a supraregional transplant unit. PATIENTS: Seven patients with chest pain but normal coronary anatomy (controls), and 61 cardiac transplant patients between three months and 10 years after operation (median 4.5 years). Twenty one cardiac transplant patients had angiographic evidence of minor coronary occlusive disease (mean (SD) percentage stenosis diameter 23% (6%)) in a primary or secondary coronary vessel (group 1), with 12 of these in the left anterior descending coronary artery (stenosis diameter (mean (SD) 24% (8%)). The remaining 40 transplant patients had normal coronary angiograms (group 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Coronary flow reserve was defined as the ratio of the peak flow velocity after papaverine to the resting flow velocity.
RESULTS: Group 1 patients had a noticeably impaired coronary flow reserve (2.6 (1.1)) compared with control patients (3.9 (0.4), p = 0.05) and, after adjusting for year after operation, compared with group 2 patients (3.8 (1.0), p < 0.001). No other variables were associated with a reduction in coronary flow reserve. Mean resting flow velocity was similar in all three groups (controls, 7.4 (4.6) cm/s; group 1, 7.5 (5.9) cm/s; and group 2, 7.3 (3.9) cm/s). Mean peak flow velocity response to papaverine was reduced in group 1 patients (18.1 (13.5) cm/s) relative to group 2 patients (27.5 (15.4) cm/s, p = 0.05) but not controls (28.4 (15.1) cm/s, p = 0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary flow reserve and the peak flow response to the coronary vascular smooth muscle relaxant papaverine are impaired in cardiac transplant patients with minor coronary occlusive disease. This disturbance of cardiac microvascular function may contribute to the late morbidity and mortality seen in cardiac transplant patients with coronary occlusive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1389756      PMCID: PMC1025068          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.68.9.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  28 in total

Review 1.  Cyclosporine.

Authors:  B D Kahan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Compensatory changes of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive coronary constriction.

Authors:  K L Gould; K Lipscomb; C Calvert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Cardiac transplant atherosclerosis.

Authors:  M E Billingham
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard".

Authors:  M L Marcus; D J Skorton; M R Johnson; S M Collins; D G Harrison; R E Kerber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart Transplantation: seventh official report--1990.

Authors:  J M Kriett; M P Kaye
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug

6.  Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care.

Authors:  F J Klocke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Frequency of hypercholesterolemia after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  J S Stamler; D E Vaughan; M A Rudd; G H Mudge; J Kirshenbaum; P Young; R W Alexander; J Loscalzo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Polymorphous ventricular tachycardia: a side effect of intracoronary papaverine.

Authors:  C L Talman; M D Winniford; J D Rossen; I Simonetti; M G Kienzle; M L Marcus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Intracoronary papaverine: an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the coronary circulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  R F Wilson; C W White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Frequency of angiographic detection and quantitative assessment of coronary arterial disease one and three years after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  B J O'Neill; P W Pflugfelder; N R Singh; A H Menkis; F N McKenzie; W J Kostuk
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Transplant allograft vasculopathy: Role of multimodality imaging in surveillance and diagnosis.

Authors:  Gregory A Payne; Fadi G Hage; Deepak Acharya
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Long-term complications of cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  J Parameshwar; P Schofield; S Large
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-10

3.  Effect of hyperventilation and mental stress on coronary blood flow in syndrome X.

Authors:  A Chauhan; P A Mullins; G Taylor; M C Petch; P M Schofield
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.