Literature DB >> 26931816

Medial temporal lobe viscoelasticity and relational memory performance.

Hillary Schwarb1, Curtis L Johnson2, Matthew D J McGarry3, Neal J Cohen4.   

Abstract

Structural and functional imaging studies have been among converging lines of evidence demonstrating the importance of the hippocampus in successful memory performance. The advent of a novel neuroimaging technique - magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) - now makes it possible for us to investigate the relationship between the microstructural integrity of hippocampal tissue and successful memory processing. Mechanical properties of brain tissue estimated with MRE provide a measure of the integrity of the underlying tissue microstructure and have proven to be sensitive measures of tissue health in neurodegeneration. However, until recently, MRE methods lacked sufficient resolution necessary to accurately examine specific neuroanatomical structures in the brain, and thus could not contribute to examination of specific structure-function relationships. In this study, we took advantage of recent developments in MRE spatial resolution and mechanical inversion techniques to measure the viscoelastic properties of the human hippocampus in vivo, and investigated how these properties reflect hippocampal function. Our data reveal a strong relationship between relative elastic/viscous behavior of the hippocampus and relational memory performance (N=20). This is the first report linking the mechanical properties of brain tissue with functional performance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elastography; Hippocampus; Memory; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26931816      PMCID: PMC4970644          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  58 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the hippocampus and verbal memory performance: the RUN DMC study.

Authors:  Anouk G W van Norden; Karlijn F de Laat; Ilma Fick; Inge W M van Uden; Lucas J B van Oudheusden; Rob A R Gons; David G Norris; Marcel P Zwiers; Roy P C Kessels; Frank-Erik de Leeuw
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Spatial reconstruction by patients with hippocampal damage is dominated by relational memory errors.

Authors:  Patrick D Watson; Joel L Voss; David E Warren; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Arvin Arani; Matthew C Murphy; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; David S Lake; Scott A Kruse; Clifford R Jack; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  3D multislab, multishot acquisition for fast, whole-brain MR elastography with high signal-to-noise efficiency.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Joseph L Holtrop; Matthew D J McGarry; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen; John G Georgiadis; Bradley P Sutton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Volume of the hippocampal subfields in healthy adults: differential associations with age and a pro-inflammatory genetic variant.

Authors:  Naftali Raz; Ana M Daugherty; Andrew R Bender; Cheryl L Dahle; Susan Land
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 7.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Clifford R Jack; Kevin J Glaser; Matthew L Senjem; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Enhanced adult neurogenesis increases brain stiffness: in vivo magnetic resonance elastography in a mouse model of dopamine depletion.

Authors:  Charlotte Klein; Elisabeth G Hain; Juergen Braun; Kerstin Riek; Susanne Mueller; Barbara Steiner; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cerebral magnetic resonance elastography in supranuclear palsy and idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Axel Lipp; Radmila Trbojevic; Friedemann Paul; Andreas Fehlner; Sebastian Hirsch; Michael Scheel; Cornelia Noack; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  39 in total

1.  Hippocampus at 25.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum; David G Amaral; Elizabeth A Buffalo; György Buzsáki; Neal Cohen; Lila Davachi; Loren Frank; Stephan Heckers; Richard G M Morris; Edvard I Moser; Lynn Nadel; John O'Keefe; Alison Preston; Charan Ranganath; Alcino Silva; Menno Witter
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Double dissociation of structure-function relationships in memory and fluid intelligence observed with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Kevin M Horecka; Matthew D J McGarry; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Reliable preparation of agarose phantoms for use in quantitative magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Elahe Ganji; Catherine Cooper; Megan L Killian; Babatunde A Ogunnaike; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-05-03

4.  Viscoelasticity of subcortical gray matter structures.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Matthew D J McGarry; Aaron T Anderson; Graham R Huesmann; Bradley P Sutton; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Artificial neural networks for magnetic resonance elastography stiffness estimation in inhomogeneous materials.

Authors:  Jonathan M Scott; Arvin Arani; Armando Manduca; Kiaran P McGee; Joshua D Trzasko; John Huston; Richard L Ehman; Matthew C Murphy
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Exercise training effects on memory and hippocampal viscoelasticity in multiple sclerosis: a novel application of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Brian M Sandroff; Curtis L Johnson; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Reconstructing relational information.

Authors:  Kevin M Horecka; Michael R Dulas; Hillary Schwarb; Heather D Lucas; Melissa Duff; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Phantom evaluations of nonlinear inversion MR elastography.

Authors:  Ligin M Solamen; Matthew D McGarry; Likun Tan; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Viscoelasticity of reward and control systems in adolescent risk taking.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Rebecca G Clements; Emily M Magoon; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Eva H Telzer; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Stiffness and Beyond: What MR Elastography Can Tell Us About Brain Structure and Function Under Physiologic and Pathologic Conditions.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Anthony J Romano; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.