Andreana De Mauri1, Roberta Matheoud2, Alessandro Carriero3, Domenico Lizio2, Doriana Chiarinotti4, Marco Brambilla2. 1. Nephrology Department, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. andreanademauri@libero.it. 2. Medical Physics Department, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. 3. Radiology Department, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. 4. Nephrology Department, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ionizing radiation exposure from medical procedures is rising sharply-the per-capita annual effective dose in the US is 3.0 millisieverts (mSv). Hemodialyzed and kidney transplanted patients receive still higher doses of ionizing radiation due to the presence of multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) among dialyzed patients undergoing renal pre-transplant evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 70 hemodialysis patients between June 2009 and December 2014, aged 46.4 ± 12.0 years. The number and type of radiologic procedures were collected through the Radiology Information System. CED was expressed as total mSv/patient and annual CED (mSv/patient/year). RESULTS: A total of 744 radiologic procedures were performed, accounting for 3869 mSv of ionizing radiation: conventional radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine accounted for 78, 14 and 8 % of the procedures, but they represented, respectively, 8, 83 and 9 % of the total CED. The mean (median) annual CED was 35 (7) mSv/patient/year, while total CED was 72 (32) mSv/patient. Thirty-seven patients were active waitlisted and received 47 (10) mSv during the pre-transplant evaluation and 36 (5) mSv during the waiting phase to maintain active status. Concerning cancer risk, 4 (7 %) patients were classified at low risk (<3 mSv/year), 19 (35 %) at moderate risk (3 to <20 mSv/year), 8 (15 %) at high risk (20 to <50 mSv/year), and 23 (43 %) at very high risk (≥50 mSv/year). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that during renal pre-transplant evaluation, dialyzed patients receive a high dose of ionizing radiation. Considering that transplanted individuals have a high incidence of cancer due to multifactorial etiology, it is mandatory to reduce the ionizing radiation imaging.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ionizing radiation exposure from medical procedures is rising sharply-the per-capita annual effective dose in the US is 3.0 millisieverts (mSv). Hemodialyzed and kidney transplanted patients receive still higher doses of ionizing radiation due to the presence of multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) among dialyzed patients undergoing renal pre-transplant evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 70 hemodialysis patients between June 2009 and December 2014, aged 46.4 ± 12.0 years. The number and type of radiologic procedures were collected through the Radiology Information System. CED was expressed as total mSv/patient and annual CED (mSv/patient/year). RESULTS: A total of 744 radiologic procedures were performed, accounting for 3869 mSv of ionizing radiation: conventional radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine accounted for 78, 14 and 8 % of the procedures, but they represented, respectively, 8, 83 and 9 % of the total CED. The mean (median) annual CED was 35 (7) mSv/patient/year, while total CED was 72 (32) mSv/patient. Thirty-seven patients were active waitlisted and received 47 (10) mSv during the pre-transplant evaluation and 36 (5) mSv during the waiting phase to maintain active status. Concerning cancer risk, 4 (7 %) patients were classified at low risk (<3 mSv/year), 19 (35 %) at moderate risk (3 to <20 mSv/year), 8 (15 %) at high risk (20 to <50 mSv/year), and 23 (43 %) at very high risk (≥50 mSv/year). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that during renal pre-transplant evaluation, dialyzed patients receive a high dose of ionizing radiation. Considering that transplanted individuals have a high incidence of cancer due to multifactorial etiology, it is mandatory to reduce the ionizing radiation imaging.
Authors: Andreana De Mauri; Marco Brambilla; Doriana Chiarinotti; Roberta Matheoud; Alessandro Carriero; Martino De Leo Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Germaine Wong; Andrew Hayen; Jeremy R Chapman; Angela C Webster; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Jonathan C Craig Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: John H Stewart; Claire M Vajdic; Marina T van Leeuwen; Janaki Amin; Angela C Webster; Jeremy R Chapman; Stephen P McDonald; Andrew E Grulich; Margaret R E McCredie Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2009-07-08 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-21