Literature DB >> 26930116

A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.

Gary E Marchant1, Yvonne A Stevens1.   

Abstract

The question of whether biotechnology regulation should be based on the process or the product has long been debated, with different jurisdictions adopting different approaches. The European Union has adopted a process-based approach, Canada has adopted a product-based approach, and the United States has implemented a hybrid system. With the recent proliferation of new methods of genetic modification, such as gene editing, process-based regulatory systems, which are premised on a binary system of transgenic and conventional approaches, will become increasingly obsolete and unsustainable. To avoid unreasonable, unfair and arbitrary results, nations that have adopted process-based approaches will need to migrate to a product-based approach that considers the novelty and risks of the individual trait, rather than the process by which that trait was produced. This commentary suggests some approaches for the design of such a product-based approach.

Keywords:  biotechnology, regulation, process-based, product-based, gene editing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26930116      PMCID: PMC5033199          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  16 in total

1.  Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1986-06-26

Review 2.  Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Stuart Smyth; Alan McHughen
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.803

3.  Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.

Authors:  Alan McHughen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Bertrand C Y Collard; David J Mackill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  GM directive deficiencies in the European Union. The current framework for regulating GM crops in the EU weakens the precautionary principle as a policy tool.

Authors:  Shane H Morris; Charles Spillane
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Genetic modification through oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis. A GMO regulatory challenge?

Authors:  Didier Breyer; Philippe Herman; Annick Brandenburger; Godelieve Gheysen; Erik Remaut; Patrice Soumillion; Jan Van Doorsselaere; René Custers; Katia Pauwels; Myriam Sneyers; Dirk Reheul
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2009-10-16

Review 7.  Getting the 'MOST' out of crop improvement.

Authors:  Songlin Hu; Thomas Lübberstedt
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 18.313

8.  Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape.

Authors:  Nancy Podevin; Yann Devos; Howard Vivian Davies; Kaare Magne Nielsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Horizontal genome transfer as an asexual path to the formation of new species.

Authors:  Ignacia Fuentes; Sandra Stegemann; Hieronim Golczyk; Daniel Karcher; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Kan Wang; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic modification in Malaysia and India: current regulatory framework and the special case of non-transformative RNAi in agriculture.

Authors:  Jasdeep Kaur Darsan Singh; Nurzatil Sharleeza Mat Jalaluddin; Neeti Sanan-Mishra; Jennifer Ann Harikrishna
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Regulatory Uncertainty Around New Breeding Techniques.

Authors:  Rim Lassoued; Stuart J Smyth; Peter W B Phillips; Hayley Hesseln
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding.

Authors:  Dennis Eriksson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing.

Authors:  Penny A C Hundleby; Wendy A Harwood
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.109

Review 5.  Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.

Authors:  Crystal Turnbull; Morten Lillemo; Trine A K Hvoslef-Eide
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.