Literature DB >> 18028290

Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.

Stuart Smyth1, Alan McHughen.   

Abstract

The advent of genetically modified crops in the late 1980s triggered a regulatory response to the relatively new field of plant genetic engineering. Over a 7-year period, a new regulatory framework was created, based on scientific principles that focused on risk mitigation. The process was transparent and deliberately sought the input of those involved in crop development from non-governmental organizations, industry, academia and federal research laboratories. The resulting regulations have now been in place for over a decade, and the resilience of the risk-mitigating regulations is evident as there has been no documented case of damage to either environment or human health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18028290     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00309.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  9 in total

1.  Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape.

Authors:  Nancy Podevin; Yann Devos; Howard Vivian Davies; Kaare Magne Nielsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.

Authors:  Gary E Marchant; Yvonne A Stevens
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Comparability of imazapyr-resistant Arabidopsis created by transgenesis and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jaimie Schnell; Hélène Labbé; Nik Kovinich; Yuzuki Manabe; Brian Miki
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Coloring genetically modified soybean grains with anthocyanins by suppression of the proanthocyanidin genes ANR1 and ANR2.

Authors:  Nik Kovinich; Ammar Saleem; Tara L Rintoul; Daniel C W Brown; John T Arnason; Brian Miki
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Pollen-mediated gene flow in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): can genetically engineered and organic flax coexist?

Authors:  A J Jhala; H Bhatt; K Topinka; L M Hall
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Domesticated, Genetically Engineered, and Wild Plant Relatives Exhibit Unintended Phenotypic Differences: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Profiling Rice, Canola, Maize, Sunflower, and Pumpkin.

Authors:  Alejandra Hernández-Terán; Ana Wegier; Mariana Benítez; Rafael Lira; Ana E Escalante
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Sequencing of two transgenic early-flowering poplar lines confirmed vector-free single-locus T-DNA integration.

Authors:  Birgit Kersten; Ana Paula Leite Montalvão; Hans Hoenicka; Cristina Vettori; Donatella Paffetti; Matthias Fladung
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 8.  The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Kan Wang; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.

Authors:  Jon Entine; Maria Sueli S Felipe; Jan-Hendrik Groenewald; Drew L Kershen; Martin Lema; Alan McHughen; Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno; Ryo Ohsawa; Reynante L Ordonio; Wayne A Parrott; Hector Quemada; Carl Ramage; Inez Slamet-Loedin; Stuart J Smyth; Diane Wray-Cahen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.788

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.