Literature DB >> 29232494

Reconstructing relational information.

Kevin M Horecka1, Michael R Dulas1, Hillary Schwarb1, Heather D Lucas2, Melissa Duff3, Neal J Cohen1.   

Abstract

Hippocampal involvement in learning and remembering relational information has an extensive history, often focusing specifically on spatial information. In humans, spatial reconstruction (SR) paradigms are a powerful tool for evaluating an individuals' spatial-relational memory. In SR tasks, participants study locations of items in space and subsequently reconstruct the studied display after a short delay. Previous work has revealed that patients with hippocampal damage are impaired both in overall placement accuracy as well as on a specific measure of relational memory efficacy, "swaps" (i.e., when the relative location of two items is reversed). However, the necessity of the hippocampus for other types of spatial-relational information involved in reconstruction behaviors (e.g., where in the environment and relative to which other items an item was located) have not yet been investigated systematically. In this work, three patients with hippocampal damage and nine healthy matched comparison participants performed an SR task. An analysis framework was developed to independently assess three first-order types of relations: (1) memory for the binding of specific item identities to locations, (2) memory for arrangement of items in relation to each other or the environment bounds, regardless of memory for the item identity, and (3) higher-order, compound relational errors (i.e., errors involving multiple pieces of relational information). Reconstruction errors were evaluated to determine the degree to which patients and comparisons differed (or not) on each type of spatial-relational information. Data revealed that the primary group difference in performance was for identity-location information. However, when the locations of items were evaluated without regarding the identities, no group difference was found in the number of item placements to studied locations. The present work provides a principled approach to analysis of SR data and clarifies our understanding of the types of spatial relations impaired in hippocampal damaged.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding; declarative memory; online processing; relational memory; spatial reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29232494      PMCID: PMC5877827          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  47 in total

1.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map … of Social Space.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; M W Brown
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  The role of the right hippocampus in the recall of spatial location.

Authors:  M L Smith; B Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Spatial reconstruction by patients with hippocampal damage is dominated by relational memory errors.

Authors:  Patrick D Watson; Joel L Voss; David E Warren; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Dynamics of mismatch correction in the hippocampal ensemble code for space: interaction between path integration and environmental cues.

Authors:  K M Gothard; W E Skaggs; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Intact working memory for relational information after medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Annette Jeneson; Kristin N Mauldin; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Aerobic fitness, hippocampal viscoelasticity, and relational memory performance.

Authors:  Hillary Schwarb; Curtis L Johnson; Ana M Daugherty; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Relational memory and the hippocampus: representations and methods.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans.

Authors:  Tom Hartley; Chris M Bird; Dennis Chan; Lisa Cipolotti; Masud Husain; Faraneh Vargha-Khadem; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  7 in total

1.  Temporal order memory impairments in individuals with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Michael R Dulas; Emily L Morrow; Hillary Schwarb; Neal J Cohen; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.283

2.  Searching for Semantic Knowledge: A Vector Space Semantic Analysis of the Feature Generation Task.

Authors:  Rebecca A Cutler; Melissa C Duff; Sean M Polyn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The influence of object-location binding mental load effects on the visual N1 and N2 Event-related Potentials.

Authors:  Solwoong Song; Jinsick Park; Young Min Park; In Young Kim; Dong Pyo Jang
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  Relational Memory at Short and Long Delays in Individuals With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Emily L Morrow; Michael R Dulas; Neal J Cohen; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Impact of 3-Day Combined Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation-Visuospatial Training on Object-Location Memory in Healthy Older Adults and Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Angelica Vieira Cavalcanti de Sousa; Ulrike Grittner; Dan Rujescu; Nadine Külzow; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  Memory Reinforcement and Attenuation by Activating the Human Locus Coeruleus via Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Niels Hansen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Hippocampal viscoelasticity and episodic memory performance in healthy older adults examined with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Lucy V Hiscox; Curtis L Johnson; Matthew D J McGarry; Hillary Schwarb; Edwin J R van Beek; Neil Roberts; John M Starr
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.978

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.