Literature DB >> 26926834

Disappearance of the inversion effect during memory-guided tracking of scrambled biological motion.

Changhao Jiang1, Guang H Yue2, Tingting Chen3, Jinhong Ding4.   

Abstract

The human visual system is highly sensitive to biological motion. Even when a point-light walker is temporarily occluded from view by other objects, our eyes are still able to maintain tracking continuity. To investigate how the visual system establishes a correspondence between the biological-motion stimuli visible before and after the disruption, we used the occlusion paradigm with biological-motion stimuli that were intact or scrambled. The results showed that during visually guided tracking, both the observers' predicted times and predictive smooth pursuit were more accurate for upright biological motion (intact and scrambled) than for inverted biological motion. During memory-guided tracking, however, the processing advantage for upright as compared with inverted biological motion was not found in the scrambled condition, but in the intact condition only. This suggests that spatial location information alone is not sufficient to build and maintain the representational continuity of the biological motion across the occlusion, and that the object identity may act as an important information source in visual tracking. The inversion effect disappeared when the scrambled biological motion was occluded, which indicates that when biological motion is temporarily occluded and there is a complete absence of visual feedback signals, an oculomotor prediction is executed to maintain the tracking continuity, which is established not only by updating the target's spatial location, but also by the retrieval of identity information stored in long-term memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological motion; Identity–location bindings; Inversion effect; Occlusion paradigm; Predictive smooth pursuit

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26926834     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0994-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  54 in total

1.  Regulation of the gain of visually guided smooth-pursuit eye movements by frontal cortex.

Authors:  M Tanaka; S G Lisberger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Can semantic knowledge influence motion correspondence?

Authors:  K Yu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays.

Authors:  H Hill; F E Pollick
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

4.  Effects of learning on smooth pursuit during transient disappearance of a visual target.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Human ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual target.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The influence of briefly presented randomized target motion on the extraretinal component of ocular pursuit.

Authors:  G R Barnes; C J S Collins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tracking unique objects.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Sarah B Klieger; David E Fencsik; Kevin K Yang; George A Alvarez; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

8.  Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: effects of target presence and subject attention.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

1.  Global-local consistency benefits memory-guided tracking of a moving target.

Authors:  Tingting Chen; Jinhong Ding; Guang H Yue; Haoqiang Liu; Jie Li; Changhao Jiang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.708

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.