Literature DB >> 19833073

Genetic modification through oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis. A GMO regulatory challenge?

Didier Breyer1, Philippe Herman, Annick Brandenburger, Godelieve Gheysen, Erik Remaut, Patrice Soumillion, Jan Van Doorsselaere, René Custers, Katia Pauwels, Myriam Sneyers, Dirk Reheul.   

Abstract

In the European Union, the definition of a GMO is technology-based. This means that a novel organism will be regulated under the GMO regulatory framework only if it has been developed with the use of defined techniques. This approach is now challenged with the emergence of new techniques. In this paper, we describe regulatory and safety issues associated with the use of oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis to develop novel organisms. We present scientific arguments for not having organisms developed through this technique fall within the scope of the EU regulation on GMOs. We conclude that any political decision on this issue should be taken on the basis of a broad reflection at EU level, while avoiding discrepancies at international level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19833073     DOI: 10.1051/ebr/2009007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res        ISSN: 1635-7922


  10 in total

1.  Tiptoeing around transgenics.

Authors:  Emily Waltz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Renegotiating GM crop regulation. Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Adam Kokotovich
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.

Authors:  Gary E Marchant; Yvonne A Stevens
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Relaxed chromatin induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors improves the oligonucleotide-directed gene editing in plant cells.

Authors:  Hilda Tiricz; Bettina Nagy; Györgyi Ferenc; Katalin Török; István Nagy; Dénes Dudits; Ferhan Ayaydin
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Induced Genetic Variation in Crop Plants by Random or Targeted Mutagenesis: Convergence and Differences.

Authors:  Inger B Holme; Per L Gregersen; Henrik Brinch-Pedersen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Villalobos-López; Analilia Arroyo-Becerra; Anareli Quintero-Jiménez; Gabriel Iturriaga
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 7.  Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis for precision gene editing.

Authors:  Noel J Sauer; Jerry Mozoruk; Ryan B Miller; Zachary J Warburg; Keith A Walker; Peter R Beetham; Christian R Schöpke; Greg F W Gocal
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 8.  The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Kan Wang; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  New Biotechnological Tools for the Genetic Improvement of Major Woody Fruit Species.

Authors:  Cecilia Limera; Silvia Sabbadini; Jeremy B Sweet; Bruno Mezzetti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Exclusion or exemption from risk regulation?: A comparative analysis of proposals to amend the EU GMO legislation.

Authors:  Tomasz Zimny; Dennis Eriksson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 9.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.